Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rankings of Students Based on Experts’ Assessment and Levels of the Likelihood of Learning Outcome Acquirement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications (ICTERI 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 826))

  • 342 Accesses

Abstract

The paper presents methods of preparing students’ rankings based on the results of final secondary school examination test in mathematics in Poland with the proposal of methods for calculating the levels of the likelihood of learning outcome acquirement. The currently used method is based on the percentage of earned points and does not take into account levels of acquirement of learning outcomes by students. The data used in this article contains results of students who earned the same number of points, so the structure of this uniform group with respect to learning outcomes will be presented. All chosen methods of preparing rankings are based on the experts’ assessment of levels of verification of learning outcomes by items and methods of this assessment fuzzification. According to the applied method, the rankings show some difference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Higher Educational Area. www.ehea.info. Accessed 12 July 2016

  2. Rozporządzenie Ministra Edukacji Narodowej z dnia 23 grudnia 2008 r. w sprawie podstawy programowej wychowania przedszkolnego oraz kształcenia ogólnego w poszczególnych typach szkół. http://isap.sejm.gov.pl. Accessed 12 July 2016

  3. Zasady oceniania rozwiązań zadań, Egzamin maturalny w roku 2014/2015, Centralna Komisja Egzaminacyjna. www.cke.edu.pl. Accessed 12 July 2016

  4. Ahmad, B., Kharal, A.: On fuzzy soft sets. Adv. Fuzzy Syst. 2009, 6 p. (2009). Article ID 586507. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/586507

  5. Baker, F.B.: The Basics of Item Response Theory. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biswas, R.: An application of fuzzy sets in students’ evaluation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 74, 187–194 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Csaba, J.Z.: Survey on four fuzzy set theory based student evaluation methods. In: Proceedings of Kecskemét College, Faculty of Technology (GAMF), Kecskemét, HU, vol. XXIII, pp. 121–130 (2008). ISSN: 1587-4400

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dayan, F., Zulqarnain, M., Hassan, N.: A ranking method for students of different socio economic backgrounds based on generalized fuzzy soft sets. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 6(9), 2015–2018 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dobrosielski, W.T., Szczepański, J., Zarzycki, H.: A proposal for a method of defuzzification based on the golden Ratio—GR. In: Atanassov, K.T., et al. (eds.) Novel Developments in Uncertainty Representation and Processing. AISC, vol. 401, pp. 75–84. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26211-6_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Duch, W., Wieczorek, T., Biesiada, J., Blachnik, M.: Comparison of feature ranking methods based on information entropy. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Budapest 2004, pp. 1415–1420. IEEE Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duch, W., Winiarski T., Biesiada J., Kachel, A.: Feature ranking, selection and discretization. In: Proceedings of Joint International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN) and International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP), Istanbul, pp. 251–254 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erdoğan, M., Kaya, İ.: A type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for ranking private universities in İstanbul. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, WCE 2014, London, U.K. 2–4 July, vol. 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H.: Item Response Theory, Principles and Applications. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1988-9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hameed, I.A., Sorensen, C.G.: Fuzzy systems in education: a more reliable system for student evaluation. In: Azar, A.T. (ed.) Fuzzy systems. InTech, London (2010). http://www.intechopen.com/books/fuzzy-systems/fuzzy-systems-in-education-a-more-reliable-system-for-student-evaluation

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huapaya, C.: Proposal of fuzzy logic-based students´ learning assessment model. In: XVIII Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ingoley, S., Bakal, J.W.: Use of fuzzy logic in evaluating students’ learning achievement. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Eng. Commun. Technol. (IJACECT), 1(2), 47–54 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Majumdar, P., Samanta, S.K.: A generalised fuzzy soft set based student ranking system. Int. J. Adv. Soft Comput. Appl. 3(3) November 2011. www.i-csrs.org

  18. Molodtsov, D.: Soft set theory first results. Comput. Math App. 37, 19–31 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mreła, A., Sokolov, O., Katafiasz, T.: Types of fuzzy relations’ composition applied to the validation of learning outcomes at mathematics during final high school examination. In: Mreła, A., Wilkoszewski, P. (eds.): Nauka i technika u progu III tysiąclecia, Wydawnictwo Kujawsko-Pomorskiej Szkoły Wyższej w Bydgoszczy, Bydgoszcz, pp. 119–132 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heймaн, Ю.M, Xлeбникoв, B.A.: Bвeдeниe в тeopию мoдeлиpoвaния и пapaмeтpизaции пeдaгoгичecкиx тecтoв. Пpoмeтeй, M. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rutkowski, R.: Metody i techniki sztucznej inteligencji. PWN, Warsaw (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Yadav, A.K., Reza, A., Srivastava, S.: A comparative study for ranking the efficiency of washing machines based on fuzzy set theory. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci., Eng. Technol. 3(4), 11678–11684 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning–1. Inf. Sci. 8, 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Zeng, W., Li, J.: Fuzzy logic and its application in football team ranking. Sci. World J. 2014, 1–6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/291650. Article ID 291650

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Technology, Kujawy and Pomorze University in Bydgoszcz, Toruńska Street 55-57, 85-023, Bydgoszcz, Poland

    Aleksandra Mreła

  2. Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Grudziądzka Street 5, 87-100, Toruń, Poland

    Oleksandr Sokolov

Authors
  1. Aleksandra Mreła
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oleksandr Sokolov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandra Mreła .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Nick Bassiliades

  2. Zaporizhzhia National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine

    Vadim Ermolayev

  3. University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

    Hans-Georg Fill

  4. Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

    Vitaliy Yakovyna

  5. University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Heinrich C. Mayr

  6. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

    Mykola Nikitchenko

  7. V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

    Grygoriy Zholtkevych

  8. Kherson State University, Kherson, Ukraine

    Aleksander Spivakovsky

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mreła, A., Sokolov, O. (2018). Rankings of Students Based on Experts’ Assessment and Levels of the Likelihood of Learning Outcome Acquirement. In: Bassiliades, N., et al. Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications. ICTERI 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 826. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76168-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76168-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76167-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76168-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation