Advertisement

Risk and Resilience

  • Marja YlönenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Environmental Sociology and Policy book series (PASTESP)

Abstract

The concepts of risk and resilience have spread to the environmental social sciences and many other disciplines. Nevertheless, the relationship between the concepts often remains ambiguous. This chapter charts the recent developments of the concepts in technical risk assessment and resilience engineering and examines how the environmental social sciences have enriched the understanding of risk and resilience. The technical and social sciences have had different understandings of risk. However, recent developments in technical risk assessment have opened for cross-fertilization between the social sciences and technical risk analysis. This cross-fertilization enhances an in-depth understanding of risks and resilience. It is argued herein that it is fruitful to see the concepts as complementary and to exploit both of them in analyses of the environment and society.

References

  1. Althaus, C. E. (2005). A Disciplinary Perspective on the Epistemological Status of Risk. Risk Analysis, 25(3), 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aven, T. (2014). Risks, Surprises and Black Swans. Fundamental Ideas and Concepts in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Aven, T. (2017). How Some Types of Risk Assessments Can Support Resilience Analysis and Management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 167, 536–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aven, T., & Krohn, B. S. (2014). A New Perspective on How to Understand, Assess and Manage Risk and the Unforeseen. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 121, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2010). Risk Management and Governance. Concepts, Guidelines and Applications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2014). Foundational Issues in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Risk Analysis, 34(7), 1164–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding Regulation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bernstein, B. L. (1996). Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Birkland, T. A., & Waterman, S. (2009). The Politics and Policy Challenges of Disaster Resilience. In C. P. Nemeth, E. Hollnagel, & S. Dekker (Eds.), Resilience Engineering Perspectives: Preparation and Restoration (Vol. 2, pp. 15–38). Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, K., & Westway, E. (2011). Agency, Capacity and Resilience to Environmental Changes: Lessons from Human Development, Well-being and Disasters. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapin, F., III, Folke, D., & Kofinas, G. P. (2009). A Framework for Understanding Change. In F. S. Chapin III, G. P. Kofinas, & C. Folke (Eds.), Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship. Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World (pp. 3–28). New York: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End? Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dekker, S., Cilliers, P., & Hofmeyr, J. H. (2011). The Complexity of Failure: Implications of Complexity Theory for Safety Investigations. Safety Science, 49(6), 939–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duckett, D., Wynne, B., Christley, R. M., Heathwaite, A. L., Mort, M., Austin, Z., Wastling, J. M., Latham, S. M., Alcock, R., & Haygarth, P. (2015). Can Policy Be Risk-Based? The Cultural Theory of Risk and the Case of Livestock Disease Containment. Sociologia Ruralis, 55(4), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fiksel, J. (2017). Sustainability and Resilience: Toward a Systems Approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2(2), 14–21.Google Scholar
  19. Folke, C. (2016). Resilience (Republished). Ecology and Society, 21(4), 44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09088-210444
  20. Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway World: How Globalisation Is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  21. Gross, M. (2016). Risk as Zombie Category: Ulrich Beck’s Unfinished Project of the Non-Knowledge Society. Security Dialogue, 47(5), 386–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansson, S. O. (2009). A Philosophical Perspective on Risk. In R. E. Löfstedt & Å. Boholm (Eds.), Risk (pp. 43–52). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  23. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hollnagel, E. (2009). The Four Cornerstones of Resilience. In Nemeth, C. P., Hollnagel, E., & Dekker, S. (Eds.), Resilience Engineering Perspectives. Vol. 2. Preparation and Restoration (pp. 117–133). Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. G. (2006). Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Hollnagel, E., Pariès, J., Woods, D. D., & Wreathall, J. (2011). Resilience Engineering in Practice. A Guidebook. Ashgate Studies in Resilience Engineering. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  27. Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the Quantitative Definition of Risk. Risk Analysis, 1, 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindley, D. V. (2006). Understanding Uncertainty. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Linkov, I., Fox-Lent, C., Keisler, J., Della-Sala, S., & Siweke, J. (2014). Plagued by Problems. Resilience Lessons from Venice. Environment, Systems, Decision, 34, 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Linnerooth-Bayer, J., & Wahlström, B. (1991). Applications of Probabilistic Risk Assessments: The Selection of Appropriate Tools. Risk Analysis, 11(2), 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Löfstedt, R. E., & Boholm, Å. (2009). The Earthscan Reader on Risk. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  32. McLaughlin, P., & Dietz, T. (2008). Structure, Agency and Environment: Toward and Integrated Perspective on Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 18, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norris, F., Stevens, S., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K., & Pfefferbaum, R. (2008). Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Et of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology., 41, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nowotny, H. (2014). Engaging with the Political Imaginaries of Science: Near Misses and Future Targets. Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olofsson, A., Öhman, S., & Nygren, K. G. (2016). An Intersectional Risk Approach for Environmental Sociology. Environmental Sociology, 2(4), 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pizzo, B. (2015). Problematizing Resilience: Implications for Planning Theory and Practice. Cities, 43, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Redman, C. L. (2014). Should Sustainability and Resilience be Combined or Remain Distinct Pursuits? Ecology and Society, 19(2), 37. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss2/art37/.
  38. Reith, G. (2009). Uncertain Times: The Notion of ‘Risk’ and the Development of Modernity. In R. E. Löfstedt & Å. Boholm (Eds.), Risk (pp. 53–68). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  39. Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance. Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  40. Sarewitz, D. (2004). How Science Make Environmental Controversies Worse. Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. & Lichtenstein S. (1980). Facts and Fears. Understanding Perceived Risk. In Schwing, R. C and Albers, W.A. Jr. Societal Risk Assessment. How Safe Is Safe Enough? General Motors Research Laboratories. Proceedings of the General Motors Symposium on Societal Risk Assessment, held in Warren, Michigan, October, 7–9, 1979. Pp. 181–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. SRA. (2015). Glossary Society for Risk Analysis. Retrieved May 28, 2016, from www.sra.com/resources.
  43. Stoop, J. (2011). No Facts, No Glory. In E. Hollnagel, J. Pariès, D. D. Woods, & J. Wreathall (Eds.), Resilience Engineering in Practice. A Guidebook. Studien in Resilience Engineering (pp. 199–217). Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What Is Organizational Knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genalogies of Resilience. From Systems Ecology to the Political Economy of Crisis Adaptation. Security Dialogue, 14(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Social-Ecological Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in Changing World. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  47. Weick, K. E., & Suthcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the Unexpected Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  48. Wilkinson, C. (2011). Social-Ecological Resilience: Insights and Issues for Planning Theory. Planning Theory, 11(2), 148–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wynne, B. (1996). May the Sheep Safely Graze? In S. Lash, B. Szerszynsky, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity. Towards a New Ecology. London: Sage Publication Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT)EspooFinland

Personalised recommendations