Analysing the Campaigns in Light of Their Professionalisation

  • Dalia Elsheikh
Part of the Political Campaigning and Communication book series (PCC)


This chapter aims to analyse the five studied election campaigns by comparing and analysing their structure (hardware) and strategies (software) based on the professionalisation index which was applied separately to each campaign in the previous chapter. By analysing the campaigns’ professionalism, the chapter explores which campaigns were more professional and tries to answer the question: did professionalisation play a role in determining the election results. In other words, was there a direct relationship between campaigns’ professionalism and the election results? The chapter argues that professionalisation played a significant role in the first round of elections which left both Morsi and Shafiq as the top two front runners, giving them the chance to compete again in the second round of elections. However, professionalisation did not play the same role in determining the result of the second round of elections, as there were other determinant factors such as voters resorting to punitive voting.


  1. Abdel Meguid, W., 2014. What does the term ‘deep state’ in Egypt mean? Al-Arabyia [online], 10 January 2014. Available from:ماذا-تعنى-الدولة-العميقة-فى-مصر؟.html [Accessed 28 January 2016].
  2. Abelson, R. P., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D. and Fiske, S. T., 1982. Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (4), 619–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahram Gate, 27/5/2012. Lawsuit in administrative court to stop elections opinion polls, as it influences the public opinion. Ahram Gate [online], 27 May 2012. Available from: [Accessed 28 January 2016].
  4. Al-akhbar, 2012. Interview with Khaled Aly. Al-akhbar [online], 17 May 2012. Available from: [Accessed 18 January 2017].
  5. Al-Arabiya, 29/11/2012. Battles of the constitution in Egypt between the majority and minority. Al Arabiya [online], 29 November 2012. Available from: [Accessed 1 November 2016].
  6. Al-Fagr, 22/5/2012. Elections polls are incomplete. Al-Fagr [online], 22 May 2012. Available from: [Accessed 28 January 2016].
  7. Al-Ississ, M. and Attah, S., 2014. Patronage and ideology in electoral behavior: evidence from Egypt’s first presidential elections. European Journal of Political Economy, 37 (2015), 241–248.Google Scholar
  8. Al-Saadawy, A., 2012. What the brotherhood lost [online], 12 July 2012. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available from: [Accessed 18 January 2017].
  9. Aswat Masriya, 24/5/2014. Challenging facing opinion polls in Egypt. Aswat Masriya [online], 25 May 2014. Available from: [Accessed 28 January 2016].
  10. Bass, B., 2011. Advantages & disadvantages of vertical organizational design. Small Business Chron [online], 16 August 2011. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].
  11. Benoit, W. L., 1999. Let’s put ‘debate’ into presidential debates. Rostrum, 74 (9), 21–24.Google Scholar
  12. Benoit, W. L., 2001. The functional approach to presidential television spots: acclaiming, attacking, defending 1952–2000. Communication Studies, 52 (2), 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Benoit, W. L., 2002. The primary decision: a functional analysis of debates in presidential primaries. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  14. Benoit, W. L., 2007. Communication in political campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  15. Bienkov, A., 2012. Astroturfing: what is it and why does it matter? The Guardian [online], 8 February 2012. Available from: [Accessed 1 November 2016].
  16. Blaydes, L., 2001. Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Boorstin, D. J., 1961. The image: a guide to pseudo-events in America. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  18. Burton, M. J. and Shea, D. M., 2015. Campaign craft: the strategies, tactics, and art of political campaign management. 5th edition. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  19. Chadwick, A., 2011. The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: the British prime minister and the ‘Bullygate’ affair. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16 (1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chaffee, S. H. and Rimal, R. N., 1996. Political persuasion and attitude change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Clevers, M. and Nimeh, Z., 2015. Pharaohs of the deep state: social capital in an obstinate regime [online]. The Netherlands: Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, UNU-MERIT. Working paper #2015-056. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].
  22. Coleman, S., 2000. Televised election debates: international perspectives. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Converse, P., 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass politics. In: Apter, D., ed. Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press, 206–261.Google Scholar
  24. Cwalina, W., Falkowski, A. and Kaid, L. L., 2000. Role of advertising in forming the image of politicians, comparative analysis of Poland, France, and Germany. Media Psychology, 2 (2), 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cwalina, W., Falkowski, A. and Newman, B., 2011. Political marketing: theoretical and strategic foundations. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  26. El Tarouty, S., 2015. Businessmen, clientelism, and authoritarianism in Egypt. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. El-Khoreiby, I., 2013. Towards the development of the voter’s choice behaviour model: analysis of the Egyptian 2012 presidential elections. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 6 (2/3), 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Elsebahy, N., 2013. The impact of social media outlets on the presidential elections: a case study on Egypt’s 2012 presidential elections. Thesis (MA). American University, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  29. Elsheikh, D., 2011. New form of opposition in Egypt … from movements to revolution. Thesis (MA). SOAS, University of London, England.Google Scholar
  30. Esser, F. and Strömbäck, J., 2012. Comparing election campaign communication. In: Esser, F. and Hanitzsch, T., eds. The handbook of comparative communication research. New York: Routledge, 289–307.Google Scholar
  31. Ezzabawy, Y., 2013. Funding elections campaigns in presidential elections 2012. In: Rabeea, A. H., ed. Presidential election 2012. Cairo: Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies, 171–204.Google Scholar
  32. Farrag, D., 2013. Brand image in politics: a case study of the 2012 Egyptian presidential election. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 4 (4), 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garzia, D., 2011. The personalization of politics in Western democracies: causes and consequences on leader–follower relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 22 (4), 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gibson, R. and Römmele, A., 2001. Changing campaign communications: a party-centered theory of professionalized campaigning. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6 (4), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gibson, R. and Römmele, A., 2009. Measuring the professionalization of political campaigning. Party Politics, 15 (3), 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Glass, D., 1985. Evaluating presidential candidates: Who focuses on their personal attributes? Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Green, D. and Gerber, A., 2008. Get out the vote: how to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  38. Griffin, D., 2010. Tall vs. flat organizational structure. Small Business Chron [online], 6 March 2010. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].
  39. Hill, B., 2011. The importance of a good organizational structure. Small Business Chron [online], 28 February 2011. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].
  40. Huebsch, R., 2010. The vertical structure vs. the horizontal structure in an organization. Small Business Chron [online], 9 August 2010. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].
  41. Ingram, D., 2011. Why is organizational structure important? Small Business Chron [online], 2 August 2011. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].
  42. Isotalus, P., 2011. Analyzing presidential debates: Functional theory and Finnish political communication culture. Nordicom Review, 32 (1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Isotalus, P. and Aarnio, E., 2006. A model of televised election discussion: the Finnish multi-party system perspective. Javnost – The Public, 13 (1), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson, D. W., 2001. No place for amateurs: how political consultants are reshaping American democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Joseph, C., 2017. Advantages & disadvantages of a vertical & horizontal organization. Small Business Chron [online]. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].
  46. Karvonen, L., 2010. The personalization of politics: a study of parliamentary democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  47. Khamis, S. and Mahmoud, A., 2013. Facebooking the Egyptian elections: framing the 2012 presidential race. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 6 (2,3), 134–155.Google Scholar
  48. Kriesi, H., 2012. Personalization of national election campaigns. Party Politics, 18 (6), 825–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lees-Marshment, J., 2001. Political marketing and British political parties: the party’s just begun. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lisi, M., 2013. The professionalization of campaigns in recent democracies: the Portuguese case. European Journal of Communication, 28 (3), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maarek, P. J., 2011. Campaign communication and political marketing / Philippe J. Maarek, n.p.: Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar
  52. Masoud, T., 2014. Counting Islam: religion, class, and elections in Egypt. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. McAllister, I., 2007. The personalization of politics. In: Dalton, R. J. and Klingemann, H. D., eds. The Oxford handbooks of political science: the Oxford handbook of political behavior. Oxford University Press, 571–588.Google Scholar
  54. Monbiot, G., 2011. The need to protect the internet from ‘astroturfing’ grows ever more urgent. The Guardian [online]. Available from: [Accessed 1 November 2016].
  55. Mykkänen, J. and Tenscher, J., 2014. Adding or weighting? Alternatives to measure parties’ campaign professionalism [online]. European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Glasgow 5 September 2014. Available from: [Accessed 1 June 2016].
  56. Norris, P., 2000. A virtuous circle: political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Ostroff, F., 1999. The horizontal organization: what the organization of the future actually looks like and how it delivers value to customers: what the organization of … like and how it delivers value to customers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Ottaway, M., 2013. The unfinished Egyptian transition. The National Interest [online], 25 January 2013. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].
  59. Paletz, D. L., 2002. The media in American politics: contents and consequences. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  60. Phillips, N. V., 2013. The impact of mass media uses and gratifications on voters: case of Egypt 2012 presidential elections. Thesis (MA). Center for Migration and Refugee Studies, American University in Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  61. Rabeea, A. H., 2013. Constitutional and legal environment to 2012 presidential elections. In: Rabeea, A. H., ed. Presidential election 2012. Cairo: Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies, 11–48.Google Scholar
  62. Rahat, G. and Sheafer, T., 2007. The personalization(s) of politics: Israel, 1949–2003. Political Communication, 41 (1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scammell, M., 1998. The wisdom of the war room: US campaigning and Americanization. Media, Culture and Society, 20 (2), 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scammell, M., 1999. Political marketing: lessons for political science. Political Studies, 47 (4), 718–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shehata, S., Hanna, M., Ottaway, M. and Slavin, B., 2012. Egyptian elections, round one [online]. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].
  66. Shoman, M. and Saleh, A., 2013. Campaigns’ strategies & tactics in 2012 presidential elections. In: Rabeea, A. H., ed. Presidential election 2012. Cairo: Al Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies, 205–239.Google Scholar
  67. Shukr, A., 2013. Elections results. In: Rabeea, A. H., ed. 2012 presidential elections. Cairo: Al Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies, 281–301.Google Scholar
  68. Sides, J., Shaw, D., Grossmann, M. and Lipsitz, K., 2012. Campaigns & elections: rules, reality, strategy, choice. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  69. Smith, G. and French, A., 2009. The political brand: a consumer perspective. Marketing Theory, 9 (2), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Chaffee, S. H., and Choe, S. Y., 1980. Time of decision and media use during the Ford-Carter Campaign. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 1, p. 53, JSTOR Journals.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Strömbäck, J., 2007. Political marketing and professionalized campaigning. A conceptual analysis. Journal of Political Marketing, 6 (2–3), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strömbäck, J., 2008. Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13 (3), 228–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Strömbäck, J., 2009. Selective professionalisation of political campaigning. A test of the party-centered theory of professionalised campaigning in the context of the 2006 Swedish election. Political Studies, 57 (1), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Strömbäck, J., Grandien, C., and Falasca, K., 2013. Do campaign strategies and tactics matter? Exploring party elite perceptions of what matters when explaining election outcomes. Journal of Public Affairs, 13 (1), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sullivan, J., 2010. Four basic elements of organizational structure. Small Business Chron [online], 6 April 2010. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].
  76. Tenscher, J., 2013. First- and second-order campaigning: evidence from Germany. European Journal of Communication, 28 (3), 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tenscher, J., Mykkänen, J., and Moring, T., 2012. Modes of professional campaigning: A four-country comparison in the European parliamentary elections, 2009. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17 (2), 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Trager, E., 2016. Arab Fall, how the Muslim Brotherhood won and lost Egypt in 891 days. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T. and Stanyer, J., 2012. The personalization of mediated political communication: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13 (2), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wattenberg, M. P., 1987. The hollow realignment: Partisan change in a candidate-centered era. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51 (1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wisconsin Advertising Project, 2017. An overview of the Wisconsin advertising project [online]. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Available from: [Accessed 1 January 2017].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dalia Elsheikh
    • 1
  1. 1.Bournemouth UniversityBournemouthUK

Personalised recommendations