Abstract
In this chapter, we consider a master system consisting of a nonlinear differential inclusion and an algebraic equation of constraint (resulting in a Differential Algebraic Inclusion (DAI) system). This system is coupled to a nonlinear energy sink (NES) corresponding to a one degree-of-freedom essentially nonlinear differential equation. We examine how a resonance capture can lead to a reduced order dynamical system. To obtain this reduced order model, we describe a multiple time scale analysis governed by the introduction of multi-timescales via a small parameter \(\varepsilon \) that is finite and strictly positive. The mass of the NES is small versus the mass of the master system, and it governs a mass ratio defining the small parameter \(\varepsilon \). The first timescale is the fast scale. Introducing the Manevitch complexification leads to the definition of slow time envelope coordinates. These envelope coordinates either do not directly depend on the fast time scale or do not depend on this fast time scale via introduction of the so-called Slow Invariant Manifold (SIM). The slow time dynamics of the master system components is analyzed through introduction of equilibrium points, corresponding to periodic solutions, or singular points (governing bifurcations around the SIM), corresponding to quasi-periodic behaviors. We present a simple example of semi-implicit Differential Algebraic Equation (DAE), including a friction term coupled to a cubic NES. Analytical developments of a 1:1:1 resonance case permit us to predict passive control of a DAI by a NES.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Moreau JJ (1988) Unilateral contact and dry friction in finite freedom dynamics. In: Non-smooth mechanics and applications, CISM courses and lectures, vol 302. Springer, Wien
Brogliato B (1996) Nonsmooth impact mechanics: models, dynamics and control. Springer, London
Jean M (1999) The non-smooth contact dynamics method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 177:235–257
Glocker C (2001) Set-valued force laws, dynamics of non-smooth systems. Springer, Berlin
Pfeiffer F, Foerg M, Ulbrich H (2006) Numerical aspects of non-smooth multibody dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 195:6891–6908
Acary V, Brogliato B (2008) Numerical methods for nonsmooth dynamical dystems: applications in mechanics and electronics. Springer, London
Leine RI, van de Wouw N (2008) Stability and convergence of mechanical systems with unilateral constraints. Springer, Berlin
Bastien J, Bernardin F, Lamarque C-H (2013) Non smooth deterministic or stochastic discrete dynamical systems: applications to models with friction or impact. Wiley-ISTE, Surrey
Roberson RE (1952) Synthesis of a nonlinear dynamic vibration absorber. J Franklin Inst 254:205–220
Frahm H, (1911) Device for damping vibrations of bodies. US 989958
Sevin E (1961) On the parametric excitation of pendulum-type vibration absorber. J Appl Mech 28:330–334
Haxton RS, Barr ADS (1972) The autoparametric vibration absorber. J Eng Ind 94:119–125
Rice HJ, McCarith JR (1987) Practical non-linear vibration absorber design. J Sound Vib 116:545–559
Ema S, Marui E (1996) Damping characteristics of an impact damper and its applications. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36:293–306
Vakakis AF, Gendelman OV (2000) Energy pumping in nonlinear mechanical oscillators: part II-resonance capture. J Appl Mech 68:42–48
Vakakis AF, Gendelman OV, Bergman LA, McFarland DM, Kerschen G, Lee YS (2009) Nonlinear targeted energy transfer in mechanical and structural systems, vol I & II. Springer, Netherlands
Lamarque C-H, Gendelman OV, Ture Savadkoohi A, Etcheverria E (2011) Targeted energy transfer in mechanical systems by means of non-smooth nonlinear energy sink. Acta Mech 221:175–200
Habib G, Kerschen G (2015) Suppression of limit cycle oscillations using the nonlinear tuned vibration absorber. Proc R Soc A-Math Phy 471:0140976
Ture Savadkoohi A, Lamarque C-H (2013) Dynamics of coupled Dahl type and non-smooth systems at different scales of time. Int J Bifurc Chaos 23:1350114
Lamarque C-H, Ture Savadkoohi A (2014) Dynamical behavior of a Bouc-Wen type oscillator coupled to a nonlinear energy sink. Meccanica 49:1917–1928
Schmidt F, Lamarque C-H (2010) Energy pumping for mechanical systems involving non-smooth Saint-Venant terms. Int J Non Linear Mech 45:866–875
Weiss M, Ture Savadkoohi A, Gendelman OV, Lamarque C-H (2014) Dynamical behavior of a mechanical system including Saint-Venant component coupled to a nonlinear energy sink. Int J Non Linear Mech 63:10–18
Lamarque C-H (2015) Ture savadkoohi: targeted energy transfer between a system with a set of Saint-Venant elements and a nonlinear energy sink. Contin Mech Thermodyn 27:819–833
Hairer E, Wanner G (1996) Springer series in computational mathematics. In: Solving ordinary differential equations II, stiff and differential-algebraic problems. Springer, Berlin (GMbH)
Manevitch LI (2001) The description of localized normal modes in a chain of nonlinear coupled oscillators using complex variables. Nonlinear Dyn 25:95–109
Ture Savadkoohi A, Lamarque C-H, Dimitrijevic Z (2012) Vibratory energy exchange between a linear and a nonsmooth system in the presence of the gravity. Nonlinear Dyn 70:1473–1483
Weiss M, Chenia M, Ture Savadkoohi A, Lamarque C-H, Vaurigaud B, Hammouda A (2016) Multi-scale energy exchanges between an elasto-plastic oscillator and a light nonsmooth system with external pre-stress. Nonlinear Dyn 83:109–135
Ture Savadkoohi A, Lamarque C-H, Weiss M, Vaurigaud B, Charlemagne S (2016) Analysis of the 1:1 resonant energy exchanges between coupled oscillators with rheologies. Nonlinear Dyn 86:2145–2159
Acknowledgements
The authors want to thank LABEX CELYA (ANR-10-LABX-0060) of the “Université de Lyon,” within the Investissement d’Avenir program (ANR-11-IDEX-0007), operated by the French National Research Agency(ANR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
APPENDIX 1 - Expressions of F and \(H_0\)
The function F is defined as
We have
and we assume that \(\phi _1, \phi _2\) do not depend on \(\tau _0\). Using the polar form \(\phi _j = N_j \exp (i \delta _j), j = 1, 2\), we also have
So, we obtain
where
and
Finally, we derive
and keeping the main orders of \(\varepsilon \), we have
APPENDIX 2 - Euler Implicit Numerical Scheme
Let us note that \(X_n = \left( \begin{array}{c}x_{1 n} \\ x_{2 n} \\ x_{3 n} \\ x_{4 n} \\ x_{5 n} \end{array}\right) \), \(X_{n+1} = \left( \begin{array}{c}x_{1 n+1} \\ x_{2 n+1} \\ x_{3 n+1} \\ x_{4 n+1} \\ x_{5n} \end{array}\right) \). Let \(X_0\) be given. For \(n \ge 0\), we have
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lamarque, CH., Ture Savadkoohi, A. (2018). Passive Control of Differential Algebraic Inclusions - General Method and a Simple Example. In: Leine, R., Acary, V., Brüls, O. (eds) Advanced Topics in Nonsmooth Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75972-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75972-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75971-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75972-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)