Skip to main content

A Bisociative Approach to Design: Integrating Space Syntax into Architectural Education

Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Space syntax is a significant theory and tool that describes buildings and cities as evolutionary processes, offering valuable support to architectural and urban design. However, theory and analytical research are different from the processes that characterise the generation of ideas in design practice. This chapter elaborates first, on the differences and intersections of analytical knowledge and intentional design, and second, on some projects charged with integrating space syntax analysis into the studio. Considering design as a propositional field manipulating elements and relations through intuition and logical order, we argue that classification forms a crucial concept in design thinking, serving as a tool for design generation and invention. We propose a ‘bisociative’ approach as the intellectual synthesis of relations in two domains, the ‘form-of-a-class’ and the ‘syntax-of-a-class’. The former refers to conceptual relations of similarity and difference in design, while the latter describes network properties among elements of built space. Based on the membership of elements in the same or different domains, we identify two fundamental modes of design operation, the ‘convergent’ and ‘divergent’ modes. Bisociation can be used in the design studio to generate ideas while maintaining intellectual synthesis and rigour.

Keywords

  • Design
  • Space syntax
  • Morphology
  • Form
  • Space
  • Theory

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76126-8_13
  • Chapter length: 22 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-76126-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 13.1
Fig. 13.2
Fig. 13.3
Fig. 13.4
Fig. 13.5
Fig. 13.6
Fig. 13.7

References

  • Alberti LB (1988[1452]). De re aedificatoria. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander C (1971) The state of the art in design methods. DMG Newsletter 5:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander PA (2016) Relational thinking and relational reasoning. NPJ Sci Learn 1:16004

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Archer B (1981) A view of the nature of design research. Des Sci Method 1:30–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2005) Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models and fractals. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonsiepe G (2007) The uneasy relationship between design and design research. In: Michel R (ed) Design research now. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 25–39

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cataldi G (2003) From Muratori to Caniggia: the origins and development of the Italian school of design typology. Urban Morphol 7:19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan CS (1990) Cognitive processes in architectural design problem solving. Des Stud 11:60–80

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (1993) A history of design methodology. In: Vries MJ (ed) Design methodology and relationships with science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 15–27

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (1999) Design research: a disciplined conversation. Des Issues 15:5–10

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (2001) Achieving pleasure from purpose the methods of Kenneth Grange, product designer. Des J 4:48–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (2002) Creative cognition in design: processes of exceptional designers. In: Hewett T, Kavanagh T (eds) Creativity and cognition. ACM Press, New York, pp 14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (2007) From a design science to a design discipline. In: Michel R (ed) Design research now. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 41–54

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N, Cross AC (1996) Winning by design. Des Stud 17:91–107

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Emo B, Al-Sayed K, Varoudis T (2016) Design, cognition & behaviour: usability in the built environment. Int J Des Creativity Innovation 4:63–66

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman L (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40:35–41

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gelernter M (1995) Sources of architectural form. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn S (1985) Science and perception as design. Des Stud 6:122–126

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Grant D (1979) Design methodology and design methods. Des Meth Theor 13:46–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (2016) What are cities for? And how does this relate to their spatial form? J Space Syntax 6:199–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Hanson J, Peponis J (1984) What do we mean by building function. In: Powell JA, Cooper I, Lera S (eds) Designing for building utilisation. E & FN Spon, London, pp 61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B, Burdett R, Peponis J, Penn A (1987) Creating life: or, does architecture determine anything? Architecture et Comportement 3:233–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JC (1977) How my thoughts about design methods have changed during the years. Des Meth Theor 11:48–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler A (1964) The act of creation. The Macmillan Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koolhaas R (2014) Fundamentals catalogue. Marsilio, Venice

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K (2007) Design research, an oxymoron? In: Michel R (ed) Design research now. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 67–80

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson B (2004) What designers know. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • March L (1998) The architectonics of humanism: essays on number in architecture. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • March L, Steadman P (1974) The geometry of environment. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moudon AV (1992) A catholic approach to organizing what urban designers should know. CPL Bibliography 6:331–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Moundon AV (1994) Getting to know the built landscape: typomorphology. In: Franck KA, Schneekloth LH (eds) Ordering space: types in architecture and design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 289–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Moudon AV (1997) Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphol 1:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Palladio A (1965[1570]) The four books of architecture. Courier Corporation, Mineola

    Google Scholar 

  • Peponis J (2005) Spatial construction of meaning. J Archit 10:119–133

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis J, Bafna S, Dahabreh SM (2015) Configurational meaning and conceptual shifts in design. J Archit 20:215–243

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis J, Cheng F, Park J (2017) Diversity and scale in superblock design. Urban Des 5:30–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarra S (2009) Architecture and narrative. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarra S (2014) Beyond analytical knowledge. ITUA/Z 11:47–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarra S, Kostourou F, Krenz K (eds) (2015) E-merging design research: Rio@Rio. The Bartlett School of Architecture, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Psarra S, Kostourou F, Krenz K (eds) (2017) E-merging design research: pop-up city. The Bartlett School of Architecture, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HW, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe C (1984) The mathematics of the ideal villa and other essays. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell B (1996) The principles of mathematics. WW Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakelaridou R (2011) Searching for order. J Space Syntax 2:154–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B (2007) Design as practice, science and research. In: Michel R (ed) Design research now. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 207–218

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schön D (1981) The reflective practitioner: how practitioners think in action. Temple Smith, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner: how practitioners think in action. Temple Smith, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman P (2008) The evolution of designs. Routldege, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman P (2014) Building types and built forms. Matador, Leicestershire

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzonis A, Lefaivre L (1986) Classical architecture: the poetics of order. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittkower R (1974) Architectural principles in the age of humanism. Academy Editions, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophia Psarra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Psarra, S., Kostourou, F., Krenz, K. (2018). A Bisociative Approach to Design: Integrating Space Syntax into Architectural Education. In: Oliveira, V. (eds) Teaching Urban Morphology. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76126-8_13

Download citation