Abstract
This article explores the relationship between legitimacy and success in the high education sector. To do so the relationship between legitimacy and organizational results is analysed as well as the relationship between legitimacy and the access to resources. Eight hypotheses related to the legitimacy of the European Higher Education Area in the public universities of Madrid (Spain) are proposed. Hypotheses are tested by using data from students (783 questionnaires), teachers (761 questionnaires) and other publicly available secondary data. Results suggest differences according to the source and the type of legitimacy analysed. There is no appreciable relation between teacher’s legitimacy and their results. However, universities with high teacher’s legitimacy show better access to resources. Regarding student’s legitimacy, we found that universities with high legitimacy obtain a little more better result. Furthermore, high student’s legitimacy leads to better access to resources. This research provides answers to some gaps of the legitimacy literature. Do greatest legitimacy organizations obtain better results? Do they get better access to resources? What type of legitimacy lead to better organizational results?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2001). Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 72–83.
Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Yeh, K. S. (2008). Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43, 385–399.
Alcantara, L., Mitsuhashi, H., & Hoshino, Y. (2006). Legitimacy in international joint ventures: It is still needed. Journal of International Management, 12, 389–407.
Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in – the institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–670.
Arnold, S. J., Handelman, J., & Tigert, D. J. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and retail store patronage. Journal of Business Research, 35, 229–239.
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical-examination of the relationship between corporate social-responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463.
Balabanis, G., Phillips, H. C., & Lyall, J. (1998). Corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top British companies: Are they linked? European Business Review, 98, 25–44.
Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 93–103.
Barreto, I., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2006). To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1559–1581.
Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 187–218.
Bianchi, & Ostale. (2006). Lessons learned from unsuccessful internationalization attempts: Examples of multinational retailers in Chile. Journal of Business Research, 59(2006), 140–147.
Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.
Blair, E., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Nonresponse and generalizability in academic research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 4–7.
Blanco-González, A., Cruz-Suárez, A., & Díez-Martín, F. (2015). The EFQM model as an instrument to legitimise organisations. In M. Peris-Ortiz, J. Álvarez-García, & C. Rueda-Armengot (Eds.), Achieving competitive advantage through quality management (pp. 155–169). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Blanco-González, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2017). Building a European legitimacy index. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(5), 509–525.
Bozeman, B. (1993). Understanding the roots of publicness. In B. Sutton (Ed.), The legitimate corporation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Brown, A. D. (1998). Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 35–58.
Chen, H. Y., Griffith, D. A., & Hu, M. Y. (2006). The influence of liability of foreignness on market entry strategies. International Marketing Review, 23, 636–649.
Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, A., & Prado-Román, M. (2014). Cognitive legitimacy, resource access, and organizational outcomes. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54(5), 575–584.
Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1024–1039.
Deephouse, D., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage.
Déniz Déniz, M., & García Cabrera, A. (2011). El isomorfismo mimético y las ventajas de localización como determinantes de la elección del modo de entrada. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20, 105–122.
Díez-de-Castro, E., Díez-Martín, F., & Vázquez-Sánchez, A. (2015). Antecedentes de la institucionalización de las organizaciones. Cuadernos de Gestión, 15(1), 15–38.
Diez-Martin, F., Blanco-Gonzalez, A., & Prado-Roman, C. (2010a). Legitimidad como factor clave del éxito organizativo. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16(3), 127–143.
Diez-Martin, F., Blanco-Gonzalez, A., & Prado-Roman, C. (2010b). Measuring organizational legitimacy: The case of Mutual Guarantee Societies. Cuadernos de Economia y Direccion de la Empresa, 43(junio), 115–143.
Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Roman, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013). Beyond legitimacy: Legitimacy types and organizational success. Management Decision, 51(10), 1954–1969.
Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2016). Explaining nation-wide differences in entrepreneurial activity: a legitimacy perspective. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,12(4), 1079–1102.
Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited – institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
Dornbush, S. M., & Scott, W. R. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions – a marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 699–738.
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58–80.
Hunt, C. S., & Aldrich, H. E. (1996). Why even Rodney Dangerfield has a home page: Legitimizing the world wide web as a medium for commercial endeavours, Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, Ohio: Academy of Management.
Kannan-Narasimhan, R. (2014). Organizational ingenuity in nascent innovations: Gaining resources and legitimacy through unconventional actions. Organization Studies, 35(4), 483–509.
Lamin, A., & Zaheer, S. (2012). Wall street vs. main street: Firm strategies for defending legitimacy and their impact on different stakeholders. Organization Science, 23(1), 47–66.
Li, J. T., Yang, J. Y., & Yue, D. R. (2007). Identity community, and audience: How wholly owned foreign subsidiaries gain legitimacy in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 175–190.
Low, B., & Johnston, W. (2008). Securing and managing an organizations network legitimacy: The case of Motorola China. Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 873–879.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations – formal-structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.
Ortega Castro, V., Pérez Esparrells, C., & Morales Sequera, S. (2008) La financiación de las Universidades Públicas de la Comunidad de Madrid y su aplicación a la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Madrid, Spain: Consejo Social, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Patriotta, G., Gond, J.-P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804–1836.
Pollack, J. M., Rutherford, M. W., & Nagy, B. G. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915–939.
Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 877–904.
Rutherford, M. W., & Buller, P. F. (2007). Searching for the legitimacy threshold. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 78–92.
Scott, W. R. (1977). Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In P. S. Goodman & J. M. Pennings (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Scott, W. R. (1994). Institutions and organizations: Toward a theoretical synthesis. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization o societal sectors. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
Thomas, T. E. (2005). Are business students buying it? A theoretical framework for measuring attitudes toward the legitimacy of environmental sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 186–197.
Tornikoski, E. T., & Newbert, S. L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 311–335.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
Überbacher, F. (2014). Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 667–698.
Vanhonacker, W. R. (2000). A better way to crack China. Harvard Business Review, 78, 20.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 341–363.
Zeitz, G., Mittal, V., & Mcaulay, B. (1999). Distinguishing adoption and entrenchment of management practices: A framework for analysis. Organization Studies, 20, 741–776.
Zelditch, M. (2001). Processes of legitimation: Recent developments and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 4–17.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414–431.
Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miranda, S., Cruz-Suarez, A., Prado-Román, M. (2018). Relationship Between Legitimacy and Organizational Success. In: Díez-De-Castro, E., Peris-Ortiz, M. (eds) Organizational Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75990-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75990-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75989-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75990-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)