Advertisement

The Received Curriculum: Nature as Understood by Students

  • Ajay Sharma
  • Cory Buxton
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore the received curriculum as reflected in students’ understanding of the natural world and its relationship with the human world. We braid existing research findings on students’ understanding of the major ecological topics covered in science curricula with patterns that emerged from our conversations with seventh-grade students in the classroom of the teacher covered in the previous chapter to present a comprehensive and detailed view of the received curriculum as regards nature in school science in the United States. On the whole, we see a huge transmission loss between the intended, enacted, and the received curricula. This transmission loss is largely limited to the understanding of science concepts. The overall perspectives on the world as embedded in the scientific and environmental discourses of the science standards, on the other hand, manage to seep into the received curriculum with remarkable fidelity.

References

  1. Aguirre-Bielschowsky, I., Freeman, C., & Vass, E. (2012). Influences on children’s environmental cognition: A comparative analysis of New Zealand and Mexico. Environmental Education Research, 18(1), 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M. (2014). Misconceptions in primary science. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  3. Barma, S., Lacasse, M., & Massé-Morneau, J. (2015). Engaging discussion about climate change in a Quebec secondary school: A challenge for science teachers. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besel, R. D., Burke, K., & Christos, V. (2017). A life history approach to perceptions of global climate change risk: Young adults’ experiences about impacts, causes, and solutions. Journal of Risk Research, 20(1), 61–75.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1017830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonnett, M. (2004). Lost in space? Education and the concept of nature. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 23(2/3), 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyes, E., Skamp, K., & Stanisstreet, M. (2009). Australian secondary students’ views about global warming: Beliefs about actions, and willingness to act. Research in Science Education, 39(5), 661–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bozzolasco, A. M. (2017). Using a mixed-methods approach to understand urban children’s nature conceptions, ecological worldviews, and environmental perceptions and preferences before and after attending an environmental education program. Montclair State University.Google Scholar
  8. Buxton, C. (2006). Creating contextually authentic science education in a “low performing” urban elementary school context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 695–721.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buxton, C. (2010). Social problem solving through science: An approach to critical place-based science teaching and learning. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43(1), 120–135.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903408932 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng, J. C. H., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cobern, W. W. (2000). Everyday thoughts about nature: A worldview investigation of important concepts students use to make sense of nature with specific attention to science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Covitt, B. A., Tan, E., Tsurusaki, B. K., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Students’ use of scientific knowledge and practices when making decisions in citizens’ roles. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Garden Grove. http://edr1.educ.msu.edu/EnvironmentalLit/publicsite/html/report_2009.html
  13. Cutler, M., Leiserowitz, A., & Rosenthal, S. (2017). Is nature stable, delicate, or random? Retrieved from http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/nature-stable-delicate-random/
  14. Dai, A. H.-I. (2011). A study of Taiwanese children’s conceptions of and relation to nature: Curricular and policy implications. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  15. Dauvergne, P. (2016). Environmentalism of the rich. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2013). Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1754).Google Scholar
  18. Eilam, B. (2012). System thinking and feeding relations: Learning with a live ecosystem model. Instructional Science, 40(2), 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elliot, G. (2016). Exploring nature as representation and young adults’ conceptualisations of nature in the user-generated online world: Nature 2.0. University of Otago.Google Scholar
  20. Ergazaki, M., & Ampatzidis, G. (2012). Students’ reasoning about the future of disturbed or protected ecosystems and the idea of the “balance of nature”. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grønhøj, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2017). Why young people do things for the environment: The role of parenting for adolescents’ motivation to engage in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoalst-Pullen, N., Lloyd, M. R., & Parkhurst, M. E. (2013). Environmental attitudes and perceptions: A comparison of Peru and the United States. Journal of Global Initiatives: Policy, Pedagogy, Perspective, 7(2), 12.Google Scholar
  23. Jordan, R., Gray, S., Demeter, M., Lui, L., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). An assessment of students’ understanding of ecosystem concepts: Conflating ecological systems and cycles. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 8(1), 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117–151). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Leiserowitz, A. (2007). Human development report 2007/2008: International public opinion, perception, and understanding of global climate change. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2007-2008/papers/leiserowitz_anthony6.pdf
  26. Li, J., & Ernst, J. (2015). Exploring value orientations toward the human–nature relationship: A comparison of urban youth in Minnesota, USA and Guangdong, China. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 556–585.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.910499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liarakou, G., Athanasiadis, I., & Gavrilakis, C. (2011). What Greek secondary school students believe about climate change? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(1), 79–98.Google Scholar
  28. Liu, S., & Lin, H. (2014). Undergraduate students’ science-related ideas as embedded in their environmental worldviews. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1001–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, 17(3/4), 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77(1), 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loughland, T., Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2002). Young people’s conceptions of environment: A phenomenographic analysis. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McBeth, W., & Volk, T. L. (2009). The national environmental literacy project: A baseline study of middle grade students in the United States. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielsen, J. A. (2012). Arguing from nature: The role of ‘nature’ in students’ argumentations on a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Özdem, Y., Dal, B., Öztürk, N., Sönmez, D., & Alper, U. (2014). What is that thing called climate change? An investigation into the understanding of climate change by seventh-grade students. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(4), 294–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Payne, P., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Gough, A., Gough, N., & Whitehouse, H. (2014). Children’s conceptions of nature. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 30(1), 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pointon, P. (2014). ‘The city snuffs out nature’: Young people’s conceptions of and relationship with nature. Environmental Education Research, 20(6), 776–794.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.833595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2009). Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 15(5), 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M., & Harbor, J. (2007). Students’ mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Bondell, H. D., Moore, S. E., & Carrier, S. J. (2014). Overcoming skepticism with education: Interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents. Climatic Change, 126(3–4), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Straumann, L. (2014). Money logging: On the trail of the Asian timber mafia. Basel: Bergli Books. Schwabe AG.Google Scholar
  42. Strife, S. J. (2012). Children’s environmental concerns: Expressing ecophobia. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(1), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsurusaki, B. K., & Anderson, C. W. (2010). Students’ understanding of connections between human engineered and natural environmental systems. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(4), 407–433.Google Scholar
  44. Vandermeer, J. H., & Perfecto, I. (2005). Breakfast of biodiversity: The political ecology of rain forest destruction. Oakland, CA/New York, NY: Food First Books.Google Scholar
  45. Vining, J., Merrick, M. S., & Price, E. A. (2008). The distinction between humans and nature: Human perceptions of connectedness to nature and elements of the natural and unnatural. Human Ecology Review, 15(1), 1.Google Scholar
  46. Zimmerman, C., & Cuddington, K. (2007). Ambiguous, circular and polysemous: Students’ definitions of the “balance of nature” metaphor. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 393–406.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505063022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ajay Sharma
    • 1
  • Cory Buxton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational Theory and PracticeUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.University of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations