A Meta-modeling Approach to Create a Multidimensional Business Knowledge Model Based on BPMN

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 736)

Abstract

Business processes are everywhere. To be more efficient, organizations look for a good business process modeling. In this way, to model a business process, the are a lot of knowledge which are responsible to present a part of the process in a good level of understanding. However, the issue to be addressed in this paper is how to formalize implicit pieces of knowledge figured in the business process so as to construct a business knowledge model which will be treat in a high understanding level. This paper contributes with a meta-modeling approach that the principle is to transform a business process model to a business knowledge model. The purpose of such an approach is to provide a way to automatically build a business ontology based on easy processing of business knowledge dimensions.

Keywords

Knowledge Multi-dimension Business process modeling Meta-models M2M ATL Business ontology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is in the memory of Mr. Lotfi Bouzguenda who provided insight and expertise which greatly assisted the research for two years but he suddenly passed away.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.M.: Trends in business process analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), pp. 12–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cherfi, S.S.S., Ayad, S., Comyn-Wattiau, I.: Improving business process model quality using domain ontologies. JoDS J. Data Semant. 2, 75–87 (2013). Special issue on Evolution and Versioning in Semantic Data Integration SystemsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ouali, S., Mhiri, M.B.A., Gargouri, F.: Knowledge engineering for business process modeling, pp. 81–90 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jablonski, S., Bussler, C.: Workflow management: modeling concepts, architecture and implementation (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sveiby, K.E.: The New Organizational Wealth: Managing & Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ouali, S., Mhiri, M., Bouzguenda, L.: A multidimensional knowledge model for business process modeling. Procedia Comput. Sci. 96, 654–663 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engels, G., Heckel, R., Küster, J.M.: Rule-based specification of behavioral consistency based on the UML meta-model. In: International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language, pp. 272–286. Springer (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benjamins, V.R., Radoff, M., Davis, M., Greaves, M., Lockwood, R., Contreras, J.: Semantic technology adoption: a business perspective. In: Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, pp. 619–657. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Havel, J.M., Steinhorst, M., Dietrich, H.A., Delfmann, P.: Supporting terminological standardization in conceptual models-a plugin for a meta-modelling tool (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leopold, H., Eid-Sabbagh, R.H., Mendling, J., Azevedo, L.G., Baião, F.A.: Detection of naming convention violations in process models for different languages. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 310–325 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barba, I., Weber, B., Del Valle, C., Jiménez-Ramírez, A.: User recommendations for the optimized execution of business processes. Data Knowl. Eng. 86, 61–84 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Born, M., Brelage, C., Markovic, I., Pfeiffer, D., Weber, I.: Auto-completion for executable business process models. In: International Conference on Business Process Management, pp. 510–515. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith, F., Bianchini, D.: Selection, ranking and composition of semantically enriched business processes. Comput. Ind. 65(9), 1253–1263 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zahaf, S., Gargouri, F.: The urbanized bid process information system. Procedia Comput. Sci. 112, 874–885 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Antoniou, G., Franconi, E., Van Harmelen, F.: Introduction to semantic web ontology languages. In: Reasoning Web, pp. 1–21. Springer (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heidari, F., Loucopoulos, P., Kedad, Z.: A quality-oriented business process meta-model. In: Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation, pp. 85–99. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Model, B.P.: Notation (BPMN) version 2.0. OMG Specification, Object Management Group (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Uba, R., Dijkman, R.: Business process model merging: an approach to business process consolidation. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 22(2), 11 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chhun, S., Cherifi, C., Moalla, N., Ouzrout, Y.: Business process implementation using an ontology-driven web service selection algorithm. In: 5th Journées Francophones sur les Ontologies (JFO 2014) (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gao, X., Liu, Z., Zhao, Y., Chen, Z., Li, A., Xu, B., Shen, B.: BPM-driven educational informationization technology. (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bazoun, H., Zacharewicz, G., Ducq, Y., Boye, H.: Transformation of extended actigram star to BPMN2. 0 and simulation model in the frame of model driven service engineering architecture. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation-DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium, Society for Computer Simulation International, p. 20 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jouault, F., Allilaire, F., Bézivin, J., Kurtev, I.: ATL: a model transformation tool. Sci. Comput. Program. 72(1), 31–39 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hewelt, M., Kunde, A., Weske, M., Meinel, C.: Recommendations for medical treatment processes: the PIGS approach. In: International Conference on Business Process Management, pp. 16–27. Springer (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SfaxSfaxTunisia
  2. 2.MIR@CL LaboratoryTechnopark of SfaxSfaxTunisia

Personalised recommendations