Advertisement

Being Riajuu [Open image in new window]

A Phenomenological Analysis of Sentimental Relationships with “Digital Others”
  • Nicola Liberati
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10715)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study the possibility of sentimental relationships between human and digital beings. We are interested in what kind of “other” a digital being can be for a human subject because it is the first step in understanding how our intimate lives will be shaped by the introduction of new digital technologies.

Today computer technologies are growing fast, and they are becoming pervasive. They are intertwining their digital content with every aspect of our everyday lives and they are placing themselves as our “companions”. This co-existence is so tight that it is possible to think of sentimental relationships growing between users and these devices. We will analyse these relationships from a phenomenological perspective by introducing the Japanese term riajuu [ Open image in new window ] which tackles the problem of having a sentimental and intimate relationship with a digital being. Moreover, thanks to Husserl’s phenomenology, we will show how it is important to discern the digital content of the “other” from how this entity relates to the subject.

We will show if the subject can build with a digital other an intimate relationship even when users know it is not a human person they are dealing with.

Keywords

Phenomenology Postphenomenology Human-robot intimate relationships Riajuu 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is supported by the NWO VICI project “Theorizing Technological Mediation: toward an empirical-philosophical theory of technology” (grant number: 277-20-006).

References

  1. 1.
    Amuda, Y.J., Tijani, I.B.: Ethical and legal implications of sex robot: An Islamic perspective. OIDA Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 03(06), 19–28 (2012). http://www.oidaijsd.com/20138/159682/a/ethical-and-legal-implications-of-sex-robot-an-islamic-perspective
  2. 2.
    Benoist, J.: Fulfilment. In: Phenomenology as Grammar, pp. 77–96. Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series (N.S.), De Gruyter (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Capili, A.D.: How do we ‘See’ that which is ‘Invisible’? the stakes in husserl’s account of perceiving the other. KRITIKE Online J. Philos. 7(2), 1–18 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheok, A.D., Levy, D., Karunanayaka, K., Morisawa, Y.: Love and sex with robots. In: Nakatsu, R., Rauterberg, M., Ciancarini, P. (eds.) Handbook of Digital Games and Entertainment Technologies, pp. 833–858. Springer, Singapore (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-50-4_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coeckelbergh, M.: Humans, animals, and robots: a phenomenological approach to human-robot relations. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3(2), 197–204 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costello, P.R.: Layers in Husserl’s Phenomenology: On Meaning and Intersubjectivity. New studies in phenomenology and hermeneutics. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crowell, S.: Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferrari, F., Paladino, M.P., Jetten, J.: Blurring human-machine distinctions anthropomorphic appearance in social robots as a threat to human distinctiveness. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 8(2), 1–16 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0338-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geniusas, S.: Origins of the Horizon in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol. 67. Springer, London (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibson, W.: Neuromancer. HarperCollins, London (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gibson, W.: Spook Country. G. P. Putnam’s Sons Viking Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gibson, W.: Google’s Earth. The New York Times (2010). http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/01/opinion/01gibson.html?_r=0
  13. 13.
    Gyllenhammer, P.: On fulfillment: uncovering the possibility of a new objective insight. Auslegung J. Philos. 24(2), 185–198 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hall, J.R.: Alfred Schutz, his critics, and applied phenomenology. Philos. Soc. Criticism 4(3), 265–279 (1977). http://psc.sagepub.com/content/4/3/265.short Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hauskeller, M.: Sex and the Posthuman Condition. Palgrave Macmillan, Palgrave pivot (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoffman, G., Birnbaum, G.E., Vanunu, K., Sass, O., Reis, H.T.: Robot responsiveness to human disclosure affects social impression and appeal. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction, HRI 2014, pp. 1–8. ACM, New York (2014). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2559636.2559660
  17. 17.
    Husserl, E.: Analysen zur passiven Synthesis aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten, 1918–1926, Husserliana, vol. XI. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag (1966)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Husserl, E.: Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Erster Teil. 1905–1920, Husserliana, vol. XIII. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag (1973)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Husserl, E.: Phantasie, Bildbewußtsein, Erinnerung. Husserliana, vol. XXIII. Springer, Heidelberg (1980)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Husserl, E.: Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band, Erster Teil, Husserliana, vol. XIX/1. Nijhoff/Kluwer, Den Haag (1984)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kahn Jr., P.H., Ruckert, J.H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Reichert, A., Gary, H., Shen, S.: Psychological intimacy with robots? using interaction patterns to uncover depth of relation. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction, HRI 2010, pp. 123–124. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2010). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1734454.1734503
  22. 22.
    Böhle, K., Pfadenhauer, M.: Of social robots and artificial companions. Contributions from the social sciences. Sci. Technol. Innov. Stud. 10(1), 199 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    León, F., Zahavi, D.: Phenomenology of experiential sharing: The contribution of Schutz and Walther. In: Salice, A., Schmid, H.B. (eds.) The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality. SPS, vol. 6, pp. 219–234. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levinas, E.: Totalité et infini: essai sur l’extériorité. LGF (1990)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Levy, D.: Robot prostitutes as alternatives to human sex workers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Robotics (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Levy, D.: Love and sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper Collins (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levy, D.: The ethical treatment of artificially conscious robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(3), 209–216 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0022-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liberati, N.: Improving the embodiment relations by means of phenomenological analysis on the “reality” of ARs. In: 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities (ISMAR-AMH), pp. 13–17 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lotz, C.: Depiction and plastic perception. A critique of Husserl’s theory of picture consciousness. Cont. Philos. Rev. 40(2), 171–185 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Markoff, J.: What the Dormouse Said: How the 60s Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer. Viking Adult, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McIntyre, R., Smith, D.W.: Theory of intentionality. In: Mohanty, J.N., McKenna, W.R. (eds.) Husserl’s Phenomenology, pp. 147–179. Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America (1989)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Samani, H.A., Parsani, R., Rodriguez, L.T., Saadatian, E., Dissanayake, K.H., Cheok, A.D.: Kissenger: design of a kiss transmission device. In: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS 2012, pp. 48–57. ACM, New York (2012). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2317956.2317965
  33. 33.
    Schütz, A.: Collected Papers: The Problem of Social Reality. Phaenomenologica, vol. 11. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague (1962)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schütz, A.: The Phenomenology of the Social World. Northwestern University Press, Evanston (1967)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schütz, A.: Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy. Phaenomenologica, vol. 22. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague (1970)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Scriven, P.: A phenomenology of the “other” in computer game worlds. Games Cult. 1–18 (2015)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sullins, J.P.: Robots, love, and sex: the ethics of building a love machine. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 3(4), 398–409 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Verbeek, P.P.: Beyond interaction: a short introduction to mediation theory. Interactions XXII(3), 26–31 (2015). http://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/may-june-2015/beyond-interaction
  39. 39.
    Wakabaiyashi, D.: Only in Japan, real men go to a hotel with virtual girlfriends. Wall Street J. (2010). https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703632304575451414209658940
  40. 40.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Sci. Am. 265(3), 66–75 (1991). http://www.ubiq.com/hypertext/weiser/SciAmDraft3.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yeoman, I., Mars, M.: Robots, men and sex tourism. Futures 44(4), 365–371 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yoshimi, J.: Husserlian Phenomenology: A Unifying Interpretation. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of TwenteEnschedeNetherlands

Personalised recommendations