Abstract
Species distribution models (SDM) are widely used for ecological research and conservation purposes. Given a set of species occurrence, the aim is to infer its spatial distribution over a given territory. Because of the limited number of occurrences of specimens, this is usually achieved through environmental niche modeling approaches, i.e. by predicting the distribution in the geographic space on the basis of a mathematical representation of their known distribution in environmental space (= realized ecological niche). The environment is in most cases represented by climate data (such as temperature, and precipitation), but other variables such as soil type or land cover can also be used. In this paper, we propose a deep learning approach to the problem in order to improve the predictive effectiveness. Non-linear prediction models have been of interest for SDM for more than a decade but our study is the first one bringing empirical evidence that deep, convolutional and multilabel models might participate to resolve the limitations of SDM. Indeed, the main challenge is that the realized ecological niche is often very different from the theoretical fundamental niche, due to environment perturbation history, species propagation constraints and biotic interactions. Thus, the realized abundance in the environmental feature space can have a very irregular shape that can be difficult to capture with classical models. Deep neural networks on the other side, have been shown to be able to learn complex non-linear transformations in a wide variety of domains. Moreover, spatial patterns in environmental variables often contains useful information for species distribution but are usually not considered in classical models. Our study shows empirically how convolutional neural networks efficiently use this information and improve prediction performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
References
Hutchinson, G. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold spring harbor symposium on quantitative biology. 22, 415–427.
Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. (1986). Generalized Additive Models. Statistical Science, 1(3), 297–318.
Friedman, J. (1991). Multivariate adaptive regression splines. The annals of statistics, 1–67.
Phillips, S., Dudik, M., Schapire, R. (2004). A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning, 83.
Phillips, S., Anderson, R. & Schapire, R. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological modelling, 190(3), 231–259.
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 1097–1105.
Lek, S., Delacoste, M., Baran, P., Dimopoulos, I., Lauga, J. & Aulagnier, S. (1996). Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecological modelling, 90(1), 39–52.
Thuiller, W. (2003). BIOMOD–optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global change biology, 9(10), 1353–1362.
Leathwick, J.R. Elith, J. & Hastie, T. (2006). Comparative performance of generalized additive models and multivariate adaptive regression splines for statistical modelling of species distributions. Ecological modelling, 199(2), 188–196.
LeCun, Y. & others. (1989). Generalization and network design strategies. Connectionism in perspective, 143–155.
Ward, G., Hastie, T., Barry, S., Elith, J. & Leathwick, J. (2009). Presence-only data and the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 65(2), 554–563.
Berman, M., & Turner, T. R. (1992). Approximating point process likelihoods with GLIM. Applied Statistics, 31–38.
P Anderson, R., Dudk, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., J Hijmans, R., Huettmann, F., …& A Loiselle, B. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29(2), 129–151.
Phillips, S. & Dudik, M. (2008). Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31(2), 161–175.
Fithian, W., & Hastie, T. (2013). Finite-sample equivalence in statistical models for presence-only data. The annals of applied statistics.7,4,1917.
Phillips, S. Anderson, R., Dudik, M. Schapire, R. & Blair, M. (2017). Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent. Ecography.
Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G. & Williams, R. and others (1988). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Cognitive modeling, 5(3).
Nair, V. & Hinton, G. (2010). Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), 807–814.
Ioffe, S. & Szegedy, C. (2015). Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. International Conference on Machine Learning. 448–456.
Dutrève, B. & Robert, S. (2016). INPN - Données flore des CBN agrégées par la FCBN. Version 1.1. SPN - Service du Patrimoine naturel, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. Occurrence Dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/omae84 accessed via GBIF.org on 2017-08-30.
Karger, D. N., Conrad, O., Bohner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W. & Kessler, M. (2016). Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.00217.
Karger, D. N., Conrad, O., Bohner, J., Kawohl, T., Kreft, H., Soria-Auza, R.W. & Kessler, M. (2016). CHELSEA climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas (Version 1.1).
Zomer, R., Bossio, D., Trabucco, A., Yuanjie, L., Gupta, D. & Singh, V. (2007). Trees and water: smallholder agroforestry on irrigated lands in Northern India.
Zomer, R., Trabucco, A., Bossio, D. & Verchot, L. (2008). Climate change mitigation: A spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 126(1), 67–80.
Panagos, P. (2006). The European soil database. GEO: connexion, 5(7), 32–33.
Panagos, P., Van Liedekerke, M., Jones, A., Montanarella, L. (2012). European Soil Data Centre: Response to European policy support and public data requirements. Land Use Policy, 29(2),329–338.
Van Liedekerke, M. Jones, A. & Panagos, P. (2006). ESDBv2 Raster Library-a set of rasters derived from the European Soil Database distribution v2. 0. European Commission and the European Soil Bureau Network, CDROM, EUR, 19945.
Chen, T., Li, M., Li, Y., Lin, M., Wang, N., Wang, M., …& Zhang, Z. (2015). Mxnet: A flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.01274.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Botella, C., Joly, A., Bonnet, P., Monestiez, P., Munoz, F. (2018). A Deep Learning Approach to Species Distribution Modelling. In: Joly, A., Vrochidis, S., Karatzas, K., Karppinen, A., Bonnet, P. (eds) Multimedia Tools and Applications for Environmental & Biodiversity Informatics. Multimedia Systems and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76445-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76445-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76444-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76445-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)