A Toolbox for Understanding and Implementing a Citizens’ Observatory on Air Monitoring

Part of the Multimedia Systems and Applications book series (MMSA)


This chapter explores the growing trend of using innovative tools, particularly low cost micro-sensors and mobile apps, to facilitate the citizen participation process within an environmental monitoring programme. Special focus will be put on tools that are linked to major initiatives that form citizens’ observatories (CitObs) on air quality and that address novel ways to involve citizens. On the basis of providing an overview of a Citizens’ Observatory’ Toolbox (COT) developed in the EU FP7 CITI-SENSE project, this chapter introduces a number of tools that together provide the foundation of a complete citizens’ observatory. We present these tools from two perspectives, the users’ and the developers’ perspective. Special emphasis will be placed on those tools developed specifically for the nine case study locations within the CITI-SENSE project and on the technical elements and frameworks that can be further exploited for the creation of new citizens’ observatories in the future. In addition, this chapter highlights the usage of these tools in order to support citizens’ involvement within environmental monitoring of air quality, particularly for the collection of data and observations via sensors, mobile apps and surveys. This chapter will also touch on analysis and visualisation of observations through software widgets and web portals.


  1. 1.
    Berre, A.I., Joglekar, B., Fernandez, A., et al. (2016). Deliverable D7.6 - Part 3: Citizens’ Observatory Toolbox – Developer perspective. Available at (accessed on 9th August 2017).
  2. 2.
    Borrego, C., Costa, A.M., Ginja, J., et al. (2016). Assessment of air quality microsensors versus reference methods: The EuNetAir joint exercise. Atmospheric Environment 147: 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castell, N., Dauge, F.R., Schneider, P. (2017). Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? Environment International 99: 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castell, N., Kobernus, M., Liu, H.-Y., Schneider, P., Lahoz, W., Berre, A.J., Noll, J. (2015). Mobile technologies and services for environmental monitoring: The Citi-Sense-MOB approach. Urban Climate 14(3): 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fishbain, B., Lerner, U., Castell, N., et al. (2017) An evaluation tool kit of air quality micro-sensing units. Science of the Total Environment 575: 639–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fredriksen, M., Bartonova, A., Kruzevic, Z., Kobernus, M., Liu, H.-Y., Santiago, L., Schneider, P., & Tamilin, A. (2016). CITI-SENSE. Final report on methodology. Deliverable 6.4, Work Package 6 (NILU report, 29/2016). Kjeller: NILU.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grossberndt, S., and Liu, H.-Y. (2016). Citizen participation approaches in environmental health. In Pacyna, J., & Pacyna, E. (Eds.), Environmental Determinants of Human Health (pp 225–248). London, UK: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jovašević-Stojanović, M., Bartonova, A., Topalović, D., et al. (2015). On the use of small and cheaper sensors and devices for indicative citizen-based monitoring of respirable particulate matter. Environmental Pollution 206: 696–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kotsev, A., Pantisano, F., Schade, S., Jirka, S. (2015) Architecture of a Service-Enabled Sensing Platform for the Environment. Sensors 15: 4470–4495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kotsev, A., Schade, S., Craglia, M., Gerboles, M., Spinelle, L., Signorini, M. (2016). Next Generation Air Quality Platform: Openness and Interoperability for the Internet of Things. Sensors 16(3): 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, H.-Y., Bartonova, A., Berre, A., et al. (2015). Deliverable D 4.3 – CITI-SENSE Citizens’ Observatories – Version 1. Restricted to the CITI-SENSE consortium.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, H.-Y., Kobernus, M. (2016). Deliverable D 4.5 – The CITI-SENSE Citizens’ Observatories Web Portal. Available at (accessed on 8th August 2017).
  13. 13.
    Liu, H-Y., Kobernus, M. (2017). Citizen science and its role in the sustainable development. Chapter in the book with title “Analysing the Role of Citizen Science in Modern Research (Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management)”. Ceccaroni, L, and Piera, J (Eds). IGI Globe.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, H-Y., Kobernus, M., Broday, D., and Bartonova, A. (2014). A conceptual approach to a citizens’ observatory - supporting community-based environmental governance. Environ. Health 13:107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moltchanov, S., Levy, I., Etzion, Y., Lerner, U., Broday, D.M., Fishbain, B. (2014). On the feasibility of measuring air pollution by wireless distributed sensor nodes. Sci Total Environ. 502C: 537–547.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Montargil, F., Santos, V. (2017), Citizen Observatories: Concept, Opportunities and Communication with Citizens in the First EU Experiences. In: Paulin A., Anthopoulos L., Reddick C. (eds) Beyond Bureaucracy. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 25. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robinson, J., Kocman, D., Smolnikar, M., Mohorčič, M., Horvat, M. (2014). Empowerment in practice - insights from CITI-SENSE project in Ljubljana. Geophysical Research Abstracts. Vol. 16, EGU General Assembly, EGU2014-5458-1, 2014.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schneider, P., Castell, N., Lahoz, W., Vallejo, I. (2016). Deliverable 6.6 – Data fusion of crowdsourced air quality observations and dispersion model data for urban-scale air quality mapping. Available at (accessed on 8th August 2017).
  19. 19.
    Slørdal, L. H., Solberg, S., andWalker, S. E. (2003). The Urban Air Dispersion Model EPISODE applied in AirQUIS 2003, Technical description, Norwegian Institute for Air Research, NILU TR 12/03, Kjeller, Norway, 2003.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wehn, U., Evers, J. (2015). The social innovation potential of ICT-enabled citizen observatories to increase eParticipation in local flood risk management. Technology in Society 42: 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NILU – Norwegian Institute for Air ResearchKjellerNorway
  2. 2.TECHNION – Israel Institute of TechnologyTechnion City, HaifaIsrael
  3. 3.JSI – Jožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations