Abstract
Space syntax is a significant theory and tool that describes buildings and cities as evolutionary processes, offering valuable support to architectural and urban design. However, theory and analytical research are different from the processes that characterise the generation of ideas in design practice. This chapter elaborates first, on the differences and intersections of analytical knowledge and intentional design, and second, on some projects charged with integrating space syntax analysis into the studio. Considering design as a propositional field manipulating elements and relations through intuition and logical order, we argue that classification forms a crucial concept in design thinking, serving as a tool for design generation and invention. We propose a ‘bisociative’ approach as the intellectual synthesis of relations in two domains, the ‘form-of-a-class’ and the ‘syntax-of-a-class’. The former refers to conceptual relations of similarity and difference in design, while the latter describes network properties among elements of built space. Based on the membership of elements in the same or different domains, we identify two fundamental modes of design operation, the ‘convergent’ and ‘divergent’ modes. Bisociation can be used in the design studio to generate ideas while maintaining intellectual synthesis and rigour.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alberti LB (1988[1452]). De re aedificatoria. MIT Press, Cambridge
Alexander C (1971) The state of the art in design methods. DMG Newsletter 5:3–7
Alexander PA (2016) Relational thinking and relational reasoning. NPJ Sci Learn 1:16004
Archer B (1981) A view of the nature of design research. Des Sci Method 1:30–47
Batty M (2005) Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models and fractals. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Bonsiepe G (2007) The uneasy relationship between design and design research. In: Michel R (ed) Design research now. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 25–39
Cataldi G (2003) From Muratori to Caniggia: the origins and development of the Italian school of design typology. Urban Morphol 7:19–34
Chan CS (1990) Cognitive processes in architectural design problem solving. Des Stud 11:60–80
Cross N (1993) A history of design methodology. In: Vries MJ (ed) Design methodology and relationships with science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 15–27
Cross N (1999) Design research: a disciplined conversation. Des Issues 15:5–10
Cross N (2001) Achieving pleasure from purpose the methods of Kenneth Grange, product designer. Des J 4:48–58
Cross N (2002) Creative cognition in design: processes of exceptional designers. In: Hewett T, Kavanagh T (eds) Creativity and cognition. ACM Press, New York, pp 14–19
Cross N (2007) From a design science to a design discipline. In: Michel R (ed) Design research now. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 41–54
Cross N, Cross AC (1996) Winning by design. Des Stud 17:91–107
Emo B, Al-Sayed K, Varoudis T (2016) Design, cognition & behaviour: usability in the built environment. Int J Des Creativity Innovation 4:63–66
Freeman L (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40:35–41
Gelernter M (1995) Sources of architectural form. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Glynn S (1985) Science and perception as design. Des Stud 6:122–126
Grant D (1979) Design methodology and design methods. Des Meth Theor 13:46–47
Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hillier B (2016) What are cities for? And how does this relate to their spatial form? J Space Syntax 6:199–212
Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hillier B, Hanson J, Peponis J (1984) What do we mean by building function. In: Powell JA, Cooper I, Lera S (eds) Designing for building utilisation. E & FN Spon, London, pp 61–72
Hillier B, Burdett R, Peponis J, Penn A (1987) Creating life: or, does architecture determine anything? Architecture et Comportement 3:233–250
Jones JC (1977) How my thoughts about design methods have changed during the years. Des Meth Theor 11:48–62
Koestler A (1964) The act of creation. The Macmillan Company, New York
Koolhaas R (2014) Fundamentals catalogue. Marsilio, Venice
Krippendorff K (2007) Design research, an oxymoron? In: Michel R (ed) Design research now. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 67–80
Lawson B (2004) What designers know. Routledge, London
March L (1998) The architectonics of humanism: essays on number in architecture. Wiley, Chichester
March L, Steadman P (1974) The geometry of environment. Methuen, London
Moudon AV (1992) A catholic approach to organizing what urban designers should know. CPL Bibliography 6:331–349
Moundon AV (1994) Getting to know the built landscape: typomorphology. In: Franck KA, Schneekloth LH (eds) Ordering space: types in architecture and design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 289–311
Moudon AV (1997) Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphol 1:3–10
Palladio A (1965[1570]) The four books of architecture. Courier Corporation, Mineola
Peponis J (2005) Spatial construction of meaning. J Archit 10:119–133
Peponis J, Bafna S, Dahabreh SM (2015) Configurational meaning and conceptual shifts in design. J Archit 20:215–243
Peponis J, Cheng F, Park J (2017) Diversity and scale in superblock design. Urban Des 5:30–41
Psarra S (2009) Architecture and narrative. Routledge, London
Psarra S (2014) Beyond analytical knowledge. ITUA/Z 11:47–68
Psarra S, Kostourou F, Krenz K (eds) (2015) E-merging design research: Rio@Rio. The Bartlett School of Architecture, London
Psarra S, Kostourou F, Krenz K (eds) (2017) E-merging design research: pop-up city. The Bartlett School of Architecture, London
Rittel HW, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169
Rowe C (1984) The mathematics of the ideal villa and other essays. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Russell B (1996) The principles of mathematics. WW Norton & Company, New York
Sakelaridou R (2011) Searching for order. J Space Syntax 2:154–179
Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge
Schneider B (2007) Design as practice, science and research. In: Michel R (ed) Design research now. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 207–218
Schön D (1981) The reflective practitioner: how practitioners think in action. Temple Smith, London
Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner: how practitioners think in action. Temple Smith, London
Steadman P (2008) The evolution of designs. Routldege, London
Steadman P (2014) Building types and built forms. Matador, Leicestershire
Tzonis A, Lefaivre L (1986) Classical architecture: the poetics of order. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Wittkower R (1974) Architectural principles in the age of humanism. Academy Editions, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Psarra, S., Kostourou, F., Krenz, K. (2018). A Bisociative Approach to Design: Integrating Space Syntax into Architectural Education. In: Oliveira, V. (eds) Teaching Urban Morphology. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76126-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76126-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76125-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76126-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)