Advertisement

Gender as a Social Structure

  • Barbara J. RismanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

In this chapter, I provide a history of gender theory in the social sciences. I highlight major themes for explaining apparent gender differences and inequality. While there are many different theories, my conceptual intervention illustrates how seemingly competing paradigms should be synthesized into a holistic integrative theoretical framework that I call gender structure theory. I argue that factors contributing to gender inequality include those at the individual, interactional, and macro level of human society. At each level of analysis, we must attend to material and cultural processes. Understanding gender as a social structure requires us to focus on dynamism in the system: a change at any given level of analysis may reverberate to others. While gender inequality is ubiquitous, change may originate at the individual, interactional or macro level of analysis, and via material or cultural processes. How change happens in the gender structure is an empirical question and one requiring more research in the future.

Keywords

Gender Theory Culture Gender structure 

References

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acker, J. (1992). From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21, 565–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, J., & Padamsee, T. (2001). Signs and regimes: Rereading feminist work on welfare states. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 8, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, E. (2012). Shifting masculinities in Anglo-American Countries. Masculinities and Social Change, 1, 20–40.Google Scholar
  7. Arnold, A. P., & Gorski, R. A. (1984). Gonadal-steroid induction of structural sex-differences in the central nervous system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 7, 413–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A., & Waters, R. (1963). Social learning and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  9. Beland, D. (2005). Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 39, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beland, D. (2009). Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 701–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell, W. B. (1916). The sex complex: A study of the relationship of the internal secretions to the female characteristics and functions in health and disease. London: Baillière, Tindall & Cox.Google Scholar
  12. Bem, S. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bem, S. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Berger, P. L., & Thomas, L. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  15. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blair-Loy, M. (2005). Competing devotions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Booth, A., Granger, D., Mazur, A., & Kivlighan, K. (2006). Testosterone and social behavior. Social Forces, 85, 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Booth, A., Shelley, G., Mazur, A., Tharp, G., & Kittock, R. (1989). Testosterone and winning and losing in human competition. Hormones and Behavior, 23, 556–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Brizendine, L. (2006). The female brain. New York: Morgan Road Books.Google Scholar
  22. Browne, I., & England, P. (1997). Oppression from within and without in sociological theories: An application to gender. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 17, 77–104.Google Scholar
  23. Brush, L. D. (2002). Changing the subject: Gender and welfare regime studies. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 9, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Budig, M. (2002). Male advantage and the gender composition of jobs: Who rides the glass escalator? Social Problems, 49, 258–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Budig, M., Misra, J., & Boeckmann, I. (2012). The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective: The importance of work-family policies and cultural attitudes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 19, 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Cahill, Larry. (2003). Sex- and hemisphere-related influences on the neurobiology of emotionally influenced memory. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 27, 1235–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chatillon, A. H., Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2018). “Gender ideologies” in handbook of the sociology of gender, second edition. In J. Barbara (Ed.), Risman, Carissa Froyum, and William J. Scarborough: Springer Press.Google Scholar
  30. Chavez, K., & Wingfield, A. H. (2018). Racializing Gendered Interactions. In B. J. Risman, C. Froyum, & J. William (Eds.), The springer handbook of the sociology of gender. Scarborough: Springer Press.Google Scholar
  31. Choi, N., & Fuqua, D. R. (2003). The structure of the Bem sex role inventory: A summary report of 23 validation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 872–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Choi, N., & Newman, J. L. (2008). The bem sex-role inventory: Continuing theoretical problems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 800–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Collaer, M. L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychological Bulletin, 118, 55–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black Feminist Thought. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Collins, P. H. (1998). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  36. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Cooke, B., Hegstrom, C. D., Villeneuve, L. S., & Breedlove, S. M. (1998). Sexual differentiation of the vertebrate brain: Principles and mechanisms. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 19, 323–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Crawley, S., Foley, L., & Shehan, C. (2007). Gendering bodies. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1, 139–167.Google Scholar
  41. Davis, G., & Evans, M. J. (2018). Surgically shaping sex: A gender structure analysis of the violation of intersex people’s human rights. In B. J. Risman, C. Froyum, & J. William (Eds.), The springer handbook of the sociology of gender. Scarborough. Springer Press.Google Scholar
  42. Davis, S., & Blake, A. (2018). Does biology limit equality? In B. J. Risman, C. Froyum, & J. William (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of gender, second edition. Scarborough. Springer Press.Google Scholar
  43. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2013). Why study housework? Cleaning as a window into power in couples. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Davis, S. N., & Risman, B. J. (2014). Feminists wrestle with testosterone: Hormones, socialization and cultural interactionism as predictors of women’s gendered selves. Social Science Research, 49, 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94(3), 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21, 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Diamond, M. (2009). Clinical implications of the organizational and activational effects of hormones. Hormones and Behaviors, 55, 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Edwards, A. L., & Ashworth, C. D. (1977). A replication study of item selection for the bem sex role inventory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ely, R., & Padavic, I. (2007). A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1121–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ely, R. (2016). Sometimes the social becomes personal gender, class, and sexualities. American Sociological Review, 81, 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ely, R., Allison, P., Li, S., Mark, N., Thompson, J., Budig, M. J., et al. (2007). Why are some academic fields tipping toward female? The sex composition of U.S. fields of doctoral degree receipt, 1971–2002. Sociology of Education, 80, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. England, P. (2016). Sometimes the social becomes personal: Gender, class and sexualities. American Sociological Review, 81(1), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. England, P., Allison, P., Li, S., Mark, N., Thompson, J., Budig, M. J., & Sun, H. (2007). Why are some academic fields tipping toward female? Sociology of Education, 80, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Epstein, C. F. (1988). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: aids, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  56. Evans, H. M. (1939). Endocrine glands: Gonads, pituitary and adrenals. Annual Review of Physiology, 1, 577–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  58. Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ferree, M. M., & Hall, E. J. (1996a). Rethinking stratification from a feminist perspective: Gender, race, and class in mainstream textbooks. American Sociological Review, 61(6), 929–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ferree, M. M., & Hall, E. J. (1996b). Rethinking stratification from a feminist perspective: Gender, race, and class in mainstream textbooks. American Sociological Review, 61, 929–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Fine, C. (2011). Delusions of gender: The real science behind sex differences. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  62. Fine, C. (2017). Testosterone rex: Myths of sex, science and society. New York: W. W. Norton Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Fiske, S. R., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2018). Framing gender. In B. J. Risman, C. Froyum, & J. William (Eds.), The springer handbook of the sociology of gender. Scarborough. Springer Press.Google Scholar
  64. Fiske, S. R. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357–411). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  65. Fiske, S. R. (2001). Effects of power on bias: Power explains and maintains individual, group, and societal disparities. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power (pp. 181–193). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  66. Fiske, S. R., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What’s so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society. Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 173–196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Foucault, M. (1978). From the history of sexuality, volume I: An introduction. Harmondsworth, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  68. Frank, R. T. (1929). The female sex hormone. Baltimore, MD: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  69. Freese, J., Li, J. C. A., & Wade, L. D. (2003). The potential relevances of biology to social inquiry. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gansen, H., & Karin, M. (2018). Becoming gendered. In B. J. Risman, C. Froyum, & J. William (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of gender, second edition. Scarborough. Springer Press.Google Scholar
  71. Gherardi, S. (1995). Gender, symbolism and organizational cultures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2007). Gendertelling in organizations: Narratives from male-dominated environments. Copenhangen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  73. Gerson, K. (1985). Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  74. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  75. Halpern, C. T. (2012). Affirmation of a development systems approach to genetics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Harris, A. (1990). Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Review, 42, 581–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hays, S. (1994). Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Sociological Theory, 12, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Hays, S. (1998). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Heilman, M., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Hoffman, R. M., & DiAnne Borders, L. (2001). Twenty-five years after the bem sex role inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 39–55.Google Scholar
  81. Holterhus, P. M., Bebermeier, J. H., Werner, R., Demeter, J., Richter-Unruh, A., Cario, G., et al. (2009). Disorders of sex development expose transcriptional autonomy of genetic sex and androgen-programmed hormonal sex in human blood leukocytes. BMC Genomics, 10, 292–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Hollander, J. (2018). Interactional accountability. In B. J. Risman, C. Froyum, & J. William (Eds.), The springer handbook of the sociology of gender. Scarborough. Springer Press.Google Scholar
  83. Hrabovszky, Z., & Hutson, J. M. (2002). Androgen imprinting of the brain in animal models and humans with intersex disorders: Review and recommendations. The Journal of Urology, 168, 2142–2148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ingraham, C. (1994). The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. Sociological Theory, 12, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Jones, N. (2009). Between good and ghetto: African American girls and inner-city violence. Newark, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Jordan-Young, R. M. (2010). Brainstorm: The flaws in the science of sex differences Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Kan, Y. M., Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2011). Gender convergence in domestic work: Discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology, 45, 234–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kane, E. W. (2006). ‘No way my boys are going to be like that!’: Parents’ responses to children’s gender nonconformity. Gender & Society, 20, 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Kane, E. W. (2012). The gender trap: Parents and the pitfalls of raising boys and girls. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  91. Karoly, D., Freud, J., & De Jongh, S. E. (1934). Conditions of hypertrophy of seminal vesicles in rats: The effect of derivatives of oestrone (menoformon). Biochemical Journal, 28, 1360–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  93. King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs, 14, 42–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children’s sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The Development of Sex Differences (pp. 82–173). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Laqueur, E., Dingemanse, E., Hart, P. C., & Jongh, S. E. (1927). Female sex hormone in urine of men. Klinische Wochenschrift, 6, 859.Google Scholar
  96. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  97. Lever, J. (1974). Games children play: Sex differences and the development of role skills. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Levitt, H. M., Gerrish, E. A., & Hiestand, K. R. (2003). The misunderstood gender: A model of modern femme identity. Sex Roles, 48, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Lillie, F. R. (1939). Biological introduction. In E. Allen (Ed.), Sex and internal secretions (2nd ed.). Baltimore, M.D: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  100. Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature and nurture. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  101. Locksley, A., & Colten, M. E. (1979). Psychological androgyny: A Case of Mistaken Identity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1017–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Lopata, H. Z., & Thorne, B. (1978). On the term ‘sex roles’. Signs, 3, 718–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press Feminist Series.Google Scholar
  105. Martin, K. A. (1998). Becoming a gendered body: Practices of preschools. American Sociological Review, 63, 494–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Martin, P. Y. (2004). Gender as an institution. Social Forces, 82, 1249–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Mayhew, B. (1980). Structuralism versus individualist, part I: Shadowboxing in the dark. Social Forces, 59, 335–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Mohanty, C. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Muller, M. N., Marlowe, F. W., Bugumba, R., & Ellison, P. T. (2008). Testosterone and paternal care in each African foragers and pastoralists. Proceedings of Biological Science, 276(1655), 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Nakano Glenn, E. (1999). The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: An integrative framework. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lober, & B. Hess (Eds.), The gender lens: Revisioning gender (pp. 3–43). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  111. O’Connor, J. S., Orloff, A. S., & Shaver, S. (1999). States, markets, families: Gender, liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Oudshoorn, N. (1994). Beyond the natural body: An archeology of sex hormones. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Parkes, A. S. (1938). Terminology of sex hormones. Nature, 141, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  115. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  116. Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). Bem sex role inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Perrin, A. J., & Lee, H. (2007). The undertheorized environment: Sociological theory and the ontology of behavioral genetics. Sociological Perspectives, 50, 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Pfannkuche, K., Bouma, A., & Groothuis, T. (2009). Does testosterone affect lateralization of brain and behavior. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364, 929–942.Google Scholar
  119. Pfau-Effinger, B. (1998). Gender cultures and the gender arrangement—A theoretical framework for cross-national gender research. Innovations: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 11, 147–166.Google Scholar
  120. Phoenix, C. H., Goy, R. W., Gerall, A. A., & Young, W. C. (1959). Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues medicating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology, 65, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Randles, J. (2018). Gender, families, and social policy. In B. J. Risman, C. Froyum, & J. William (Eds.), The springer handbook of the sociology of gender. Scarborough: Springer Press.Google Scholar
  122. Ridgeway, C. L. (1991/2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. (2000). Limiting inequality through interaction: The end(s) of gender. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Consensus and the creation of status beliefs. Social Forces, 85, 431–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Ridgeway, C. L., & Kricheli-Katz, T. (2013). Intersecting cultural beliefs in social relations: Gender, race, and class binds and freedoms. Gender & Society, 27, 294–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Risman, B. J. (1987). Intimate relationships from a microstructural perspective: Men who mother. Gender and Society, 1, 6–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Risman, B. J. (1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  129. Risman, B. J., Atkinson, M. P., & Blackwelder, S. P. (1999). Understanding the juggling act: Gendered preferences and social structural constraints. Sociological Forum, 14(2), 313–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18, 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Risman, B. J. (2009). From doing to undoing: Gender as we know it. Gender & Society, 23, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Risman, B. J., & Davis, Georgiann. (2013). From sex roles to gender structure. Current Sociology Review, 61, 733–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Risman, B. J. (2017). Gender as a social structure: Are the millennials cracking the foundation? Social Currents.Google Scholar
  134. Risman, B. J. (2018). Where the millennials will take us: A new generation wrestles with the gender structure. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Rojek, C., & Turner, B. (2000). Decorative sociology: Towards a critique of the cultural turn. The Sociological Review, 48, 629–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Rosenblitt, J. C., Hosanna, S., Johnson, S. E., & Quadagno, D. M. (2001). Sensation seeking and hormones in men and women: Exploring the link. Hormones and Behavior, 40, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the political economy sex. In R. Reiter (Eds.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157–210). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  138. Schilt, K. (2011). Just one of the guys? Transgender men and the persistence of gender inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  139. Schilt, K., & Westbrook, L. (2009). Doing gender, doing heteronormativity ‘gender normals’, transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender & Society, 23, 440–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society., 36, 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Schwalbe, M., Godwin, S., Holden, D., Schrock, D., Thompson, S., & Wolkomir, M. (2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces, 79, 419–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Seidman, S. (Ed.). (1996). Queer theory/sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  143. Siebke, H. (1931). Presence of androkinin in female organism. Archiv für Gynaekologie, 146, 417–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Slaughter, M.-A. (2015). Unfinished business: Women, men, work, family. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  145. Sin, R. (2017). The emergence and persistence of gender ambivalence: A latent class analysis from 1977 to 2014. PhD Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
  146. Smelser, N. J. (Ed.). (1988). Social structure. In Handbook of sociology (pp. 103–129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  147. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1975). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Stockard, J., & Johnson, M. M. (1980). Sex roles: Sex inequality and sex role development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  149. Sullivan, O. (2006). Changing gender relations, changing families: Tracing the pace of change over time. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  150. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Swidler, A. (2001). Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  152. Udry, R. J. (2000). Biological limits of gender construction. American Sociological Review, 65, 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Wade, L. (2013). The new science of sex difference. Sociology Compass, 7(4), 278–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Warner, M. (1993). Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  155. Weitzman, L. J. (1979). Sex role socialization: A focus on women. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  156. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2014). Doing gender, determining gender transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society, 28, 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Williams, C. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the ‘female’ professions. Social Problems, 39, 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Williams, J. C. (2001). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  160. Wingfield, A. H. (2009). Racializing the glass escalator. Gender & Society, 23, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Wynn, A. T., & Shelley, J. C. (2018). Combating gender bias in modern workplaces. In B. J. Risman, C. Froyum, & J. William (Eds.), The springer handbook of the sociology of gender. Scarborough: Springer Press.Google Scholar
  162. Young, W. C., Goy, R. W., & Phoenix, C. H. (1965). Hormones and sexual behavior. In J. Money (Ed.), Sex research: New developments. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  163. Zelditch, M. (1955). Role differentiation in the nuclear family: A comparative study. In T. Parsons & R. Bales (Eds.), Family, socialization, and interaction process (pp. 307–352). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  164. Zimmer, L. (1988). Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. Social Problems, 35, 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Zondek, B. (1934). Oestrogenic hormone in the urine of the stallion. Nature, 133, 494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations