Advertisement

Is Connectivity a Desirable Property in Urban Resilience Assessments?

  • Marta Olazabal
  • Lorenzo Chelleri
  • Ayyoob Sharifi
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 65)

Abstract

The need to look at environmental-related problems from a systemic perspective has been increasingly highlighted in current scientific literature. Especially in a context of climate change uncertainty, it is helpful to identify interdependencies and cascading impacts that might happen under certain management or policy scenarios. In the context of resilience management and given the inherent complexity of cities, this becomes especially relevant if one considers potential trade-offs or perverse transformability interventions that may have negative impacts on environmental quality, social equity or well-being. The network perspective in resilience theory has been argued to be useful to assess system’s robustness, connectivity and dependency. Connectivity as a characteristic of the system, has been particularly presented as a determinant of urban resilience in the literature, but, so far and to our knowledge, no study has presented empirical evidence on this regard. To contribute to this debate, this chapter uses a case study on urban energy resilience in the city of Bilbao (Spain) to illustrate the role of connectivity in an urban system and its positive and negative effects on resilience and transformability. Main findings point out the context-specific nature of this property of the system and the difficulty of establishing a normative desirable trend.

Keywords

Urban complexity Urban resilience Resilience trade-offs Assessment Indicators Connectivity Network perspective 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Marta Olazabal acknowledges funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 653522 (RESIN—Climate Resilient Cities and Infrastructures project). Marta Olazabal holds a fellowship by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) (grant no. FPDI-2013-16631). The authors also acknowledge support from the National Institute for Environmental Studies.

References

  1. Ahern J (2013) Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landsc Ecol 28:1203–1212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahern J (2011) From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landsc Urban Plan Landsc Urban Plann 100(100):341–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
  3. Albers M, Deppisch S (2013) Resilience in the light of climate change: useful approach or empty phrase for spatial planning? Eur Plan Stud 21:1598–1610.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722961 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alberti M, Marzluff JM (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosyst 7:241–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen P (2012) Cities: the visible expression of co-evolving complexity. In: Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, Tan E (eds) Complexity theories of cities have come of age: an overview with implications to urban planning and design. Springer, Heidelberg, New York, pp 67–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aminzadeh B, Khansefid M (2009) A case study of urban ecological networks and a sustainable city: Tehran’s metropolitan area. Urban EcosystGoogle Scholar
  8. Andersson E (2006) Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecol Soc 11:34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Andersson E, Barthel S, Borgström S, Colding J, Elmqvist T, Folke C, Gren Å (2014) Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. Ambio 43:445–453.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Anguelovski I, Shi L, Chu E, Gallagher D, Goh K, Lamb Z, Reeve K, Teicher H (2016) Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation critical perspectives from the global north and south. J Plan Educ Res 0739456X16645166.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x16645166
  11. Basque Government (2013) Udalmap—Municipal information system of the Basque Country [WWW Document]. URL http://www.ogasun.ejgv.euskadi.net/r51-udalmape/en/contenidos/informacion/udalmap/en_udalmap/udalmap.html. Accessed 1 Aug 2014
  12. Batty M (2007) Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Batty M (2008) The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319:769–771.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Batty M (2013a) The new science of cities. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  15. Batty M (2013b) Resilient cities, networks, and disruption. Environ Plan B-Plan Des 40:571–573.  https://doi.org/10.1068/b4004ed
  16. Bettencourt LMA (2013) The origins of scaling in cities. Science 340:1438–1441.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235823 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Bohland J, Davoudi S, Knox P, Lawrence J (eds) (2017) The resilience machine. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Brand FS, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc 00001:12Google Scholar
  19. Castellani B, Hafferty FW (2009) Sociology and complexity science: a new field of inquiry. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  20. Chelleri L, Olazabal M (2012) Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience. Basque centre for Climate Change (BC3), BilbaoGoogle Scholar
  21. Chelleri L, Waters JJ, Olazabal M, Minucci G (2015) Resilience trade-offs: addressing multiple scales and temporal aspects of urban resilience. Environ Urban 27(1):181–198.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247814550780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Montis A, Caschili S, Mulas M, Modica G, Ganciu A, Bardi A, Ledda A, Dessena L, Laudari L, Fichera CR (2016) Urban–rural ecological networks for landscape planning. Land Use Policy 50:312–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elmqvist T, Colding J, Barthel S, Borgstrom S, Duit A, Lundberg J, Andersson E, Ahrne K, Ernstson H, Folke C, Bengtsson J (2003) The dynamics of social-ecological systems in urban landscapes—Stockholm and the National Urban Park, Sweden. In: AlfsenNorodom C, Lane BD, Corry M (eds) Conference on urban biosphere and society—partnership of cities. New York Acad Sciences, New York, NY, pp 308–322Google Scholar
  24. Ernstson H, van der Leeuw SE, Redman CL, Meffert DJ, Davis G, Alfsen C, Elmqvist T (2010) Urban transitions: on urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio 39:531–545.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fath BD, Scharler UM, Ulanowicz RE, Hannon B (2007) Ecological network analysis: network construction. Ecol Model 208:49–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gobattoni F, Pelorosso R, Lauro G, Leone A, Monaco R (2011) A procedure for mathematical analysis of landscape evolution and equilibrium scenarios assessment. Landsc Urban Plan 103:289–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gonzalez S (2011) Bilbao and Barcelona “in Motion”. How urban regeneration “models” travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Stud 48:1397–1418.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010374510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gray SA, Gray S, De Kok JL, Helfgott AER, O’Dwyer B, Jordan R, Nyaki A (2015) Using fuzzy cognitive mapping as a participatory approach to analyze change, preferred states, and perceived resilience of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 20:00001.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07396-200211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hosseini S, Barker K, Ramirez-Marquez JE (2016) A review of definitions and measures of system resilience. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 145:47–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Isak KGQ, Wildenberg M, Adamescu CM, Skov F, De Blust G (2009) Manual for applying fuzzy cognitive mapping—experiences from ALTER-Net. A Long-Term Biodiversity, Ecosystem and Awareness Research Network. ALTER-Net, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Janssen MA, Bodin O, Anderies JM, Elmqvist T, Ernstson H, McAllister RRJ, Olsson P, Ryan P (2006) Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11:1–15Google Scholar
  34. Keating M, de Frantz M (2004) Culture-led strategies for urban regeneration: a comparative perspective on Bilbao. Int J Iber Stud 16:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kinzig AP, Ryan P, Etienne M, Allison H, Elmqvist T, Walker BH (2006) Resilience and regime shifts: assessing cascading effects. Ecol, Soc, p 11Google Scholar
  36. Kok K (2009) The potential of fuzzy cognitive maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Glob Environ Change 19:122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kosko B (1986) Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Man-Mach Stud 24:65–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(86)80040-2 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Labaka L, Hernantes J, Sarriegi JM (2015) Resilience framework for critical infrastructures: an empirical study in a nuclear plant. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 141:92–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lansing JS (2003) Complex adaptive systems. Annu Rev Anthropol 32:183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levin SA, Barrett S, Aniyar S, Baumol W, Bliss C, Bolin B, Dasgupta P, Ehrlich P, Folke C, Gren I-M, Holling CS, Jansson A, Jansson B-O, Mäler K-G, Martin D, Perrings C, Sheshinski E (1998) Resilience in natural and socioeconomic systems. Environ Dev Econ 3:221–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ling C, Dale A (2011) Nature, place and the creative class: three Canadian case studies. Landsc Urban Plan 99:239–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provencher W, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Taylor WW (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu J, Mooney H, Hull V, Davis SJ, Gaskell J, Hertel T, Lubchenco J, Seto KC, Gleick P, Kremen C, Li S (2015) Systems integration for global sustainability. Science 347:1258832.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258832 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meerow S, Newell JP (2016) Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why? Urban Geogr 0001:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M (2016) Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 147:38–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Molotch H (1976) The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. Am J Sociol 82:309–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Olazabal M (2017) Resilience, sustainability and transformability of cities as complex adaptive systems. In: Regions Urban (ed) Urban Regions Now & Tomorrow, Studien Zur Resilienzforschung. Springer, Germany, pp 73–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Olazabal M, Pascual U (2015) Urban low-carbon transitions: cognitive barriers and opportunities. J Clean Prod 109:336–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Olazabal M, Pascual U (2016) Use of fuzzy cognitive maps to study urban resilience and transformation. Environ Innov Soc Transit 18:18–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Olazabal M, Reckien D (2015) Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping: applications to urban environmental decision-making. In: Ruth M (ed) Handbook of research methods and applications in environmental studies. Edward Elgar Publishing, p 576Google Scholar
  51. Özesmi U, Özesmi SL (2004) Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecol Model 176:43–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM (2004) Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landsc Urban Plan 69:369–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurpbplan.2003.10.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Boone CG, Groffman PM, Irwin E, Kaushal SS, Marshall V, McGrath BP, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Troy A, Warren P (2011) Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J Environ Manage 92:331–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Portugali J (2000) Self-Organization and the city. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Portugali J, Meyer H, Stolk E, Tan E (eds) (2012) Complexity theories of cities have come of age: an overview with implications to urban planning and design. Springer, Heidelberg; New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Ruth M, Coelho D (2007) Understanding and managing the complexity of urban systems under climate change. Clim Policy 7:317–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Samet RH (2013) Complexity, the science of cities and long-range futures. Futures 47:49–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sharifi A (2016) A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience. Ecol Indic 69:629–647.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sharifi A, Yamagata Y (2016) Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: a literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:1654–1677.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. UN-HLPGS (2012) Resilient people, resilient planet: a future worth choosing, Overview United Nations. United Nations Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Global Sustainability, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Vale LJ (2014) The politics of resilient cities: whose resilience and whose city? Build Res Inf 42:191–201.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.850602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vanwindekens FM, Stilmant D, Baret PV (2013) Development of a broadened cognitive mapping approach for analysing systems of practices in social-ecological systems. Ecol Model 250:352–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.11.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J (1999) Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems 2:95–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wallace D, Wallace R (2008) Urban systems during disasters: factors for resilience. Ecol Soc 0001:13Google Scholar
  66. Zhang Y, Yang ZF, Yu XY (2009) Ecological network and emergy analysis of urban metabolic systems: model development, and a case study of four chinese cities. Ecol Model 220:1431–1442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Olazabal
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Chelleri
    • 2
  • Ayyoob Sharifi
    • 3
  1. 1.Basque Centre for Climate Change, BC3LeioaSpain
  2. 2.School of ArchitectureUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya (UCI)BarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.National Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations