Skip to main content

Professional Standardization and Teacher Agency? What Space for Leadership Development?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Professional Identities in Initial Teacher Education
  • 904 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 8 Professional Standardization and Teacher Agency? What Space for Leadership Development? examines how The Professional Standards for Provisional Registration as set out by the General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS) are translated, and eventually enacted at practitioner level within a neoliberal context of professionalism and standardization both globally and more specifically within the Scottish context. Mifsud initially presents the introduction of professional standards in ITE as a policy priority. A literature review focuses on two main areas, namely professionalism and professional standards in teaching and ITE, in addition to the notion of teacher agency. This is followed by an overview of professionalism and standardization within the Scottish context, in addition to a policy analysis of the Scottish standards and the students’ data interpreted through Foucauldian theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Various terms are used to refer to this Foucauldian notion: subjectification, subjectivation, subjectivity. I utilize the term ‘subjectification’ as utilized by Foucault in 2002b.

References

  • Adoniou, M., & Gallagher, M. (2017). Professional standards for teachers – What are they good for? Oxford Review of Education, 43(1), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, M. (1997). What matters most for teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balan, S. (2010). Michel Foucault’s view on power relations. Cogito. Multidisciplinary Research. Journal, 2(2), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 624–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N. (2015). Theorizing teacher agency and reform: How institutionalized instructional practices change and persist. Sociology of Education, 88(2), 140–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britzman, D. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (2015). Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 700–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, N., Brundrett, M., & Jones, M. (2008). Doing your education research project. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, F. (1997). The William Walker oration, 1996. Unsung heroes: The leaders in our classrooms. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Reshaping teaching policy, preparation and practice. Influences of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datnow, A. (2012). Teacher agency in educational reform: Lessons from social networks research. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2012). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, G. (2011). Teaching Scotland’s future: Report of a review of teacher education in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament and Council: Improving the quality of teacher education. COM (2007) 392.3, August 2007, European News. Final Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009). Communique of the conference of European ministers responsible for higher education. Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve, 28–29 April 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Rethinking education: Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomes. COM (2012) 669/3.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. Brussels: European Commission Education and Training EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, A., & Hamilton, T. (2013). The General Teaching Council for Scotland: An independent professional body. In T. G. K. Bryce, W. M. Humes, D. Gillies, & A. Kennedy (Eds.), Scottish education (4th ed., pp. 964–973). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T. (2007). Documents and documentary analysis: Reading between the lines. In A. R. J. Briggs & M. Coleman (Eds.), Research methods in educational leadership and management (2nd ed., pp. 278–294). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forde, C., McMahon, M. A., Hamilton, G., & Murray, R. (2016). Rethinking professional standards to promote professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 42(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1998). The history of sexuality vol. 1: The will to knowledge (trans. R. Hurley). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2002a). Governmentality. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Power. Vol 3 (pp. 201–222). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2002b). The subject and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Power. Vol 3 (pp. 326–348). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S., & Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher education in transition. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–52). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (2002). Introduction. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Power. Vol 3 (pp. xi–xli). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, I., Lewis, J., & Young, K. (1997). Perspectives on policy analysis. In M. Hill (Ed.), The policy process (pp. 5–9). London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • GTCS. (2012a). The standards for registration. Edinburgh: GTC Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • GTCS. (2012b). The student teacher code. Edinburgh: GTC Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • GTCS. (2012c). Code of professionalism and conduct. Edinburgh: GTC Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. M. (2005). Leading teachers. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of in-Service Education, 31(2), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A. (2015). What do professional learning policies say about purposes of teacher education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A., & Doherty, R. (2012). Professionalism and partnership: Panaceas for teacher education in Scotland? Journal of Education Policy, 27(6), 835–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, R., Janta, B., & Wegrich, K. (2008). Accountability of teachers: Literature review, prepared for the General Teaching Council England. (Technical Report). Rand Europe. Available online at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_report/RR180.html

  • Mayer, D., & Reid, J. A. (2016). Professionalising teacher education: Evolution of a changing knowledge and policy landscape. In J. Loughran & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education. Volume 1 (pp. 453–486). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D., Mitchell, J., Macdonald, D., & Bell, R. (2005). Professional standards for teachers: A case study of professional learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, J., Blake, A., Corbin, B., & Gray, P. (2008). Finding an identity and meeting a standard: Connecting the conflicting in teacher induction. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: Understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, K. (2007). Global governance, educational change. Comparative Education, 43(3), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brein, J. (2011). Continuing professional development for Scottish teachers: Tensions in policy and practice. Professional Development in Education, 37(5), 777–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M. (2003). Structuralism, post-structuralism, neo-liberalism: Assessing Foucault’s legacy. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). Education policy outlook 2015: Making reforms happen. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. (1995). De-skilling a profession: Professionalism, deprofessionalisation and the new managerialism. In H. Busher & R. Saran (Eds.), Managing teachers as professionals in schools (pp. 21–37). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, T. M. (2015). Common pressures, same results? Recent reforms in professional standards and competences in teacher education for secondary teachers in England, France and Germany. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(2), 180–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. & Robinson, S. (2012). Understanding teacher agency: The importance of relationships. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, 13–17 April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J., Philippou, S., & Robinson, S. (2015). The teacher and the curriculum: Exploring teacher agency. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (pp. 187–201). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault reader. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2003). Teacher professional standards: Controlling or developing teaching? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9(2), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(4), 413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (2000). Reading educational research and policy. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, K. (2006). Teacher identity and agency in school worlds: Beyond the all-good/all-bad discourse on accountability-explicit curriculum policies. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 119–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2001). Critical politics of teachers’ work. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronach, I. (2010). Globalizing education, educating the local: How method made us mad. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, D., & Forde, C. (2017). Redefining what it means to be a teacher through professional standards: Implications for continuing teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 110–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mifsud, D. (2018). Professional Standardization and Teacher Agency? What Space for Leadership Development?. In: Professional Identities in Initial Teacher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76174-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76174-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76173-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76174-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics