In this chapter, the uptake of the concept of metabolism by the environmental social sciences is described, including attention to early theoretical treatments that continue to shape metabolic conceptualizations. This is followed by a review of empirical modelling efforts emanating primarily from industrial ecology, and the metabolic critiques of capitalism and unequal ecological exchange developed within ecological economics. The theory of Metabolic Rift introduced by John B. Foster is then discussed, and several critiques of Foster’s work presented. Finally, attention is drawn to recent scholarship that illustrates notable advances and the richness of social metabolism scholarship today. Several nagging challenges remain, however, including the ability to account for agency, and to give equal weight to both social and natural processes, which demands a deeper level of interdisciplinarity.
- Boyd, S. (2013). ‘Who’s to Blame for Peru’s Gold-Mining Troubles?’ The New Yorker. Retrieved October 28, from http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/whos-to-blame-for-perus-gold-mining-troubles.
- Bunker, S. G. (1985). Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Caneva, K. (1993). Robert Mayer and the Conservation of Energy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Chase-Dunn, C. (1998). Global Formation. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Litttlefield.Google Scholar
- Davidson, D. J. (forthcoming). ‘The Effort Factor: An Adjustment to Our Understanding of Social-Ecological Metabolism in the Era of Peak Oil.’ Social Problems. Accepted March 2017.Google Scholar
- Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Weisz, H. (2016). The Archipelago of Social Ecology and the Island of the Vienna School. In H. Haberl, M. Fischer-Kowalski, F. Krausmann, & V. Winiwarter (Eds.), Social Ecology: Society-Nature Relations Across Time and Space. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
- Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s Ecology. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
- Gross, M. (2004). Human Geography and Ecological Sociology: The Unfolding of a Human Ecology, 1890 to 1930—and Beyond. Social Science History, 28(4), 575–605.Google Scholar
- Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., & Winiwarter, V. (Eds.). (2016). Social Ecology: Society-Nature Relations Across Time and Space. Basel: Springer.Google Scholar
- Heneghan, L. 2012. ‘The Last Great Balancing Act: Eugene Odum and the Strategy of Ecosystem Development.’ Posted June 11 on 10 Things Wrong with Environmental Thinking blog. Retrieved August 19, 2017, from http://10thingswrongwithenvironmentalthought.blogspot.ca/2012/06/last-great-balancing-act-eugene-odum.html.
- Marx, K. (1973 [1857–58]). Grundrisse. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Marx, K. (1976 ). Capital (vol. 1). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Mumford, L. (1961). The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations and its Prospects. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
- Odum, H. T. (1995). Self-Organization and Maximum Empower. In C. A. S. Hall (Ed.), Maximum Power: The Ideas and Applications of H. T. Odum (pp. 311–330). Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
- Odum, H. T. (1996). Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision-Making. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Odum, H. T. (2007). Environment, Power, and Society for the Twenty-First Century: The Hierarchy of Energy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Odum, H. T., & Odum, E. C. (2001). A Prosperous Way Down. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
- Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Polanyi, K. (1957 ). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. New York: Beacon.Google Scholar
- Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar