Advertisement

A Study of the Privacy Attitudes of the Users of the Social Network(ing) Sites and Their Expectations from the Law in India

  • Sandeep Mittal
  • Priyanka Sharma
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 736)

Abstract

In an era of information revolution and Web 2.0 technologies, the Social Network(ing) Sites (SNSs) have become a popular medium for the freedom of expression, the networking and maintaining the networks with the strangers and known others. A large amount of personal data is disclosed by the users intentionally or unknowingly on these social networking sites. The protection of this data at residence and in motion and its further processing by SNSs and their third parties is a cause of concern. In the present study, the attitude of Indian users of SNSs towards data privacy and their expectations from law in India have been explored and analyzed to validate the need for creation of a data privacy law in India. This study would provide timely guidance for policy makers who are currently engaged in framing a data protection framework on the directions of Supreme Court of India by following due process of law.

Keywords

Information privacy Data privacy attitude Data privacy law 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, H.J., Dinev, T., Xu, H.: Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Q. 35, 989–1016 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    “Justice K S Puttaswamy v Union of India,” Supreme Court of India (Nine Judges Constitutional Bench) (2017). http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/pdf/LU/ALL%20WP(C)%20No.494%20of%202012%20Right%20to%20Privacy.pdf
  3. 3.
    Altman, I.: The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding (1975) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Margulis, S.T.: Conceptions of privacy: current status and next steps. J. Social Issues 33, 5–21 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellison, N.B.: Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 13, 210–230 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards, L.: Privacy, law, code and social networking sites. In: Research Handbook on Governance of the Internet, p. 309 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yao, M.Z.: Self-protection of online privacy: a behavioral approach. In: Privacy Online, pp. 111–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: The influence of attitudes on behavior. In: The Handbook of Attitudes, vol. 173, p. 31 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gross, R., Acquisti, A.: Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, pp. 71–80 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strater, K., Richter, H.: Examining privacy and disclosure in a social networking community. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, pp. 157–158 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S., Passerini, K.: Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: a comparison of Facebook and MySpace. In: AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, p. 339 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J.P., Horn, A.-K., Hughes, B.N.: Facebook and online privacy: attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 15, 83–108 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ellison, N.B., Vitak, J., Steinfield, C., Gray, R., Lampe, C.: Negotiating privacy concerns and social capital needs in a social media environment. In: Trepte, S., Reinecke, L. (eds.) Privacy Online, pp. 19–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    LaRose, R., Mastro, D., Eastin, M.S.: Understanding Internet usage: a social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 19, 395–413 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tufekci, Z.: Grooming, gossip, Facebook and MySpace: what can we learn about these sites from those who won’t assimilate? Inf. Commun. Soc. 11, 544–564 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mahapatra, D.: Supreme Court for 3-tier right to privacy: intimate, private and public. The Times of India edition, New Delhi (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Special Eurobarometer 359: Attitudes on Data Protection and Electronic Identity in the European Union (2011). http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_359_en.pdf
  18. 18.
    Serbetar, I., Sedlar, I.: Assessing reliability of a multi-dimensional scale by coefficient alpha. Revija za Elementarno Izobrazevanje 9, 189 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NICFS (MHA)New DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Raksha Shakti UniversityAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations