Advertisement

Spatial Frames and the Quest for Institutional Fit

  • C. S. A. (Kris) van Koppen
  • Simon R. Bush
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Environmental Sociology and Policy book series (PASTESP)

Abstract

Spatial frames play a crucial role in debates over environmental sustainability. Building on a social scientific understanding of space, we discuss key spatial frames in biodiversity and ecosystem management, including territory, social-ecological systems, global networks and flows, and sense of place. In evaluating these frames, we argue that the state with its territorial power has clear limitations in effectively and legitimately addressing ecosystem problems, even when it remains a crucial power-container and regulator. Adapting institutional arrangements to ecosystem scale, as advocates of social-ecological systems propose, is often inappropriate because of cross-scale socio-political dynamics. Given the importance of global flows, we argue that place-based or landscape approaches that bring together local ecosystem management and global value chains present an ambivalent, but highly relevant spatial framing.

References

  1. Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2010). Spatial Planning, Devolution, and New Planning Spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(5), 803–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batterbury, S. P., & Fernando, J. L. (2006). Rescaling Governance and the Impacts of Political and Environmental Decentralization: An Introduction. World Development, 34(11), 1851–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brasser, A. (2013). Olam International and Rainforest Alliance Case Study. Reducing Risk: Landscape Approaches to Sustainable Sourcing. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners.Google Scholar
  5. Brockington, D. (2004). Community Conservation, Inequality and Injustice: Myths of Power in Protected Area Management. Conservation & Society, 2(2), 411–432.Google Scholar
  6. Brondizio, E. S., Ostrom, E., & Young, O. R. (2009). Connectivity and the Governance of Multilevel Social-Ecological Systems: The Role of Social Capital. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, J. C., & Purcell, M. (2005). There’s Nothing Inherent About Scale: Political Ecology, the Local Trap, and the Politics of Development in the Brazilian Amazon. Geoforum, 36(5), 607–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring Environmental Governance: Towards a Politics of Scales and Networks. Political Geography, 24(8), 875–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buscher, B., & Dressler, W. (2007). Linking Neoprotectionism and Environmental Governance: On the Rapidly Increasing Tensions Between Actors in the Environment-Development Nexus. Conservation and Society, 5(4), 586.Google Scholar
  10. Cash, D., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., et al. (2006). Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Tomás, S. (2010). A Review of Design Principles for Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cullingworth, J. B. (2002). The Political Culture of Planning: American Land Use Planning in Comparative Perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Dupuis, E. M., & Vandergeest, P. (Eds.). (1996). Creating the Countryside. The Politics of Rural and Environmental Discourse. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive Governance of Socio-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hajer, M., & Zonneveld, W. (2000). Spatial Planning in the Network Society-Rethinking the Principles of Planning in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 8(3), 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartje, V. J., Klaphake, A., & Schliep, R. (2003). The International Debate on the Ecosystem Approach: Critical Review; International Actors; Obstacles and Challenges. Bonn: BfN.Google Scholar
  19. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (p. 468). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Hein, L. G., Van Koppen, C. S. A., De Groot, R. S., & Van Ierland, E. C. (2006). Spatial Scales, Stakeholders and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. H. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.Google Scholar
  23. Kidd, S., & Shaw, D. (2013). Reconceptualising Territoriality and Spatial Planning: Insights from the Sea. Planning Theory & Practice, 14(2), 180–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kissinger, G., Brasser, A., & Gross, L. (2013). Scoping Study. Reducing Risk: Landscape Approaches to Sustainable Sourcing. Washington, DC: Landscapes for People, Food and Nature Initiative.Google Scholar
  25. Masterson, V., Stedman, R., Enqvist, J., Tengö, M., Giusti, M., Wahl, D., & Svedin, U. (2017). The Contribution of Sense of Place to Social-Ecological Systems Research: A Review and Research Agenda. Ecology and Society, 22(1), 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mol, A. P., & Spaargaren, G. (2006). Towards a Sociology of Environmental Flows: A New Agenda for Twenty-First-Century Environmental Sociology. In A. P. Mol & G. Spaargaren (Eds.), Governing Environmental Flows: Global Challenges to Social Theory (pp. 39–82). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Moore, M. (2012). Natural Resources, Territorial Right, and Global Distributive Justice. Political Theory, 40(1), 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity Hotspots for Conservation Priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neumann, R. P. (1998). Imposing Wilderness. Struggles Over Livelihood and Nature Preservation in Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pimbert, M. P., & Pretty, J. N. (1995). Parks, People and Professionals. Putting “Participation” into Protected Area Management. Geneve: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
  33. Ros-Tonen, M. A., Van Leynseele, Y.-P. B., Laven, A., & Sunderland, T. (2015). Landscapes of Social Inclusion: Inclusive Value-Chain Collaboration Through the Lenses of Food Sovereignty and Landscape Governance. The European Journal of Development Research, 27(4), 523–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schama, S. (1995). Landscape and Memory. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  36. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2005). Handbook of the Convention on Biological Diversity. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  37. Simmons, A. J. (2001). On the Territorial Rights of States. Noûs, 35, 300–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Takacs, D. (1996). The Idea of Biodiversity. Philosophies of Paradise. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. U.N.E.P. (2000). Ecosystem Approach: Description, Principles and Guidelines. UNEP/CBD/COP/5/23. 2000. Decisions Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Fifth Meeting, Nairobi, 15–26 May 2000, Decision V/6: UNEP.Google Scholar
  42. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Vandergeest, P., Ponte, S., & Bush, S. (2015). Assembling Sustainable Territories: Space, Subjects, Objects, and Expertise in Seafood Certification. Environment and Planning A, 47(9), 1907–1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Koppen, C. S. A. (2002). Echte natuur. Een sociaaltheoretisch onderzoek naar natuurwaardering en natuurbescherming in de moderne samenleving. Wageningen: Dissertations Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  45. Van Koppen, C. S. A. (2006). Governing Nature? On the Global Complexity of Biodiversity Conservation. In G. Spaargaren, A. P. J. Mol, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Governing Environmental Flows: Global Challenges to Social Theory (pp. 187–219). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Van Koppen, C. S. A. (2009). Restoring Nature in a Mobile Society. In M. Drenthen, J. Keulartz, & J. Proctor (Eds.), New Visions of Nature. Complexity and Authenticity (pp. 229–236). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vane-Wright, R. I. (1996). Identifying Priorities for the Conservation of Biodiversity: Systematic Biological Criteria Within a Socio-Political Framework. In K. J. Gaston (Ed.), Biodiversity. A Biology of Numbers and Differences (pp. 309–344). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. Warner, J. F., Wester, P., & Hoogesteger, J. (2014). Struggling with Scales: Revisiting the Boundaries of River Basin Management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 1(5), 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams, D. R., & Stewart, S. I. (1998). Sense of Place: An Elusive Concept that Is Finding a Home in Ecosystem Management. Journal of Forestry, 96(5), 18–23.Google Scholar
  50. Wilshusen, P. R., Brechin, S. R., Fortwangler, C. L., & West, P. C. (2002). Reinventing a Square Wheel: Critique of a Resurgent “Protection Paradigm” in International Biodiversity Conservation. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Young, O. R. (2002). The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Young, O. R. (2008). The Architecture of Global Environmental Governance: Bringing Science to Bear on Policy. Global Environmental Politics, 8(1), 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. S. A. (Kris) van Koppen
    • 1
  • Simon R. Bush
    • 1
  1. 1.Wageningen UniversityWageningenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations