Advertisement

Gender Identities

  • Natalie N. Castañeda
  • Carla A. Pfeffer
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

In the following reading, we provide an overview of prevailing approaches to the study of gender identities across multiple disciplines. For the purposes of this chapter we focus on biological, psychological, and sociocultural approaches to gender identities, across which exists considerable overlap. Within the biological sciences, there is a focus on genetics, hormones, and physiology to determine gender identity. Psychological approaches examine evolutionary foundations for gender-linked characteristics, sensitive periods across the lifecourse, and gender schemata. Sociocultural approaches concentrate on the construction of gender and gender identities, how they are experienced and enacted, and their intersections with social institutions and culture. Some theories within this approach aim to deconstruct gender, gender identities, and provoke greater consideration of gender fluidity in cultures across the globe. Biological, psychological, and sociocultural approaches to understanding gender identities are by no means mutually exclusive and we discuss the critical importance of engaging in multi- and interdisciplinary empirical and theoretical dialogues. We close the chapter by considering possible future directions for innovative theoretical and empirical work on gender identities in the twenty-first century.

Keywords

Gender Gender identity Identity Sex Transgender 

References

  1. Bell, N. J., & Carver, W. (1980). A reevaluation of gender label effects: Expectant mothers’ responses to infants. Child Development, 51, 925–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bressert, S. (2016). Gender dysphoria symptoms. Psych Central. Retrieved on October 19, 2016, from http://psychcentral.com/disorders/gender-dysphoria-symptoms/.
  4. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50(3), 164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre journal, 40(4), 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brubaker, R. (2016). Trans: Gender and race in an age of unsettled identities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, Patricia Hill. (1993). Toward a new vision: race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex & Class, 1(1), 25–45.Google Scholar
  10. Cooley, C. H. (1902). The human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, G. (2015). Contesting intersex: The dubious diagnosis. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  12. de Beauvoir, S. (2005 [1949]). The second sex. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  13. Diamond, M. (2002). Sex and gender are different: Sexual identity and gender identity are different. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 7(3), 320–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dickerson, C. (2015). The linguistic expression of gender identity: Albania’s “sworn virgins.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Toronto: York University Toronto.Google Scholar
  15. Elson, J. (2004). Am I still a woman? Hysterectomy and gender identity. Philadelphia University Press: Temple.Google Scholar
  16. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1993). The five sexes: Why male and female are not enough. The Sciences, 2(March/April), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). The five sexes, revisited. Sciences, 40(4), 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4(3), 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. International Commission of Jurists (ICJ). (2007). Yogyakarta principles: Principles on the application of international human rights law in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity. Available from: http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/principles_en.pdf.
  20. Kane, E. (2012). The gender trap: Parents and the pitfalls of raising boys and girls. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Khan, S. I., Hussain, M. I., Parveen, S., Bhuiyan, M. I., Gourab, G., Sarker, G. F., et al. (2009). Living on the extreme margin: Social exclusion of the transgender population (hijra) in Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 27(4), 441–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children’s sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccody (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Levitt, H. M., & Hiestand, K. R. (2004). A quest for authenticity: Contemporary butch gender. Sex Roles, 50(9–10), 605–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lucal, B. (1999). What it means to be gendered me: Life on the boundaries of a dichotomous gender system. Gender & Society, 13(6), 781–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological bulletin, 128(6), 903–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin, K. A. (2005). William wants a doll. Can he have one? Feminists, child care advisors, and gender-neutral child rearing. Gender & Society, 19(4), 456–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, P. Y. (2004). Gender as social institution. Social Forces, 82(4), 1249–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2004). Recognizing the centrality of gender identity and stereotype knowledge in gender development and moving toward theoretical integration: Reply to Bandura and Bussey. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 702–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mirandé, A. (2016). Hombres mujeres: An indigenous third gender. Men and Masculinities, 19(4), 384–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore, M. R. (2008). Gendered power relations among women: A study of household decision-making in Black, lesbian stepfamilies. American Sociological Review, 73, 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Owens, T. J., Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2010). Three faces of identity. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 477–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pascoe, C. J. (2011). Dude, you’re a fag. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pfeffer, C. A. (2017). Queering families: The postmodern partnerships of cisgender women and transgender men. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pfeffer, C. A., Rogalin, C. L., & Gee, C. A. (2016). Masculinities through a cross-disciplinary lens: Lessons from sociology and psychology. Sociology Compass, 10(8), 652–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18(4), 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scherrer, K., & Pfeffer, C. A. (2016). None of the above: Toward identity and community-based understandings of (a)sexualities. Archives of sexual behavior. Online first  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0900-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schilt, K., & Westbrook, L. (2009). Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: “Gender normals”, transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender & Society, 23(4), 440–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seavey, C. A., Katz, P. A., & Zalk, S. R. (1975). Baby X. Sex Roles, 1(2), 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Segal, E. S. (2003). Cultural constructions of gender. In Encyclopedia of sex and gender (pp. 3–10). USA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shapiro, E. (2010). Gender circuits: Bodies and identities in a technological age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  47. Towle, E. B., & Morgan, L. M. (2002). Romancing the transgender native: Rethinking the use of the “third gender” concept. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies8(4), 469–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turner, Bryan S. (1992). Regulating bodies: Essays in medical sociology. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vasey, P. L., VanderLaan, D. P., Gothreau, L. M., & Bartlett, N. H. (2011). Traits of separation anxiety in childhood: A retrospective study of Samoan men, women, and fa’afafine. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(3), 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ward, J. (2015). Not gay: Sex between straight white men. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2014). Doing gender, determining gender transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society, 28(1), 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender & Society, 23(1), 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations