Solving the Problem of Distribution of Fiscal Coupons by Using a Steady State Genetic Algorithm

  • Qëndresë Hyseni
  • Sule Yildirim Yayilgan
  • Bujar Krasniqi
  • Kadri SylejmaniEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 735)


When customers buy goods or services from business entities they are usually given a receipt that is known with the name fiscal or tax coupon, which, among the others, contains details about the value of the transaction. In some countries, the fiscal coupons can be collected during a certain period of time and, at the end of the collection period, they can be handed over to the tax authorities in exchange for a reward, whose price depends on the number of collected coupons and the sum of their values. From the optimisation perspective, this incentive becomes interesting when, both the number of coupons and the sum of their value is large. Hence, in this paper, we model this problem in mathematical terms and devise a test set that can be used for benchmarking purposes. Furthermore, we propose a solution based on Genetic Algorithms, where we compare its results versus the results to the solution of the relaxed versions of the proposed problem. The computational experiments indicate that the proposed solution obtains promising results for complex problem instances, which show that the proposed algorithm can be used to solve realistic problems in a matter of few seconds by utilizing standard personal computers.


Distribution of fiscal coupons Mathematical modelling Genetic algorithms 


  1. 1.
    Tax Administration of Kosovo: Tax Administration of Kosovo, February 2015.
  2. 2.
    Chekuri, C., Khanna, S.: A polynomial time approximation scheme for the multiple knapsack problem. SIAM J. Comput. 35(3), 713–728 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, Y., Hao, J.-K.: Memetic search for the generalized quadratic multiple knapsack problem. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 20(6), 908–923 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yeoh, W., Felner, A., Koenig, S.: BnB-ADOPT: an asynchronous branch-and-bound DCOP algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 2 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mailler, R., Lesser, V.: Solving distributed constraint optimization problems using cooperative mediation. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karmarkar, N., Karp, R.M.: An efficient approximation scheme for the one-dimensional bin-packing problem. In: 23rd Annual Symposium on SFCS 2008. IEEE (1982)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kızıltan, Z., Hnich, B.: Symmetry breaking in a rack configuration problem. In: IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Modelling and Solving Problems with Constraints (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whitley, D., Kauth, J.: GENITOR: a different genetic algorithm. In: 1988 Rocky Mountain Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luke, S.: Essentials of Metaheuristics, 2nd edn. Lulu (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qëndresë Hyseni
    • 1
  • Sule Yildirim Yayilgan
    • 2
  • Bujar Krasniqi
    • 1
  • Kadri Sylejmani
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of PrishtinaPrishtinaKosovo
  2. 2.Department of Information Security and Communication TechnologyNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyGjøvikNorway

Personalised recommendations