SEA for Sustainable Cities: How the Strategic Environmental Assessment Has Driven the ESI Programme Towards Urban Sustainability

Conference paper
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)


Under Cohesion Policy, sustainable development is implemented at the territorial level through the five European Structural and Investment funds (ESIF). Among the uses for these funds, during the 2014–2020 period the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) key priority areas include issues such as energy, transport, climate change adaptation and green infrastructure, all of which relate to sustainable cities. In this framework, the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) procedure, carried out in the programming phase, is an important tool in driving ERDF Operational Programmes (OPs) towards sustainability. In this work, we examine 20 ERDF Italian program 2014–2020 and some related SEA Environmental reports to understand how much the theme of sustainable cities has been considered and how far SEA procedures have contributed to urban sustainability planning in local development strategies. Illustrations are given of sustainable approaches adopted in the OPs and SEA reports. Moreover, the analysis identifies recommendations to improve integration of the theme into the current and following programming periods.


Strategic environmental assessment ESIF-ERDF programmes Urban sustainable development approaches SEA environmental reports 


  1. Arce, R., & Gullón, N. (2000). The application of strategic environmental assessment to sustainability assessment of infrastructure development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3), 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. European Commission. (2014). Accordo di partenariato—CCI2014IT16M8PA001. Decision C (2014) 8021 final.Google Scholar
  3. European Environment Agency. (2006). Corinne land Cover database.Google Scholar
  4. European Union. (2013). Regulation No 1301/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013, on the European Regional Development Fund and on specific provisions concerning the Investment for growth and jobs goal and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006.Google Scholar
  5. European Union. (2014). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 184/2014.Google Scholar
  6. Haughton, G. (1999). Environmental justice and the sustainable city. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(3), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. He, J., Bao, C. K., Shu, T. F., Yun, X. X., Jiang, D., & Brown, L. (2011). Framework for integration of urban planning, strategic environmental assessment and ecological planning for urban sustainability within the context of China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(6), 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shepherd, A., & Ortolano, L. (1996). Strategic environmental assessment for sustainable urban development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4), 321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. While, A., Jonas, A. E. G., & Gibbs, D. (2004). The environment and the entrepreneurial city: Searching for the urban ‘sustainability; fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 549–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wu, J. J. (2008). Making the case for landscape ecology an effective approach to urban sustainability. Landscape Journal, 27(1), 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wu, J. J. (2010). Urban sustainability: An inevitable goal of landscape research. Landscape Ecology, 25, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations