Skip to main content

Ethnic and Economic Determinants of Migrant Location Choice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Frontiers in Interregional Migration Research

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

This chapter addresses the determinants of migrant location choice within the migrant’s adopted country. We focus on two sets of location determinants: economic determinants and ethnic (country of origin) determinants. Ethnic determinants are found to be important across a wide range of studies. By contrast, prior literature indicates that impacts of economic factors differ according to the characteristics both of locations and of migrants. The first part of the chapter summarises key findings of prior studies into migrant location choice, focusing on economic and ethnic determinants. Much of the literature in this field relates to migrants to the United States of America. The second part of the chapter extends knowledge of migrant location choice by considering another country that hosts a high proportion of international migrants, New Zealand. We draw on unit record New Zealand census data from 2013 for this analysis. The importance of ethnic (country of origin) networks is confirmed in this analysis but so too is the importance of economic factors. The latter finding is in contrast to much of the US based literature. It plausibly reflects the greater emphasis that New Zealand places on skills-based migration relative to the United States. At a technical level, this study uses the average regional wage of the industry in which the migrant is employed, together with region fixed effects, which may contribute to more precise estimates of wage effects than does the more standard use of average regional wages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This part highlights key findings rather than covering all relevant papers in the field.

  2. 2.

    Maré et al. 2012, 2016 focus on residential location decisions within a single city, Auckland, rather than across the country. These studies find that both self-identified ethnicity and country of birth are correlated with location choice within the city.

  3. 3.

    Note that LQ ij can be expressed equivalently as: \( \frac{Pop_{ij}/{Pop}_j}{Pop_i/ Pop} \).

  4. 4.

    The 2006 data are sourced from the Statistics New Zealand Infoshare database. LEED industry wages were aggregated for the small contiguous Marlborough, Nelson, Tasman and West Coast regions; Latin American and Other birth regions have been grouped since Latin America was not separately available.

  5. 5.

    An odds ratio greater than (less than) unity denotes a positive (negative) impact of that variable on location choice; statistical significance (relative to unity) at p < 0.05 is indicated through a coefficient shown in bold.

  6. 6.

    These fixed effects are estimated but are not reported explicitly in Table 9.4.

  7. 7.

    One other explanation for this result is a simple arithmetic one in that a migrant will inflate the proportion of own-group migrants in their own area. This explanation may be particularly relevant for the estimates using 2013 explanatory variable data. The finding that the size of the interaction term is almost equivalent across columns (3) and (6) suggests that this is not the (sole) reason for the significant positive result.

  8. 8.

    One region (Northland) is omitted as the base region. We do not present all 225 coefficients (15 regions × 15 terms per region), instead summarising the key results in the text.

References

  • Alba RD, Logan JR (1993) Minority proximity to whites in suburbs: an individual-level analysis of segregation. Am J Sociol 98(6):1388–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen J, Turner E (1996) Spatial patterns of immigrant assimilation. Prof Geogr 48(2):140–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartel AP (1989) Where do the new U.S. immigrants live? J Labor Econ 7(4):371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battisti M, Peri G, Romiti A (2016) Dynamic effects of co-ethnic networks on immigrants’ economic success. NBER working paper 22389, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer TK, Epstein GS, Gang IN (2002) Herd effects or migration networks? The location choice of Mexican immigrants in the US. Discussion paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=327560

  • Bauer T, Epstein GS, Gang IN (2005) Enclaves, language, and the location choice of migrants. J Popul Econ 18(4):649–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer T, Epstein G, Gang IN (2007) The influence of stocks and flows on migrants’ location choices. Res Labor Econ 26(6):199–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer T, Epstein GS, Gang IN (2009) Measuring ethnic linkages among migrants. Int J Manpow 30(1/2):56–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas GJ (2001) Does immigration grease the wheels of the labor market. Brook Pap Econ Act 1:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Börnisch-Brednich B (2002) Keeping a low profile: an oral history of german immigration to New Zealand. Victoria University Press, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington WJ, Detragiache E, Vishwanath T (1996) Migration with endogenous moving costs. Am Econ Rev 86(4):909–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang-Richards A, Wilkinson S, Seville E, Brunsdon D (2012) Resourcing the canterbury rebuild: changes and emerging themes. Research paper. http://www.resorgs.org.nz/images/stories/pdfs/Reconstructionfollowingdisaster/case_study_report_resourcing.pdf

  • Chiswick B, Miller P (2004) Where immigrants settle in the United States. IZA discussion paper No. 1231. Bonn

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church J, King I (1983) Bilingualism and network externalities. Can J Econ 26(2):337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins F, Friesen W (2011) Making the most of diversity? The intercultural city project and a rescaled version of diversity in Auckland, New Zealand. Urban Stud 48(14):3067–3085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan S (2011) Space matters: agglomeration economies and spatial competition in New Zealand. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton G, Puga D (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Henderson VJ, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2063–2117

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein GS (2008) Herd and network effects in migration decision-making. J Ethn Migr Stud 34(4):567–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen W (2012) International and internal migration dynamics in a pacific gateway city: Asian migrants into and out of Auckland. N Z Popul Rev 38:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Gang IN, Zimmermann KF (2000) Is child like parent? Educational attainment and ethnic origin. J Hum Resour 35(3):550–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JR, Todaro MP (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. Am Econ Rev 60(1):126–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger DA (2000) Local labor markets, admission categories, and immigrant location choice. College of William and Mary. http://www.iza.org/conference_files/amm_2004/jaeger_d138.pdf

  • Jaeger DA (2006) Green cards and the location choices of immigrants in the United States, 1971–2000. Discussion paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=905545

  • Lancee B (2012) Immigrant performance in the labour market: bonding and bridging social capital. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter DT, Johnson KM (2006) Emerging rural settlement patterns and the geographic redistribution of America’s new immigrants. Rural Sociol 71(1):109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maré DC, Morten M, Stillman S (2007) Settlement patterns and the geographic mobility of recent migrants to New Zealand. N Z Econ Pap 41:163–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Maré DC, Pinkerton RM, Poot J, Coleman A (2012) Residential sorting across Auckland neighbourhoods. N Z Popul Rev 38:23–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Maré DC, Pinkerton RM, Poot J (2016) Residential assimilation of immigrants: a cohort approach. Migr Stud 4(3):373–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in economics. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Munshi K (2003) Networks in the modern economy: Mexican migrants in the U.S. labor market. Q J Econ 118(2):549–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Government (n.d.) Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) policy. http://employment.govt.nz/initiatives/strategy/rse/index.asp. Accessed 2 Nov 2015

  • Statistics New Zealand (2014) 2013 census CURF: user guide. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • White P (1998) The settlement patterns of developed world migrants in London. Urban Stud 35(10):1725–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M, Kim SS (2006) Community forces, social capital, and educational achievement: the case of supplementary education in the Chinese and Korean immigrant communities. Harv Educ Rev 76(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this chapter was submitted as a dissertation for the degree of BCom(Hons) at University of Auckland by the first author. We thank an anonymous referee for comments on an earlier version of this chapter. Access to the data used in this study was provided by Statistics New Zealand under conditions designed to keep individual information secure in accordance with requirements of the Statistics Act 1975. The opinions presented are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent an official view of Statistics New Zealand, or of the authors’ institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Grimes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smart, C., Grimes, A., Townsend, W. (2018). Ethnic and Economic Determinants of Migrant Location Choice. In: Biagi, B., Faggian, A., Rajbhandari, I., Venhorst, V. (eds) New Frontiers in Interregional Migration Research. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75886-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics