Do Problems in Project Teams Explain the Influence of Family Involvement on Project Management Activities? A Family-Firm Perspective

Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 9)

Abstract

In the extant literature, there have been calls for researchers to deeply study the reasons why many projects still fail regardless of employment of reliable project management tools and techniques. Despite the numerous studies dedicated to the role of a project team in the overall success of a project, a relatively small number of papers have been dedicated to exploring the study area of the relationship between project teams and family involvement. The primary objective of this paper is to investigate whether the problems in project teams explain the influence of family involvement on project management activities, as based on the researched enterprises. Using binary logistic regression, Polish family businesses were surveyed. The results of the study indicate that the problems within the work of project teams are a significant factor in modelling the chance that companies will manage projects. This relationship might be additionally intensified by family involvement.

Keywords

Project management Problems in project teams Family businesses Family involvement 

References

  1. Andersen, E. S. (2015). Do project managers have different perspectives on project management? International Journal of Project Management, 34(1), 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage, A., & Keeble-Allen, D. (2008). Undertaking a structured literature review or structuring a literature review: Tales from the field. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(2), 103–114.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, R. B. (2005). Understanding internally generated risks in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(8), 584–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barringer, B. R., & Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 421–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2005). SMEs, growth, and poverty: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjursell, C. (2011). Cultural divergence in merging family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(2), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Block, J., Miller, D., Jaskiewicz, P., & Spiegel, F. (2013). Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: An analysis of patent data. Family Business Review, 26(2), 180–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional Wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1153–1173.Google Scholar
  10. Dyer, W. G. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Dyer, W. G., Jr. (2006). Examining the “Family Effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fabińska, M. (2016). Destimulants of the convergence process illustrated with the example of the level of participation of Polish SMEs in the seventh framework program and preparedness to participate in the horizons 2020 programs. In M. Bilgin & H. Danis (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics: Vol. 1. Proceedings of the 15th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (pp. 23–32). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faccio, M., Lang, L. H. P., & Young, L. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91(1), 54–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fung, H. P. (2014). Relationships among team trust, team cohesion, team satisfaction, team effectiveness and project performance as perceived by project managers in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(8), 205–216. Retrieved from http://ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2014/Special 3/205-216-special14.pdf
  15. Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.Google Scholar
  16. Hauswald, H., & Hack, A. (2013). Impact of family control/influence on stakeholders’ perceptions of benevolence. Family Business Review, 26(4), 356–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (pp. 3–4). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. International Project Management Association. (2006). ICB—IPMA competence baseline, version 3.0. Nijkerk: Internacional Project Management Association.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olson, P. D., Zuiker, V. S., Danes, S. M., Stafford, K., Heck, R. K. Z., & Duncan, K. A. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 639–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pérez-González, F. (2006). Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1559–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. PMI. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK ® guide) (5th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Ratalewska, M. (2016). The development of creative industries in Poland comparison with the European Union. In M. Bilgin & H. Danis (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics: Vol. 1. Proceedings of the 15th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (pp. 57–67). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reed, A. H., & Knight, L. V. (2010). Effect of a virtual project team environment on communication-related project risk. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 422–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sadkowska, J. (2016). The difficulty in following project schedule as a key project management challenge: Family firm perspective. Management and Economics Review, 1(2), 136–147.Google Scholar
  30. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scott-Young, C., & Samson, D. (2008). Project success and project team management: Evidence from capital projects in the process industries. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 749–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shenhar, A., & Dvir, D. (2008). Project management research—the challenge and opportunity. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36(2), 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., Brigham, K. H., Lumpkin, G. T., & Broberg, J. C. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: A comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Family Business Review, 22(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sorenson, R. L. (2000). The contribution of leadership style and practices to family and business success. Family Business Review, 13(3), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Susser, B. S. (2012). How to effectively manage IT project risks. Journal of Management and Business Research, 2(2), 41–67. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.library.capella.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=79968226&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  36. Vrhovec, S. L. R., Hovelja, T., Vavpotič, D., & Krisper, M. (2015). Diagnosing organizational risks in software projects: Stakeholder resistance. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1262–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wallace, L. (1999). The development of an instrument to measure software project risk. Atlanta: Georgia State University College of Business Administration.Google Scholar
  38. Wallace, L., & Neil, K. (2004). Software project risks and their effects on outcomes. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Więcek-Janka, E., Mierzwiak, R., & Kijewska, J. (2016). Competencies’ model in the succession process of family firms with the use of grey clustering analysis. The Journal of Grey System, 28(2), 121–131.Google Scholar
  41. Wiegers, K. (1998). Know your enemy: Software risk management. Software Risk Management, 6(10), 38–42.Google Scholar
  42. Yim, R., Castaneda, J., Doolen, T., Tumer, I., & Malak, R. (2014). A study of the impact of project classification on project risk indicators. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 863–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., Neubaum, D. O., Dibrell, C., & Craig, J. (2008). Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(6), 1035–1054.Google Scholar
  45. Zellweger, T. M., & Nason, R. S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review, 21(3), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Economics Department, Faculty of ManagementUniversity of GdanskSopotPoland

Personalised recommendations