Major Constraints Facing Women as Peacemakers and Peacebuilders

  • Sidonia Angom
Part of the The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science book series (APESS, volume 22)


Women have continued to be systematically side-lined in peacemaking, transitional justice and peacebuilding processes, even though the importance of comprehensive inclusion and involvement of women in peace and security for post-conflict societies has been adopted by UNSCR 1325. This resolution recognised the impact of armed conflict and “acknowledged the underestimated and untapped potential of women as effective decision-makers and negotiators” in peace processes. Women’s role in and relationship to conflict is complex, but they are visibly present in a number of roles, including victim-survivors, combatants, casualties, and the displaced, but also as activists against violence and conflict or as supporters. Women in northern Uganda were no exception to these challenges. To build sustainable peace, women’s rights and gender issues, including gender mainstreaming, should be acknowledged and incorporated at every stage of the peace processes. To help women better perform within peacemaking and peacebuilding processes, efforts need to be made to improve women’s education, skills and training, including strengthening women’s organisations and networks through long-term and sustainable financial support.


Gender Gender Balance Gender Equality Gender Specific Security Needs Gender roles Gender Training Good governance Sexual Violence 


  1. Focus group discussion with women and men (Gulu, 29 August 2009).Google Scholar
  2. Focus group discussion with women and men (Gulu, 11 January 2010).Google Scholar
  3. Focus group discussion with women (Kitgum, 29 June 2010).Google Scholar
  4. Focus group discussion with women (Pader, 20 July 2010).Google Scholar
  5. Interview with Geoffre Okello, Coordination NGO Forum (Gulu: 19 August 2009).Google Scholar
  6. Interview with Gladys Canogura, Chairperson KIWEPI (Kitgum, 29 June 2010).Google Scholar
  7. Lule, C., 2012: “Donor Cuts Shs. 70b Aid over OPM Fraud”, in: Daily Monitor (27 October).Google Scholar
  8. Mugasha, C., 2012: “Local Leaders Against New Districts”, in: New Vision (17 September).Google Scholar
  9. Mugerwa, Y., 2012: “Pressure on Government to Suspend Bigirimana”, in: Daily Monitor (31 October)Google Scholar
  10. Office of the Prime Minister, GoU, 2012: PRDP 2 for Northern Uganda Final Official Plan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Constituent College of AgricultureGulu UniversityMoroto, KaramojaUganda

Personalised recommendations