Abstract
Cambodia has experienced a number of major political changes since the colonial period. Accompanying these have been reforms in policies and practices in education. In particular, there have been many changes in the areas of educational administration, curriculum, and teaching and learning at the primary school level in the country.
At the same time, very little research has been conducted on school leadership and management at the primary school level in Cambodia, and specifically in relation to the post-conflict period. In particular, hardly any research has been undertaken to examine the issues that primary school leaders confront and the strategies that they use to deal with them. This is in line with international trends indicating that there are relatively few studies that have focused on extraordinarily challenging circumstances and, in particular, at the individual school level in post-conflict settings (Clarke and O’Donoghue, The case for studying educational leadership at the individual school level in post-conflict societies. In: Clarke S, O’Donoghue T (eds) School level leadership in post-conflict societies: the importance of context. Routledge, London/New York, pp 1–8, 2013). As a result, there is a very poor knowledge base to draw upon to promote the generation of an understanding of the context and the nature of school leadership in post-conflict contexts.
The study reported in this book was undertaken to address the deficits mentioned above. This final chapter opens with an overview of the study reported in this book. It goes on to present a summary of the results relating to each of the three central research questions. The matter of the transferability of the study’s results to contexts other than Cambodia is then considered. Finally, attention is given to the implications of the study for policy development and practice, and for future research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bitsch, V. (2005). Qualitative research: A grounded theory example and evaluation criteria. Journal of Agribusiness, 23(1), 75–91.
Burns, R. B. (1994). Introduction to research methods. Melbourne, Australia: Longman.
Bush, T. (2008). Leadership and management in education. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi, India/Singapore: Sage.
Bush, T. (2014). Educational leadership and leadership development in Africa: Building the knowledge base. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(6), 787–791.
Bush, T., Glover, D., & Harris, A. (2007). Review of school leadership development. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
Clarke, S., & O’Donoghue, T. (2013). The case for studying educational leadership at the individual school level in post-conflict societies. In S. Clarke & T. O’Donoghue (Eds.), School level leadership in post-conflict societies: The importance of context (pp. 1–8). London/New York: Routledge.
Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2000a). Globalisation and societal culture: Redefining schooling and school leadership in the twenty-first century. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 30(3), 303–312.
Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2000b). Developing comparative and international educational leadership and management: A cross-cultural model. School Leadership & Management, 20(2), 143–160.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.
Goldring, E. B., Preston, C., & Huff, J. (2012). Conceptualising and evaluating professional development for school leaders. Planning and Changing, 43(3/4), 223–242.
Harris, A. (2002). Effective leadership in schools facing challenging contexts. School Leadership & Management, 22(1), 15–26.
Jensen, D. (2008). Transferability. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopaedia of qualitative research methods (p. 887). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2001). Education strategic plan 2001–2005. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2003). Education for all national plan 2003–2015. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2004). Policy for curriculum development 2005–2009. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2005a). Education strategic plan 2006–2010. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2005b). Education sector support programme 2006–2010. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2007). Child friendly school policy. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2010). Education strategic plan 2009–2013. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2013). Teacher policy. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2014a). Education strategic plan 2014–2018. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2014b). Education for all 2015 national review report: Cambodia. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2015). National education congress report on education, youth and sport performance in the academic year 2013/2014 and goals for the academic year 2014/2015. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: MoEYS.
Nawab, A. (2011). Exploring leadership practices in rural context of a developing country. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), 181–189.
O’Donoghue, T. (2007). Planning your qualitative research project: An introduction to Interpretivist research in education. London: Taylor & Francis.
Oplatka, I. (2004). The principalship in developing countries: Context, characteristics and reality. Comparative Education, 40(3), 427–448.
Rosli, A., & Rossi, F. (2014). Explaining the gap between policy aspirations and implementation: The case of university knowledge transfer policy in the United Kingdom. Birkbeck University of London, Centre for Innovation Management Research, London.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75.
UNESCO. (2015). Cambodia national launch of EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015: Cambodia EFA achievements. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: UNESCO.
Weinstein, H. M., Freedman, S. W., & Hughson, H. (2007). School voices: Challenges facing education systems after identity-based conflicts. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 2(1), 41–71.
Winter, R. (1982). “Dilemma analysis”: A contribution to methodology for action research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 12(3), 161–174.
Yin, R. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kheang, T., O’Donoghue, T., Clarke, S. (2018). Conclusion. In: Primary School Leadership in Cambodia. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76324-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76324-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76323-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76324-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)