Skip to main content

Resilience Matrix for Comprehensive Urban Resilience Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Resilience-Oriented Urban Planning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 65))

Abstract

The Resilience Matrix is a framework for the performance assessment of integrated complex systems. This chapter reviews the development of the matrix then describes two case studies and discusses lessons learned. The structure is a 4 × 4 matrix; the rows describe the four general management domains of any complex system (physical, information, cognitive, social) as described in the US Army’s Network-Centric Warfare doctrine and the columns describe the four stages of disaster management (plan/prepare, absorb/withstand, recover, adapt) as defined by the US National Academy of Sciences in their definition of disaster resilience. Collectively, these sixteen cells provide a general description of the functionality of a system through an adverse event. The matrix serves as an organizing framework for a screening-level assessment of the resilience of a system with respect to each critical service it provides. Indicators linked to each cell can be used to describe system performance and identify areas for further investigation. Additionally, the matrix framework can be used to organize the many government agencies and community institutions across different spatial scales that contribute to the operation of each critical service. In this way the matrix serves as a tool to initiate resilience planning and coordination, address jurisdictional issues, and identify gaps in the various roles and responsibilities for complex urban systems where human performance and decision making plays a critical role. The case studies described here (Rockaway, New York City and Mobile, Alabama, USA) are focused on coastal community resilience in the face of storm surge and flooding; however, the lessons learned speak to the broader contribution of the resilience matrix to the fields of risk assessment and urban planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberts DS, Hayes RE (2003) Power to the edge: command… control… in the information age. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense Washington DC Command and Control Research Program (CCRP). Retrieved from http://www.dodccrp.org/files/Alberts_Power.pdf

  • Arnold JL (1988) The evolution of the 1936 flood control act. Office of History, US Army Corps of Engineers

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakkensen LA, Fox‐Lent C, Read LK, Linkov I (2016) Validating resilience and vulnerability indices in the context of natural disasters. Risk Anal

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake ES, Kimberlain TB, Berg RJ, Cangialosi JP, Beven JL II (2013) Tropical cyclone report hurricane sandy (AL182012) 22–29 October 2012. National Hurricane Center. 12 Feb 2013. Accessed 19 June 2017 at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL182012_Sandy.pdf

  • Bruneau M (2006) Enhancing the resilience of communities against extreme events from an earthquake engineering perspective. J Secur Educ 1:159–167. https://doi.org/10.1300/J460v01n04_14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL et al (2013) Disaster resilience: a national imperative. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Develop 55(2):25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg DA, Park J, Bates ME, Fox-Lent C, Seager TP, Linkov I (2014) Resilience metrics: lessons from military doctrines. Solutions 5(5):76–87

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2016) Resilience. In: European civil protection and humanitarian aid operations. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/what/humanitarian-aid/resilience_en. Updated 6 Aug 2016. Accessed 19 June 2017

  • Fox-Lent C, Bates ME, Linkov I (2015) A matrix approach to community resilience assessment: an illustrative case at Rockaway Peninsula. Environ Sys Decisions 35(2):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Moberg E (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis: environmental applications and case studies. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Daniel AE, Matthew EB, Derek C, Matteo C, Julia HA, Stephen EF, Thomas PS (2013) Measurable resilience for actionable policy, pp 10108–10110

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Bridges T, Creutzig F, Decker J, Fox-Lent C, Kröger W, … Nyer R (2014) Changing the resilience paradigm. Nat Clim Change 4(6):407–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser DA (2011) The use of risk analysis by the US army corps of engineers. J Contem Water Res Edu 103(1):6

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Rising Community Reconstruction Rockaway East Planning Committee (2014) Rockaway East NY rising community reconstruction plan. Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery. Available at: https://stormrecovery.ny.gov/nyrcr/final-plans. Accessed 21 June 2017

  • Norris FH et al (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol 41(1–2):127–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Renschler CS et al (2010) A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: the PEOPLES resilience framework. US Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology, Office of Applied Economics Engineering Laboratory NIST GCR, pp 10–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann R, Herder T (2014) The mobile bay estuary and coastal population growth: the challenge of keeping what we’ve got. Alabama’s TREASURED Forests. Spring

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House (2013) Presidential policy directive 21: critical infrastructure security and resilience (PPD-21) (Feb. 12, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Touzinsky K, Rosati J, Fox-Lent C, Becker A, Luscher A (2016) Advancing coastal systems resilience research: improving quantification tools through community feedback. Shore & Beach 84(4):30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cate Fox-Lent .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fox-Lent, C., Linkov, I. (2018). Resilience Matrix for Comprehensive Urban Resilience Planning. In: Yamagata, Y., Sharifi, A. (eds) Resilience-Oriented Urban Planning. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 65. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75797-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75798-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics