Skip to main content

Intersectionality and Gender Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of Gender

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Intersectionality is a black feminist theory of power that recognizes how multiple systems of oppression, including racism, patriarchy, capitalism, interact to disseminate disadvantage to and institutionally stratify different groups. Born out of black women’s theorizations of their experiences of racism, sexism, and economic disadvantage from enslavement to Jim Crow to the post-civil rights era, the theory accounts for how systems of oppression reinforce each other, and how their power must be understood not as individually constituted but rather as co-created in concert with each other. Sociologists of gender adopted and adapted intersectionality widely in the 1990s, using the theoretical lens to account for their own standpoint and positionality in the research process as well as to expand their analyses to include the experiences of people who were disadvantaged across multiple systems of oppression. The popularity and utility of intersectionality as a theory, both within sociology and beyond, has in some ways obscured its emphasis on interlocking systems of structural power and domination. Yet, gender theorists are positively positioned to return power to the center of analyses of inequality and to cover new substantive ground in research on oppression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Legal scholar Crenshaw (1989, 2015) coined the term “intersectionality” to account for how discrimination law, as well as measures to address discrimination, lacked the ability to understand how two systems—racism and patriarchy in this instance—operated together to disadvantage black women and render their distinct experiences of discrimination invisible.

References

  • Andersen, M. (2005). Thinking about women: A quarter century’s view. Gender & Society, 19(4), 437–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, B. M. (1993). Invisible Southern black women leaders in the civil rights movement: The Triple constraints of gender, race, and class. Gender and Society, 7(2), 162–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beale, F. M. (1969). Double Jeopardy: To be female and black. Words of fire: An anthology of black feminist thought. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettie, J. (2002). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 312–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, B. (1987). The race for theory. Cultural Critique, 6, 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1995). Symposium on West and Fenstermaker’s doing difference. Gender & Society, 4(9), 491–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combahee River Collective. (1983). A black feminist statement. In B. Smith (Ed.), Home girls: A Black feminist anthology (p. 264). New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. J. (1892). A voice from the South: By a black woman of the South. North Carolina: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., & Vanneman, R. (2003). The effects of occupational gender segregation across race. The Sociological Quarterly, 44(1), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (September 24, 2015). Why intersectionality can’t wait. The Washington Post. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/in-theory/wp/2015/09/24/why-intersectionality-cant-wait/.

  • Davis, A. Y. (1983). Women, race, and class. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillaway, H., & Broman, C. (2001). Race, class, and gender difference in marital satisfaction and divisions of household labor among dual-earner couples: A case for intersectional analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Genovese, E. (1988). Within the plantation household: Black and white women of the old south. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. J., & Massey, D. S. (2004). The ecology of racial discrimination. City and Community, 3(3), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, J., & Moon, D. (2004). The sociology of sexualities: Queer and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, L. (1996). Homeboys, babies, men in suits: The state and the reproduction of male dominance. American Sociological Review, 759–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, E. B. (1993). Righteous discontent: The women’s movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880–1920. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, D. C. (1989). Rape and the inner lives of Black women in the Middle West. Signs, 14, 912–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. ([1861]1987). Incidents in the life of a slave girl, written by herself. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarmon, R. (2013). Black girls are from the future: Essays on race, digital creativity, and pop culture. Devon: Jarmon Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. P. (2005). Quare’ studies, or (almost) everything i know about Queer studies I learned from my grandmother. In E. P. Johnson & M. G. Henderson (Eds.), Black Queer studies: A critical anthology (pp. 124–157). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. C. (1949). An end to the neglect of the problems of the Negro Woman. In B. Guy-Sheftall (Ed.), Words of fire: An anthology of African-American feminist thought (pp. 108–123). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (1988). Multiple Jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs, 1409(1), 42–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, K. R. (2007). Blue-chip black: Race, class, and status in the new black middle class. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. A. (2013). Intersectionality as a method: A note. Signs, 38(4), 1019–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (2008). Gendered power relations among women: A study of household decision making in black, lesbian step families. American Sociological Review, 73, 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraga, C., & AnzaldĂşa, G. (1983). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, P. (1970). The liberation of black women. In B. Guy-Sheftall (Ed.), Words of fire: An anthology of African-American feminist thought (pp. 186–197). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattillo, M. (2013[1999]). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the Black middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozner, J. (2010). Reality bites back: The troubling truth about guilty pleasure TV. Boston: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, L. W., Adelman, R. M., & Jaret, C. (2007). Women, race, and ethnicity: Exploring earnings differentials in Metropolitan America. City and Community, 6(2), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (1997). Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpless, R. (2010). Cooking in other women’s kitchens: Domestic workers in the south, 1865–1960. North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, G. (2005). American sociological association race, gender, and class section survey report. Race, Gender, and Class, 12(1), 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells-Barnett, I. (1995). The Memphis diary of Ida B. Wells. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender & Society, 9(1), 8–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. G. (1999). Ar’n’t I a woman?: Female slaves in the plantation South. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A. C. (2004). Puerto Rican Wannabes sexual spectacle and the marking of race, class, and gender boundaries. Gender & Society, 18(1), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, A. H. (2009). Racializing the glass elevator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society, 23(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zandria F. Robinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Robinson, Z.F. (2018). Intersectionality and Gender Theory. In: Risman, B., Froyum, C., Scarborough, W. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76332-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76333-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics