Feminists Reshaping Gender

  • Alison Dahl CrossleyEmail author
  • Laura K. Nelson
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)


The gender order is incredibly durable, and persists relatively unchanged despite major cultural and structural changes. Feminists, however, have collectively mobilized to change some aspects of the gender structure. Over hundreds of years, participants in the U.S. feminist movement have advanced women’s position in the workplace, home, and economy. Feminists have challenged social institutions such as the nuclear family, interpersonal relationships privileging men, and the gender binary. Over the years, feminists helped win woman suffrage, they shaped social policy during the New Deal, they helped win the right to birth control and safe and accessible abortion, they raised awareness about the harms of sexual harassment and gendered violence, and helped draft and pass laws around equal pay and access to work, among other wins. Using a range of tactics, from community-based groups, to protest and Internet organizing, feminists have unquestionably improved women’s position in society. Scholarship about feminist movements has also pushed social movement scholarship in new directions, emphasizing a diversity of targets and tactics, focusing on movement continuity over time, and foregrounding the importance of community-building and other extra-political activities in the maintenance and growth of social movements. Areas for additional research include a deeper empirical and theoretical analysis of the intersectional nature of feminism and more attention to the heterogeneity of women’s experiences. Greater methodological diversity in the study of feminist movements would offer a more robust understanding of the movement, including a better grasp of the cultural and discursive outcomes of feminist movements and those like them.


Gender Feminism Feminist movement Social movement 


  1. Armstrong, E. A. (2002). Forging gay identities: Organizing sexuality in san francisco, 1950–1994. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, E. A. (2013). Gender and neoliberalism: The all india democratic women’s association and globalization politics. New York City: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26, 74–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bail, C. A. (2014). The cultural environment: Measuring culture with big data. Theory and Society, 43(3–4), 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banaszak-Holl, J., Levitsky, S. R., & Zald, M. N. (2010). Social movements and the transformation of American health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumgardner, J. (2011). F ‘Em!: Goo goo, gaga, and some thoughts on balls. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bloemraad, I., Silva, F., & Voss, K. (2016). Rights, economics, or family? Frame resonance, political ideology, and the immigrant rights movement. Social Forces (January, sov123).
  8. Cassell, J. (1977). A group called women: Sisterhood and symbolism in the feminist movement. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
  9. Clemens, E. S. (1993). Organizational repertoires and institutional change: Women’s groups and the transformation of U.S. politics, 1890–1920. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 755–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cobble, D. S. (2005). The other women’s movement: Workplace justice and social rights in modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Crossley, Alison Dahl. (2015). Facebook feminism: Social media, blogs, and new technologies of contemporary U.S. feminism. Mobilization, 20(2), 253–269.Google Scholar
  12. Crossley, A. D., & Taylor, V. (2015). Abeyance cycles in social movements. In movements in times of democratic transition. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Crossley, A. D. (2017). Finding feminism: Millennial activists and the unfinished gender revolution. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Crossley, A. D., Taylor, V., Whittier, N., & Pelak, C. (2011). Forever feminism: Contemporary US feminism from 1960–2011. In V. Taylor, L. J. Rupp, & N. Whittier (Eds.), Feminist frontiers (9th ed., pp. 498–516). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  15. DuBois, E. C. (1971). Feminism old wave and new wave. CWLU Herstory Project.
  16. Duncan, B. (2005). Searching for a home place: Online in the third wave. In J. Reger (Ed.), Different wavelengths: Studies of the contemporary women’s movement (pp. 161–178). Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
  17. Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender and Society, 24(2), 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans, S. (1980). Personal politics: The roots of women’s liberation in the civil rights movement and the new left. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  20. Ferree, M. M., & Hess, B. B. (1995). Controversy and coalition: The new feminist movement across four decades of change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Ferree, M. M., & Martin, P. Y. (Eds.). (1995). Feminist organizations: Harvest of the new women’s movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fonow, M. M. (2003). Union women: Forging feminism in the united steelworkers of America. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Firestone, S. (1968). The women’s rights movement in the U.S.A: New view. Notes from the First Year. (pp. 1–11) New York: The New York Radical Women.Google Scholar
  24. Gelb, J., & Palley, M. L. (1996). Women and public policies: Reassessing gender politics. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  25. Hurwitz, H. M. K., & Taylor, V. (2018). Women occupying wall street: Gender conflict and feminist mobilization. In L. A. Banaszak & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), 100 years of the nineteenth amendment: An appraisal of women’s political activism. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Katzenstein, M. (1998). Faithful and fearless: Moving feminist protest inside the church and military. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lemons, J. S. (1973). The woman citizen: Social feminism in the 1920s. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  28. McAdam, D. (1988). Freedom summer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McAdam, D., & Boudet, H. (2012). Putting social movements in their place: Explaining opposition to energy projects in the United States, 2000–2005. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCammon, H. J. (2012). Explaining frame variation: More moderate and radical demands for women’s citizenship in the U.S. women’s jury movements. Social Problems, 59(1), 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCaughey, M., & Ayers, M. D. (2003). Cyberactivism: On-line activism in theory and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Meyer, D. A., & Whittier, N. (1994). Social movement spillover. Social Problems, 41(2), 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2, 12(3), 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A., & Torres, L. (1991). Third world women and the politics of feminism. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Moraga, C., & Anzaldua, G. (Eds.). (1984). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (2nd ed.). New York: Kitchen Table/Women of Color Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nelson, L. K. (2017). Computational grounded theory: A Methodological Framework. Sociological Methods & Research.
  38. Nelson, L. K. (2018). Feminism means more than a changed world … it means the creation of a new consciousness in women: Feminism, consciousness-raising, and continuity between the waves. In L. A. Banaszak & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), 100 Years of the nineteenth amendment: An appraisal of women’s political activism. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nip, J. Y. M. (2004). The queer sisters and its electronic bulletin board: A study of the internet for social movement mobilization. Information, Communication and Society, 7, 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raeburn, N. C. (2004). Changing corporate America from inside out: Lesbian and gay workplace rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ray, R. (1999). Fields of protest: Women’s movements in India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  42. Reger, J. (2002). Organizational dynamics and the construction of multiple feminist identities in the national organization for women. Gender & Society, 16(5), 710–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reger, J. (Ed.). (2005). Different wavelengths: Studies of the contemporary women’s movement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Reger, J. (2012). Everywhere and nowhere: Contemporary feminism in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rojas, F. (2007). From black power to black studies: How a radical social movement became an academic discipline. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rosen, R. (2000). The world split open: How the modern women’s movement changed America. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  47. Roth, B. (2004). Separate roads to feminism: Black, chicana, and white feminist movements in America’s second wave. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (1987). Survival in the doldrums: The American women’s rights movement, 1945–the 1960s. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (1993). Women’s culture and lesbian feminist activism: A reconsideration of cultural feminism. Signs, 19(1), 32–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shaw, F. (2012). ‘HOTTEST 100 WOMEN’ Cross-platform discursive activism in feminist blogging networks. Australian Feminist Studies, 27(74), 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snow, D. A., Zurcher L. A., Ekland-Olson, S. (1980). Social networks and social movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment. American Sociological Review, 45(5):787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Staggenborg, S. (1996). The survival of the women’s movement: Turnover and continuity in bloomington, Indiana. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 1(2), 143–158.Google Scholar
  53. Staggenborg, S. (1998). Social movement communities and cycles of protest: The emergence and maintenance of a local women’s movement. Social Problems, 45(2), 180–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Staggenborg, S., & Taylor, V. (2005). Whatever happened to the women’s movement? Mobilization, 10(1), 37–52.Google Scholar
  55. Staggenborg, S., & Lecomte, J. (2009). Social movement campaigns: Mobilization and outcomes in the montreal women’s movement. Mobilization, 14(2), 405–422.Google Scholar
  56. Stombler, M., & Padavic, I. (1997). Sister acts: Resisting men’s domination in black and white fraternity little sister programs. Social Problems, 44, 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stryker, S. (2007). Transgender feminism. In S. Gillis, G. Howie, & R. Munford (Eds.), Third wave feminism (pp. 59–70). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sulik, G. (2010). Pink ribbon blues: How breast cancer culture undermines women’s health. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Taylor, V. (1989). Social movement continuity: The Women’s Movement in Abeyance. American Sociological Review, 54(5):761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, J., & de Laat, K. (2013). Feminist internships and the depression of political imagination: Implications for women’s studies. Feminist Formations, 25(1), 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, V. (1996). Rock-a-by baby: Feminism, self-help, and postpartum depression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Taylor, V., & Whittier, N. (1992). Collective identity in social movement communities: Lesbian feminist mobilization. In A. D. Morris & C. M. C Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 104–129). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Van Dyke, N., Soule, S. A., & Taylor, V. (2004). The targets of social movements: Beyond a focus on the state. In D. J. Meyers & D. M. Cress (Eds.), Authority in contention, volume 25 of research in social movements, conflict and change (pp. 27–51). Oxford: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  64. Walker, R. (1995). To be real: Telling the truth and changing the face of feminism. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  65. Walker, A. (2003). In search of our mothers’ gardens: Womanist prose (Reprint ed.). Orlando: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  66. Ware, S. (1987). Beyond suffrage: Women in the new deal. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Whittier, N. (1995). Feminist generations: The persistence of the radical women’s movement. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations