Skip to main content

Magēma kenek: On Future and Certainty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Making and Meaning of Relationships in Sri Lanka

Part of the book series: Culture, Mind, and Society ((CMAS))

  • 208 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the notion of magēma kenek, an idea akin to someone of my own. The chapter illustrates that stability in the form of certainty was a key requirement of serious love relationships, which my interlocutors deemed as ‘serious relationships’. The supposition was that life is full of contingencies and that certainty in itself is a contingency. My interlocutors chose to navigate life’s managing uncertainty by making it liveable through exclaiming a sense of direction—a couple relationship that would lead to marriage. They were hoping effectively by interjecting their couple relationships with palpability through a long-drawn process of building a ‘serious relationship’ to which trust becomes integral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Æmberella is a tropical fruit, which is eaten raw as well as cooked as a curry or made into chutney.

  2. 2.

    It could be argued that, it is that Hishani’s boyfriend still lived with his parents, where his mother played the primary role of the nurture giver and if Hishani and her boyfriend shared residence, it may be that Hishani would become the nurture giver, as it is what is expected of her.

  3. 3.

    At times, I could not help but wonder why my interlocutors trusted me with their stories, for they did not know me. Later, I realised that, trust indeed takes different forms in different relationships and above all, attached to trust is also an assessment of potential for damage/compromise. Since I was not from their world, it might have been fine for them to let me in on some things about their lives. The cost of this is that this does not pave the way for lasting relationships. This explains why some of them did not seem too keen on keeping in touch, and looking back at the stories I was told, I realised that they were the ones who did not try to hold themselves back when sharing their stories.

  4. 4.

    Instances such as these left me confused, for while they appeared as acts of love and care —he wants her to focus on her education—such instances were also illustrative examples for control and power their boyfriends exerted on my female interlocutors. To whatever extent possible, I have attempted to suppress my discomfort and give prominence to my interlocutors’ accounts.

  5. 5.

    Dhananjaya’s admission brought to light a methodological challenge I failed to overcome in the research as my line of questioning ended up urging Dhananjaya to reflect and intellectualise his emotional life.

References

  • Cancian, F. M. (1986). The feminization of love. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11(4), 692–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, R. (2006). Kiss or tell? Declaring love in Hindi films. In F. Orsini (Ed.), Love in South Asia: A cultural history (pp. 289–302). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, M. (2014). Trust in the face of uncertainty: A qualitative study of intersubjective trust and risk. International Review of Sociology, 24(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.894335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamaachchi, L. (1998). Lingikathwaya haa vivahaya: Jeevithaya gana dana ganimu. Colombo: Wijesuriya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, H. (2000). Sentiment and substance in north Indian forms of relatedness. In J. Carsten (Ed.), Cultures of relatedness: New approach to the study of kinship (pp. 73–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1993). Risk: A sociological theory. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, G. (2001). The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35(2), 403–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. W. (1962). Introduction: George H. Mead as social psychologist and social philosopher. In C. W. Morris (Ed.), Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, L. (2009). The suicidal wound and fieldwork among Canadian Inuit. Being there: The fieldwork encounter and the making of truth (pp. 55–76). Berkley: University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (2001). Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago and London: University of Chicago press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trawick, M. (1992). Notes on love in a Tamil family. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihirini Sirisena .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sirisena, M. (2018). Magēma kenek: On Future and Certainty. In: The Making and Meaning of Relationships in Sri Lanka. Culture, Mind, and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76336-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics