Advertisement

Metabolism

  • Debra J. DavidsonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Environmental Sociology and Policy book series (PASTESP)

Abstract

In this chapter, the uptake of the concept of metabolism by the environmental social sciences is described, including attention to early theoretical treatments that continue to shape metabolic conceptualizations. This is followed by a review of empirical modelling efforts emanating primarily from industrial ecology, and the metabolic critiques of capitalism and unequal ecological exchange developed within ecological economics. The theory of Metabolic Rift introduced by John B. Foster is then discussed, and several critiques of Foster’s work presented. Finally, attention is drawn to recent scholarship that illustrates notable advances and the richness of social metabolism scholarship today. Several nagging challenges remain, however, including the ability to account for agency, and to give equal weight to both social and natural processes, which demands a deeper level of interdisciplinarity.

References

  1. Barles, S. (2010). Society, Energy and Materials: The Contribution of Urban Metabolism Studies to Sustainable Urban Development Issues. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(4), 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bing, F. C. (1971). The History of the Word “Metabolism.”. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 26(2), 158–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, S. (2013). ‘Who’s to Blame for Peru’s Gold-Mining Troubles?’ The New Yorker. Retrieved October 28, from http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/whos-to-blame-for-perus-gold-mining-troubles.
  4. Brukmeier, K. (2016). Social-Ecological Transformation: Reconnecting Society and Nature. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bunker, S. G. (1985). Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burkett, P., & Foster, J. B. (2006). Metabolism, Energy, and Entropy in Marx’s Critique of Political Economy: Beyond the Podolinsky Myth. Theory and Society, 35(1), 109–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caneva, K. (1993). Robert Mayer and the Conservation of Energy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chase-Dunn, C. (1998). Global Formation. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Litttlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Cielo, C., Coba, L., & Vallejo, I. (2016). Women, Nature, and Development in Sites of Ecuador’s Petroleum Circuit. Economic Anthropology, 3(1), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Carbon Metabolism: Global Capitalism, Climate Change, and the Biospheric Rift. Theory and Society, 34(4), 391–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson, D. J. (forthcoming). ‘The Effort Factor: An Adjustment to Our Understanding of Social-Ecological Metabolism in the Era of Peak Oil.’ Social Problems. Accepted March 2017.Google Scholar
  12. Davidson, D. J., & Andrews, J. (2013, March 15). Not All About Consumption. Science, 339, 1286–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson, D. J., Andrews, J., & Pauly, D. (2014). The Effort Factor: Evaluating the Increasing Marginal Impact of Resource Extraction Over Time. Global Environmental Change, 25, 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer-Kowalski, M. (2011). Analyzing Sustainability Transitions as a Shift Between Socio-metabolic Regimes. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Weisz, H. (2016). The Archipelago of Social Ecology and the Island of the Vienna School. In H. Haberl, M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, & V. Winiwarter (Eds.), Social Ecology: Society-Nature Relations Across Time and Space. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s Ecology. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  18. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The Entropy Law in the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Ramos-Martin, J. (2009). Multi-scale Integrated Analysis of Societal and Ecosystem Metabolism (MuSIASEM): Theoretical Concepts and Basic Rationale. Energy, 34(3), 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gross, M. (2004). Human Geography and Ecological Sociology: The Unfolding of a Human Ecology, 1890 to 1930—and Beyond. Social Science History, 28(4), 575–605.Google Scholar
  21. Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., & Winiwarter, V. (Eds.). (2016). Social Ecology: Society-Nature Relations Across Time and Space. Basel: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Heneghan, L. 2012. ‘The Last Great Balancing Act: Eugene Odum and the Strategy of Ecosystem Development.’ Posted June 11 on 10 Things Wrong with Environmental Thinking blog. Retrieved August 19, 2017, from http://10thingswrongwithenvironmentalthought.blogspot.ca/2012/06/last-great-balancing-act-eugene-odum.html.
  23. Hornborg, A. (2006). Footprints in the Cotton Fields: The Industrial Revolution as Time—Space Appropriation and Environmental Load Displacement. Ecological Economics, 59, 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kapp, K. W. (1976). The Open-System Character of the Economy and its Implications. In K. Dopfer (Ed.), Economics in the Future: Towards a New Paradigm (pp. 90–105). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Love, T., & Isenhour, C. (2016). Energy and Economy: Recognizing High-Energy Modernity as a Historical Period. Economic Anthropology, 3(1), 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marriott, J., & Minio-Paluello, M. (2014). The Political and Material Landscape of European Energy Distribution: Tracking the Oil Road. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martinez-Alier, J. (2002). The Environmentalism of the Poor. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marx, K. (1973 [1857–58]). Grundrisse. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  29. Marx, K. (1976 [1867]). Capital (vol. 1). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  30. Moore, J. W. (2011). Transcending the Metabolic Rift: A Theory of Crises in the Capitalist World-Ecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(1), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mumford, L. (1961). The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations and its Prospects. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  32. O’Hara, P. A. (2009). Political Economy of Climate Change, Ecological Destruction and Uneven Development. Ecological Economics, 69(2), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Odum, E. (1969). The Strategy of Ecosystem Development. Science, 164, 262–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Odum, H. T. (1995). Self-Organization and Maximum Empower. In C. A. S. Hall (Ed.), Maximum Power: The Ideas and Applications of H. T. Odum (pp. 311–330). Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  35. Odum, H. T. (1996). Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision-Making. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  36. Odum, H. T. (2007). Environment, Power, and Society for the Twenty-First Century: The Hierarchy of Energy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Odum, H. T., & Odum, E. C. (2001). A Prosperous Way Down. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  38. Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pincetl, S., Bunje, P., & Holmes, T. (2012). An Expanded Urban Metabolism Method: Toward a Systems Approach for Assessing Urban Energy Processes and Causes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3), 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polanyi, K. (1957 [1944]). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. New York: Beacon.Google Scholar
  41. Ramos-Martin, J., Giampietro, M., & Mayumi, K. (2007). On China’s Exosomatic Energy Metabolism: An Application of Multi-scale Integrated Analysis of Societal Metabolism (MSIASM). Ecological Economics, 63(1), 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramos-Martín, J., Canellas-Bolta, S., Giampietro, M., & Gamboa, G. (2009). Catalonia’s Energy Metabolism: Using the MuSIASEM Approach at Different Scales. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4658–4671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rice, J. (2007). Ecological Unequal Exchange: Consumption, Equity, and Unsustainable Structural Relationships Within the Global Economy. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 48(1), 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rudy, A. (2001). Marx’s Ecology and Rift Analysis. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 12(2), 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sager, J. (2016). The Crown Joules: Resource Peaks and Monetary Hegemony. Economic Anthropology, 3(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Salleh, A. (2010). From Metabolic Rift to “Metabolic Value”: Reflections on Environmental Sociology and the Alternative Globalization Movement. Organization & Environment, 23(2), 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sbicca, J. (2014). The Need to Feed: Urban Metabolic Struggles of Actually Existing Radical Projects. Critical Sociology, 40(6), 817–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Schneider, M., & McMichael, P. (2010). Deepening, and Repairing, the Metabolic Rift. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(3), 461–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White, L. (1943). Energy and the Evolution of Culture. American Anthropologist, 45(3), 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wittman, H. (2009). Reworking the Metabolic Rift: La Vía Campesina, Agrarian Citizenship, and Food Sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(4), 805–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolman, A. (1965). The Metabolism of Cities. Scientific American, 213(3), 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang, Y. (2013). Urban Metabolism: A Review of Research Methodologies. Environmental Pollution, 178, 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang, Y., Zheng, H., & Fath, B. D. (2014). Analysis of the Energy Metabolism of Urban Socioeconomic Sectors and the Associated Carbon Footprints: Model Development and a Case Study for Beijing. Energy Policy, 73, 540–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations