Challenges in Conducting a New Longitudinal Study on Children and Young People Well-Being in the European Union
Longitudinal studies have a number of challenges in terms of data collection and analysis including sample attrition, panel conditioning, coverage error, time and cost. In addition, variability exists among European nations as to the availability and coverage of sampling frames, laws and regulations that restrict aspects of survey practice, availability and capacity of survey research organisations, cultural and behavioural norms, language(s) spoken, geographical dispersal of the study populations. Furthermore, research involving children and young people requires ethical considerations including how the children and young people can and should be involved in a study with reference to the degree of control and participation that they have.
KeywordsLongitudinal survey Methodology Child and youth well-being
- Bauer, K. W. (2004). Conducting longitudinal studies. In S. R. Porter (Ed.), Overcoming survey research problem (pp. 75–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Blair, J., & Piccinino, L. (2005). The development and testing of instruments for cross-cultural and multi-cultural surveys. In J. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & J. Harkness (Eds.), Methodological aspects in cross-national research. http://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/forschung/publikationen/zeitschriften/zuma_nachrichten_spezial/znspezial11.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.Google Scholar
- Buck, N., Ermisch, J. F., & Jenkins, S. P. (1995). Choosing a longitudinal survey design: The issues. Essex: ESRC Research Centre on Micro-Social Change.Google Scholar
- Coliver, A., and the SPARCLE Group. (2006). Study protocol: SPARCLE – A multi-centre European study of the relationship of environment to participation and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. BMC Public Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-105.
- Dolan, P., et al. (2015). Youth as researcher training manual. Galway: UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre.Google Scholar
- European Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). The FRA register. http://fra.europa.eu/en/theme/rights-child/child-participation-in-research. Accessed 5 Nov 2017.Google Scholar
- Fisher, P. (2016). Does repeated measurement improve income data quality? (ISER Working Paper Series, 2016–11). Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
- Fitzgerald, R., Widdop, S., Gray, M., & Collins, D. (2009). Testing for equivalence using cross-national cognitive interviewing (Centre for Comparative Social Surveys Working Paper Series, Paper no. 01). https://www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/125132/CCSS-Working-Paper-No-01.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.
- Halman, L. (2001). The European values study: A third wave. Source book of the 1999/2000 European values study surveys. Tilburg: EVS, WORC, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
- Harkness, J. A. (2008). Comparative survey research: Goals and challenges. In E. D. De Leeux, J. J. Hox, & D. Dillman (Eds.), International handbook of survey methodology. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J. H. P., & Harkness, J. A. (Eds.). (2005). Methodological aspects in cross-national research. Mannheim: ZUMA.Google Scholar
- Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation from tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. Available on http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/childrens_participation.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2017.Google Scholar
- Jelicic, H., Gibb, J., La Valle, I., & Payne, L. (2013). Involved by right, the voice of the child in the child protection conferences. London: National Children Bureau.Google Scholar
- Lyford Jones, H. (2010). Putting children at the centre, a practical guide to child participation. London: International Save the Children Alliance.Google Scholar
- Lynn, P. (2004). The use of substitution in surveys. The Survey Statistician, 49, 14–16.Google Scholar
- Lynn, P. (2008). The problem of non-response. In E. D. de Leeuw, J. J. Hox, & D. A. Dillman (Eds.), International handbook of survey research methods (pp. 35–55). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Lynn, P. (2012). Longitudinal survey methods for the household finances and consumption survey. Report prepared for the European Central Bank. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/pdf/research/hfcn/Lynn_LongitudinalSurveyMethodsfor_HFCS.pdf?5fd3b6872274bd59923ea90cc2ce0896. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.
- Lynn, P., Gabler, S., Häder, S., & Laaksonen, S. (2007). Methods for achieving equivalence of samples in cross-national surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 23(1), 107–124.Google Scholar
- Menard, S. (1991). Longitudinal research. London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
- Morrow, V., & Boyden, J. (2014). Ethics on researching children’s well-being. In A. Ben Ariech et al. (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2010). Translation and adaptation guidelines for PISA 2012. Budapest: OECD.Google Scholar
- O’Shea, R., Bryson, C., & Jowell, R. (n.d.). Comparative attitudinal research in Europe. London: European Social Survey Directorate, National Centre for Social Research. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/index.php?option=com_docmanandtask=doc_viewandgid=1andItemid=595. Accessed 26 Nov 2012.
- Park, A., & Jowell, R. (1996). Consistencies and differences in a cross-national survey. The international social survey programme. London: SCPR.Google Scholar
- Prout, A., & James, A. (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: UK Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Rees, G., Bradshaw, J., Goswami, H., & Keung, H. (2010). Understanding children’s well-being: A national survey of young people’s well-being. London: The Children’s Society.Google Scholar
- Rees, G., Goswami, H., Pople, L., Bradshaw, J., Keung, A., & Main, G. (2012). The good childhood report 2012: A review of our children’s well-being. London: The Children’s Society.Google Scholar
- Ruspini, E. (2002). Introduction to longitudinal research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N. (2003). Culture sensitive context effects: A challenge for cross-sectional surveys. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. van de Vijver, & P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Shaw, C., Brady, L., & Davey, C. (2011). Guidelines for research with children and young people. London: National Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. W. (2003). Developing comparable questions in cross-national surveys. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. van de Vijver, & P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Stafford, A., & Smith, C. (2009). Practical guidance on consulting, conducting research and working in participative ways with children and young people experiencing domestic abuse. Edinburgh: Education Analytical Services, The Scottish Government. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/284756/0086482.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2012.Google Scholar
- Stoop, I., Jowell, R., & Mohler, P. (2002). The European social survey: One survey in two dozen countries. Paper presented at the international conference on improving surveys, Copenhagen, 25–28 August.Google Scholar
- Tanzer, N. K. (2005). Developing tests for use in multiple languages and cultures: A plea for simultaneous development. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- UNCRC. (1989, November 20). UN general assembly, convention on the rights of the child (United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 1577). https://downloads.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/UNCRC_united_nations_convention_on_the_rights_of_the_child.pdf?_ga=2.37879971.1401274608.1513353419-54837490.1489657220. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.