Advertisement

An Hierarchical Framework for Classroom Events Classification

  • D. S. Guru
  • N. Vinay Kumar
  • K. N. Mahalakshmi Gupta
  • S. D. Nandini
  • H. N. Rajini
  • G. Namratha Urs
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 736)

Abstract

In this paper, a model for classroom events classification is proposed. Major classroom events which are considered in this work are drowsiness of a student, group discussion, steady and alert, and noisy classroom. These events are classified using a two level classification model. It makes use of simple threshold based classifiers for classification. In the first level, classes such as noisy classroom and drowsiness are separated from that of remaining classes based on global threshold. The global threshold is computed based on correlation coefficients, computed across the intensity values of the video frames. The correlation scores obtained from each video are used for classification. During second level, a partially labeled video is classified as a member of any of the said four classes based on the local threshold computed from each class of videos. Local threshold is computed based on the global characteristics extracted from the videos. For classification purpose, the events which are considered here are strictly mutually exclusive events. Due to the lack of classroom events video datasets, the dataset has been created consisting of 96 videos spread across 4 different classes. The proposed model is validated using suitable validity measures viz., accuracy, precision, recall, and f-measure. The results show that the proposed model performs better in classifying the said events.

Keywords

Classroom events Statistical features Threshold based classifier 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the support rendered by IISc Bangalore for providing the VADS resources. The second author would also acknowledge the Department of Science & Technology, INDIA, for their financial support through DST-INSPIRE fellowship.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang, L., Li, S.Z., Yuan, X., Xiang, S.: Real-time object classification in video surveillance based on appearance learning. In: 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2007, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guru, D.S., Manjunath, S., Kiranagi, B.B.: SVARS: Symbolic video archival and retrieval system. In: Bangalore Compute Conference, vol. 4, pp. 1–9 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vijayakumar, V., Nedunchezhian, R.: A study on video data mining. Int. J. Multimed. Inf. Retrieval 1(3), 153–172 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guru, D.S., Dallalzadeh, E., Manjunath, S.: A symbolic approach for classification of moving vehicles in traffic videos. ICPRAM 2, 351–356 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhaumik, H., Bhattacharyya, S., Nath, M.D., Chakraborty, S.: Hybrid soft computing approaches to content based video retrieval: a brief review. Appl. Soft Comput. 46, 1008–1029 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kotikalapudi, U.K.: Abnormal event detection in video, M. Tech Thesis. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cui, L., Li, K., Chen, J., Li, Z.: Abnormal event detection in traffic video surveillance based on local features. In: Image and Signal Processing (CISP), pp. 362–366 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhong, H., Shi, J., Visontai, M.: Detecting unusual activity in video. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. II-819-II-826 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gong, Y., Han, M., Hua, W., Xu, W.: Maximum entropy model based baseball highlight detection and classification. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 96(2), 181–199 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fleischman, M., Roy, D.: Temporal feature induction for baseball highlight classification. In: Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, pp. 333–336 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harikrishna, N., Sanjeev, S., Sriram, D.S.: Automatic summarization of cricket video events using genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Oregon, USA, pp. 2051–2054 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burman, P.: A comparative study of ordinary cross-validation, v-fold cross-validation and the repeated learning-testing methods. Biometrika 76, 503–514 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tahmasbi, A., Saki, F., Shokouhi, S.B.: Classification of benign and malignant masses based on zernike moments. Comput. Biol. Med. 41(8), 726–735 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duda, O.R., Hart, E.P., Stork, G.D.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. S. Guru
    • 1
  • N. Vinay Kumar
    • 1
  • K. N. Mahalakshmi Gupta
    • 1
  • S. D. Nandini
    • 1
  • H. N. Rajini
    • 1
  • G. Namratha Urs
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Studies in Computer ScienceUniversity of MysoreMysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations