Advertisement

Parenting and Gender

  • Emily W. KaneEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

This chapter explores the sociological literature on the many ways in which parenting is both gendered and gendering. That exploration attends to the intersections of gender with other dimensions of inequality and the interconnections among gendered and gendering patterns at the individual, interactional, and institutional levels. Specific topics include definitions of parenthood, paths into parenthood, parenting labor, links between parenting and paid employment, social policy, and parenting as it shapes and is shaped by children’s gender. Along with a review of key themes and patterns in the literature related to these specific topics, the chapter offers a discussion and suggestions for future directions. The literature has become more attentive, over time, to intersectionality, queer and trans issues, men and masculinities, and challenges to the gender binary. Future work should continue to deepen these more recent directions, and continue to emphasize power as a central organizing element of intersecting structures of inequality. Ongoing consideration of neoliberalism as a context in which family and household patterns are constructed is also suggested, as is a commitment to feminist public engagement and social change.

Keywords

Parents Childcare Family policy Intersectionality 

References

  1. Baker, D. L., & Drapela, L. A. (2010). Mostly the mother. Social Science Journal, 47, 578–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass, B. C. (2015). Preparing for parenthood. Gender & Society, 29, 362–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, A. V. (2009). It’s way out of my league. Gender & Society, 23, 688–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berk, S. (1985). The gender factory. NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, M. (2015). Same-sex marriage and the future of the LGBT movement. Gender & Society, 29, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2007). Changing rhythms of American family life. NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Blum, L. (2015). Raising generation Rx. NY: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brush, L. (2011). Poverty, battered women and work in U.S. public policy. NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budig, M., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Budig, M. J., & Hodges, M. J. (2010). Differences in disadvantage: Variation in the motherhood penalty across white women’s earnings distribution. American Sociological Review, 75, 705–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, J. L., & Mayer, V. (2010). Both hands tied. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Coltrane, S. (1996). Family man. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coltrane, S., & Adams, M. (2008). Gender and families. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  15. Coontz, S. (1992). The way we never were. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Coontz, S. (2015). CCF symposium on housework, gender and parenthood: Overview. Council on Contemporary Families Online Symposium on Housework, Gender and Parenthood. https://contemporaryfamilies.org/housework-symposium-overview/. Accessed July 22, 2016.
  17. Cooper, M. (2014). Cut adrift. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Correll, S., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2013). Parental leisure time: A gender comparison in five countries. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society., 20, 329–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Damaske, S. (2011). For the family?. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2011). Promises I Can Keep. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Edin, K., & Nelson, T. (2013). Doing the Best I Can. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. (2002). Global woman. NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  24. Elliott, S., Powell, R., & Brenton, J. (2015). Being a good mom: Low-income, black single mothers negotiate intensive mothering. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. England, P., Budig, M., & Folbre, N. (2002). Wages of virtue: The relative pay of carework. Social Problems, 49, 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Enos, S. (2001). Mothering from the inside. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fox, B. (2009). When couples become parents: The creation of gender in the transition to parenthood. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  28. Frederick, A. (2017). Risky mothers and the normalcy project. Gender & Society, 31, 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Glauber, R. (2007). Marriage and the motherhood wage penalty among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 951–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haney, L. A. (2010). Offending women. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hansen, K. (2004). Not-so-nuclear families. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hays, S. (2004). Flat broke with children. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hegewisch, A., & DuMonthier, A. (2016). The gender wage gap: 2015. www.iwpr.org/publications/pubs/gender-wage-gap2015. Accessed October 30, 2016.
  36. Hertz, R. (2008). Single by chance, mothers by choice. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hoang, L. A., & Yeoh, B. S. (2011). Breadwinning wives and “left-behind” husbands: Men and masculinities in the Vietnamese transnational family. Gender & Society, 25, 717–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  39. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2001). Domestica. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kane, E. W. (2012). The gender trap. NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kane, E. W. (2014). The social construction of parental gender preferences. In H. Montgomery (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in childhood studies. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kaufman, G. (2013). Superdad. NY: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MacDonald, C. (2010). Shadow mothers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. McLanahan, S., & Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Messner, M. (2009). It’s all for the kids. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. Moen, P., & Roehling, P. (2005). The career mystique. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Litttlefield.Google Scholar
  47. Moore, M. (2011). Invisible families. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Natalier, K., & Hewitt, B. (2014). Separated parents reproducing and undoing gender through defining legitimate uses of child support. Gender & Society, 28, 904–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Offer, S., & Schneider, B. (2011). Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns. American Sociological Review, 76, 809–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Orloff, A. S. (2009). Gender the comparative analysis of welfare states. Sociological Theory, 27, 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parreñas, R. (2002). Servants of globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pfeffer, C. (2012). Normative resistance and inventive pragmatism. Gender & Society, 26, 574–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raley, S., & Bianchi, S. (2006). Sons, daughters, and family processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Randles, J. M. (2013). Repackaging the package deal. Gender & Society, 27, 864–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ray, R., Gornick, J. C., & Schmitt, J. (2010). Who cares? Assessing generosity and gender equality in parental leave policy designs in 21 countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rehel, E. M. (2014). When dad stays home too. Gender & Society, 28, 110–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reich, J. (2005). Fixing families. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Reich, J. A. (2014). Neoliberal mothering and vaccine refusal. Gender & Society, 28, 679–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Risman, B. J. (1998). Gender vertigo. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure. Gender & Society, 18, 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2013). Penalizing men who request a family leave. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 322–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ryan, M., & Berkowitz, D. (2009). Constructing gay and lesbian parent families ‘beyond the closet’. Qualitative Sociology, 32, 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sanchez, L., & Thompson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers. Gender & Society, 11, 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sayer, L. (2015). The complexities of interpreting changing household patterns. https://contemporaryfamilies.org/complexities-brief-report/. Accessed July 22, 2016.
  65. Scott, E. K. (2010). I Feel As If I Am the One Who Is Disabled. Gender & Society, 24, 672–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shows, C., & Gerstel, N. (2009). Fathering, class, and gender. Gender & Society, 23, 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Singley, S. G., & Hynes, K. (2005). Transitions to parenthood. Gender & Society, 19, 376–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  69. Stone, P. (2008). Opting out. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sullivan, M. (2004). The family of woman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  71. Walzer, S. (1998). Thinking about the baby. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Yavorsky, J. E., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2015). The production of inequality: The gender division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage & Family, 77, 662–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bates CollegeLewistonUSA

Personalised recommendations