Advertisement

Does Biology Limit Equality?

  • Shannon N. DavisEmail author
  • Alysia Blake
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

This chapter provides a brief overview of theory and research that has investigated the relationship between physiology and gender difference with an eye toward understanding the role that biology may play in facilitating or inhibiting social equality. We present one extended example that simultaneously examined biological and social theories as structuring individual-level variation in women’s personality traits to document the complicated interplay of the biological and the social across the life course. We extend our analysis to discuss implications for the study of race and acknowledge the benefical contributions that intersex and transgender individuals’ experiences bring to bear on the study of the relationship between physiology and gender difference. We conlude by noting that though the road to equality is hard and paved with setbacks, it is not bound by biology.

Keywords

Physiology Gender difference Biology Social inequality Gender structure at the individual-level 

References

  1. Arnold, A. P. (2009). Mouse models for evaluating sex chromosome effects that cause sex differences in non-gonadal tissues. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 21, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, A. P., & Breedlove, S. M. (1985). Organizational and activational effects of sex steroids on brain and behavior: A reanalysis. Hormones and Behavior, 19, 469–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, A. P., & Chen, X. (2009). What does the “four core genotypes” mouse model tell us about sex differences in the brain and other tissues? Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 30, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, J. B., Berkley, K. J., Geary, N., Hampson, E., Herman, J., & Young, E. (Eds.). (2008). Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, R. (2015). The emperor’s new genes science, public policy, and the allure of objectivity. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 661(1), 130–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berenbaum, S. A., Blakemore, J. E. O., & Beltz, A. M. (2011). A role for biology in gender-related behavior. Sex Roles, 64, 804–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blakemore, J. E. O., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S. (2009). Gender development. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, C. M., Eccles, J. S., & Becker, J. B. (1992). Are adolescents the victims of raging hormones: Evidence for activational effects of hormones on moods and behavior at adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 62–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Champagne, F. A. (2008). Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 29, 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, M. M., & Galef, B. G. (1998). Effects of intrauterine position on the behavior and genital morphology of litter-bearing rodents. Developmental Neuropsychology, 14, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen-Bendahan, C. C. C., van de Beek, C., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2005). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behaviors: Methods and findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review, 29, 353–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Connell, C. (2010). Doing, undoing, or redoing gender? Learning from the workplace experiences of transpeople. Gender & Society, 24(1), 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, G. (2015). Contesting intersex: The dubious diagnosis. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, G., & Murphy, E. L. (2013). Intersex bodies as states of exception: An empirical explanation for unnecessary surgical modification. Feminist Formations, 25(2), 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, S. N., & Risman, B. J. (2015). Feminists wrestle with testosterone: Hormones, socialization, and cultural expectations as predictors of women’s gendered selves. Social Science Research, 49, 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Medeiros, C. B., Rees, S. L., Llinas, M., Fleming, A. S., & Crews, D. (2010). Deconstructing early life experiences: Distinguishing the contributions of prenatal and postnatal factors to adult male sexual behavior in the rat. Psychological Science, 21, 1494–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 33–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., Hanish, L. D., Anders, M. C., & MaddenDerdich, D. A. (2003). Early school competence: The roles of sexsegregated play and effortful control. Developmental Psychology, 39, 848–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fabes, R. A., Shepard, A. S., Guthrie, I. K., & Martin, C. L. (1997). Roles of temperamental arousal and gender segregated play in young children’s social adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 693–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  22. Galambos, N. L., Berenbaum, S. A., & McHale, S. M. (2009). Gender development in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Vol. 1: Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 305–357). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London: Macmillan and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibber, J. R., & Goy, R. W. (1985). Infant-directed behavior in young rhesus monkeys: Sex differences and effects of prenatal androgens. American Journal of Primatology, 8, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., Horton, N. J., Makris, N., Kennedy, D. N., Caviness, V. S., et al. (2001). Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gowaty, P. A. (2003). Sexual natures: How feminism changed evolutionary biology. Signs, 28, 901–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goy, R. W., & McEwen, B. S. (1980). Sexual differentiation of the brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grön, G., Wunderlich, A. P., Spitzer, M., Tomczak, R., & Riepe, M. W. (2000). Brain activation during human navigation: Gender different neural networks as substrate of performance. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 404–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, G. S. (1905). Adolescence. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  30. Hamann, S., & Canli, T. (2004). Individual differences in emotional processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hampson, E. (2007). Endocrine contributions to sex differences in visuospatial perception and cognition. In J. B. Becker, K. J. Berkley, N. Geary, E. Hampson, J. Herman, & E. Young (Eds.), Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior (pp. 311–328). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hrdy, S. B. (1997). Raising Darwin’s consciousness: Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 8, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jordan-Young, R. M. (2010). Brain storm. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jordan-Young, R., & Rumiati, R. I. (2012). Hardwired for sexism? Approaches to sex/gender in neuroscience. Neuroethics, 5(3), 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kennelly, I., Merz, S., & Lorber, L. (2001). What is gender? American Sociological Review, 66, 598–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lenroot, R. K., Gogtay, N., Greenstein, D. K., Wells, E. M., Wallace, G. L., Clasen, L. S., et al. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. NeuroImage, 15, 1065–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Maki, P. M., & Sundermann, E. (2009). Hormone therapy and cognitive function. Human Reproduction Update, 15, 667–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin, P. Y. (2004). Gender as social institution. Social Forces, 82, 1249–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthews, J. S., Ponitz, C. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 689–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., Dolezal, C., Baker, S. W., Ehrhardt, A. A., & New, M. I. (2006). Gender development in women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia as a function of disorder severity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 667–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller, E., & Costello, C. Y. (2001). The limits of biological determinism. American Sociological Review, 66, 592–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Money, J., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (1972). Man and woman, boy and girl: Differentiation and dimorphism of gender identity from conception to maturity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Morning, A. (2014). And you thought we had moved beyond all that: Biological race returns to the social sciences. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 1676–1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nordenström, A., Servin, A., Bohlin, G., Larsson, A., & Wedell, A. (2002). Sex-typed toy play behavior correlates with the degree of prenatal androgen exposure assessed by CYP21 genotype in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 87, 5119–5124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parish, A. R., & De Waal, F. B. M. (2000). The other “closest living relative”: How bonobos (Pan paniscus) challenge traditional assumptions about females, dominance, intra- and intersexual interactions, and hominid evolution. In D. LeCroy & P. Moller (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human reproductive behavior (pp. 97–113). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  48. Pasterski, V. L., Geffner, M. E., Brain, C., Hindmarsh, P., Brook, C., & Hines, M. (2005). Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toy play in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Development, 76, 264–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pembrey, M., Bygren, L., Kaati, G., Edvinsson, S., Northstone, K., Sjöström, M. et al. (2006). Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14, 159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Phoenix, C. H., Goy, R. W., Gerall, A. A., & Young, W. C. (1959). Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology, 65, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Phoenix, C. H., Slob, A. K., & Goy, R. W. (1973). Effects of castration and replacement therapy on sexual behavior of adult male rhesuses. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 84, 472–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pomerantz, S. M., Roy, M. M., Thornton, J. E., & Goy, R. W. (1985). Expression of adult female patterns of sexual behavior by male, female, and pseudohermaphroditic female rhesus monkeys. Biology of Reproduction, 33, 878–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Puts, D. A., Cárdenas, R. A., Bailey, D. H., Burriss, R. P., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2010). Salivary testosterone does not predict mental rotation performance in men or women. Hormones and Behavior, 58, 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Quetelet, L. A. J. (1830/1969). A treatise on man and the development of his faculties (R. Knox & F. L Gainesville, Trans.). Scholars Facsimiles and Reprints. (Original work published 1830; trans. 1842).Google Scholar
  55. Resnick, S. M. (2006). Sex differences in regional brain structure and function. In P. W. Kaplan (Ed.), Neurologic disease in women (2nd ed., pp. 15–26). New York: Demos Medical Publications.Google Scholar
  56. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Risman, B. J. (1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Risman, B. J. (2001). Calling the bluff of value-free science. American Sociological Review, 66, 605–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18, 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ross, J., Roeltgen, D., & Zinn, A. (2006). Cognition and the sex chromosomes: Studies in turner syndrome. Hormone Research, 65, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rutter, M., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2006). Gene–environment interplay and psychopathology: Multiple varieties but real effects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 226–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Susman, E. J., & Dorn, L. D. (2009). Puberty: Its role in development. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Vol. 1: Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 116–151). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  63. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  64. Udry, J. R. (2000). Biological limits of gender construction. American Sociological Review, 65, 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wade, L. (2013). The new science of sex difference. Sociology Compass, 7(4), 278–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender & Society, 9(1), 8–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2014). Doing gender, determining gender: Transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society, 28(1), 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wittig, M. A. (1976). Sex differences in intellectual functioning: How much of a difference do genes make? Sex Roles, 2, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Census BureauPrince George’sUSA

Personalised recommendations