Advertisement

Transmission Range Adjustment for Void Hole Avoidance in UWSNs

  • Mehreen Shah
  • Nadeem JavaidEmail author
  • Umar Rasheed
  • Faisal Hayat
  • Ghazanfar Latif
  • Zahoor Ali Khan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 17)

Abstract

Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) have captured interest of many researchers with the desire to control the large portion of the world overspread by water. Energy efficiency is one of the major concerns in UWSNs due to the limited energy of the underwater sensor nodes. In order to enhance the network lifetime, efficient and reliable protocols must be presented while considering the underwater acoustic communication challenges like low bandwidth, longer propagation delays and limited battery life of sensor nodes. In this paper, we present Modified Geographic and Opportunistic Depth Adjustment based Routing (MGEDAR) protocol to minimize the energy hole problem in UWSNs. Our protocol works by adaptively adjusting the transmission range of sensor nodes in case of void holes. Each node selects its forwarder on the basis of a cost function. Simulation results showed that our proposed scheme improves network performance in terms of maximum throughput, minimum energy consumption and reduced void holes.

References

  1. 1.
    Bouabdallah, F., Zidi, C., Boutaba, R.: Joint routing and energy management in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manage. 14(2), 456–471 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azam, I., Majid, A., Ahmad, I., Shakeel, U., Maqsood, H., Khan, Z. A., Javaid, N.: SEEC: sparsity-aware energy efficient clustering protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. In: 2016 IEEE 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp. 352–361. IEEE, March 2016Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    zidi, C., Bouabdallah, F., Boutaba, R.: Routing design avoiding energy holes in underwater acoustic sensor networks. Wirel. Commun. Mobile Comput. 16(14), 2035–2051 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walayat, A., Javaid, N., Akbar, M., Khan, Z.A.: MEES: mobile energy efficient square routing for underwater wireless sensor networks. In: 2017 IEEE 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp. 292–297. IEEE, March 2017Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cao, J., Dou, J., Dong, S.: Balance transmission mechanism in underwater acoustic sensor networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 11(3), 429340 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Javaid, N., Shah, M., Ahmad, A., Imran, M., Khan, M.I., Vasilakos, A.V.: An enhanced energy balanced data transmission protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Sensors 16(4), 487 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shah, M., Javaid, N., Imran, M., Guizani, M., Khan, Z. A., Qasim, U.: Interference aware inverse EEDBR protocol for underwater WSNs. In: 2015 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), pp. 739–744. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu, H., Yao, N., Wang, T., Li, G., Gao, Z., Tan, G.: WDFAD-DBR: weighting depth and forwarding area division DBR routing protocol for UASNs. Ad Hoc Netw. 37, 256–282 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xie, P., Cui, J.-H., Lao, L.: VBF: vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks. In: Networking, vol. 3976, pp. 1216–1221 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nicolaou, N., See, A., Xie, P., Cui, J. H., Maggiorini, D.: Improving the robustness of location-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In: Oceans 2007, Europe, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu, H., Yao, N., Liu, J.: An adaptive routing protocol in underwater sparse acoustic sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 34, 121–143 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coutinho, R.W., Boukerche, A., Vieira, L.F., Loureiro, A.A.: GEDAR: geographic and opportunistic routing protocol with depth adjustment for mobile underwater sensor networks. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 251–256. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hwang, D., Kim, D.: DFR: directional flooding-based routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. In: Oceans 2008, pp. 1–7. IEEE, September 2008Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehreen Shah
    • 1
  • Nadeem Javaid
    • 2
    Email author
  • Umar Rasheed
    • 1
  • Faisal Hayat
    • 1
  • Ghazanfar Latif
    • 2
  • Zahoor Ali Khan
    • 3
  1. 1.The University of LahoreIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.COMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.CISHigher Colleges of TechnologyAbu DhabiUAE

Personalised recommendations