Skip to main content

Intersectionality and Gender Theory

Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

Intersectionality is a black feminist theory of power that recognizes how multiple systems of oppression, including racism, patriarchy, capitalism, interact to disseminate disadvantage to and institutionally stratify different groups. Born out of black women’s theorizations of their experiences of racism, sexism, and economic disadvantage from enslavement to Jim Crow to the post-civil rights era, the theory accounts for how systems of oppression reinforce each other, and how their power must be understood not as individually constituted but rather as co-created in concert with each other. Sociologists of gender adopted and adapted intersectionality widely in the 1990s, using the theoretical lens to account for their own standpoint and positionality in the research process as well as to expand their analyses to include the experiences of people who were disadvantaged across multiple systems of oppression. The popularity and utility of intersectionality as a theory, both within sociology and beyond, has in some ways obscured its emphasis on interlocking systems of structural power and domination. Yet, gender theorists are positively positioned to return power to the center of analyses of inequality and to cover new substantive ground in research on oppression.

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Race
  • Theory
  • Structure

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_5
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-76333-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    Legal scholar Crenshaw (1989, 2015) coined the term “intersectionality” to account for how discrimination law, as well as measures to address discrimination, lacked the ability to understand how two systems—racism and patriarchy in this instance—operated together to disadvantage black women and render their distinct experiences of discrimination invisible.

References

  • Andersen, M. (2005). Thinking about women: A quarter century’s view. Gender & Society, 19(4), 437–455.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, B. M. (1993). Invisible Southern black women leaders in the civil rights movement: The Triple constraints of gender, race, and class. Gender and Society, 7(2), 162–182.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beale, F. M. (1969). Double Jeopardy: To be female and black. Words of fire: An anthology of black feminist thought. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bettie, J. (2002). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 312–325.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, B. (1987). The race for theory. Cultural Critique, 6, 51–63.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1995). Symposium on West and Fenstermaker’s doing difference. Gender & Society, 4(9), 491–494.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Combahee River Collective. (1983). A black feminist statement. In B. Smith (Ed.), Home girls: A Black feminist anthology (p. 264). New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. J. (1892). A voice from the South: By a black woman of the South. North Carolina: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., & Vanneman, R. (2003). The effects of occupational gender segregation across race. The Sociological Quarterly, 44(1), 17–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (September 24, 2015). Why intersectionality can’t wait. The Washington Post. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2015/09/24/why-intersectionality-cant-wait/.

  • Davis, A. Y. (1983). Women, race, and class. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillaway, H., & Broman, C. (2001). Race, class, and gender difference in marital satisfaction and divisions of household labor among dual-earner couples: A case for intersectional analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 309–327.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Genovese, E. (1988). Within the plantation household: Black and white women of the old south. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. J., & Massey, D. S. (2004). The ecology of racial discrimination. City and Community, 3(3), 221–241.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, J., & Moon, D. (2004). The sociology of sexualities: Queer and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 47–64.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, L. (1996). Homeboys, babies, men in suits: The state and the reproduction of male dominance. American Sociological Review, 759–778.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, E. B. (1993). Righteous discontent: The women’s movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880–1920. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, D. C. (1989). Rape and the inner lives of Black women in the Middle West. Signs, 14, 912–920.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. ([1861]1987). Incidents in the life of a slave girl, written by herself. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarmon, R. (2013). Black girls are from the future: Essays on race, digital creativity, and pop culture. Devon: Jarmon Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. P. (2005). Quare’ studies, or (almost) everything i know about Queer studies I learned from my grandmother. In E. P. Johnson & M. G. Henderson (Eds.), Black Queer studies: A critical anthology (pp. 124–157). Durham: Duke University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. C. (1949). An end to the neglect of the problems of the Negro Woman. In B. Guy-Sheftall (Ed.), Words of fire: An anthology of African-American feminist thought (pp. 108–123). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (1988). Multiple Jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs, 1409(1), 42–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, K. R. (2007). Blue-chip black: Race, class, and status in the new black middle class. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. A. (2013). Intersectionality as a method: A note. Signs, 38(4), 1019–1030.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (2008). Gendered power relations among women: A study of household decision making in black, lesbian step families. American Sociological Review, 73, 335–356.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (1983). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, P. (1970). The liberation of black women. In B. Guy-Sheftall (Ed.), Words of fire: An anthology of African-American feminist thought (pp. 186–197). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattillo, M. (2013[1999]). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the Black middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozner, J. (2010). Reality bites back: The troubling truth about guilty pleasure TV. Boston: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, L. W., Adelman, R. M., & Jaret, C. (2007). Women, race, and ethnicity: Exploring earnings differentials in Metropolitan America. City and Community, 6(2), 137–156.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (1997). Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpless, R. (2010). Cooking in other women’s kitchens: Domestic workers in the south, 1865–1960. North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, G. (2005). American sociological association race, gender, and class section survey report. Race, Gender, and Class, 12(1), 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells-Barnett, I. (1995). The Memphis diary of Ida B. Wells. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender & Society, 9(1), 8–37.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. G. (1999). Ar’n’t I a woman?: Female slaves in the plantation South. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A. C. (2004). Puerto Rican Wannabes sexual spectacle and the marking of race, class, and gender boundaries. Gender & Society, 18(1), 103–121.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, A. H. (2009). Racializing the glass elevator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society, 23(1), 5–26.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zandria F. Robinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Robinson, Z.F. (2018). Intersectionality and Gender Theory. In: Risman, B., Froyum, C., Scarborough, W. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76332-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76333-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)