The EU project SmartReFlex—smart and flexible, 100%-renewable district heating and cooling systems for European cities—aims to promote the massive use of renewable sources for heating and cooling in cities through district heating networks. Among the project activities, the analysis of real case studies shows the potential of renewables in district heating systems. AIRU, Italian Association of District Heating, and the Department of Energy of Politecnico di Milano are supporting the promotion of local initiatives for renewable networks in the Emilia Romagna region: the feasibility of a multisource DHC system in Mirandola is assessed and presented in this paper. In Mirandola’s district heating and cooling system, natural gas is only one among several possible energy sources: alternative configurations integrating biomass, biogas and solar thermal have been included in the study. The analysis deals with the extension of the network and with the choice of the best new energy source to cover the new heat demand. The use of MCDA has been applied in order to perform a holistic analysis of possible energy-related choices by considering competing objectives. For instance, the use of biomass is quite controversial: biomass is a renewable, local and a CO2 neutral source, able to reduce GHG emissions. However, biomass burning can have negative impacts on air quality by producing pollutants such as PM10, BaP, SOx and NOx. This paper presents the multicriteria process applied to plant design, the various alternatives and the criteria used. The result is a combination of natural gas, biogas, solar thermal energy and biomass, which corresponds to the preference of both the utility and municipality.
- District heating
- Renewable energy
- Sustainable planning
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
ARPA, & Regione Emilia, R. (2010). Aggiornamento Inventario Regionale delle Emissioni in Atmosfera Anno 2010 (Vol. 2010).
Baños, R., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Montoya, F. G., Gil, C., Alcayde, A., & Gómez, J. (2011). Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(4), 1753–1766.
Bentsen, N. S., & Møller, I. M. (2017). Solar energy conserved in biomass: Sustainable bioenergy use and reduction of land use change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 954–958.
Calvert, K., & Mabee, W. (2015). More solar farms or more bioenergy crops? Mapping and assessing potential land-use conflicts among renewable energy technologies in eastern Ontario, Canada. Applied Geography, 56, 209–221.
Connolly, D., Mathiesen, B. V., Østergaard, P. A., Möller, B., Nielsen, S., Lund, H., et al. (2012). Heat roadmap Europe 2050—First pre-study for EU 27 for Euro heat & power. Brussels: Aalborg University.
Connolly, D., Mathiesen, B. V., Østergaard, P. A., Möller, B., Nielsen, S., Lund, H., et al. (2013). Heat roadmap Europe 2050—Second pre-study for EU27 for Euro heat & Power. Brussels: Aalborg University.
Dénarié, A., Calderoni, M., & Muscherà, M. (2017). Technical, financial and Urban potentials for solar district heating in Italy. In A. Bisello, D. Vettorato, R. Stephens, & P. Elisei (Eds.), Smart and sustainable planning for cities and regions: Results of SSPCR 2015 (pp. 15–32). Cham: Springer.
Dénarié, A., Calderoni, M., Nourrice, K. S., & Acerbis, S. (2016). Solar and biomass for Italian communities: Analysis of two case studies. In International Solar District Heating Conference, Billund.
Edwards, W., & Barron, F. H. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 306–325.
Genon, G., Torchio, M. F., Poggio, A., & Poggio, M. (2009). Energy and environmental assessment of small district heating systems: Global and local effects in two case-studies. Energy Conversion and Management, 50(3), 522–529.
Jonsson, A., & Hillring, B. (2006). Planning for increased bioenergy use—Evaluating the impact on local air quality. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30(6), 543–554.
Kablan, M. M. (2004). Decision support for energy conservation promotion: An analytic hierarchy process approach. Energy Policy, 32(10), 1151–1158.
Liu, W., Zhang, Z., Xie, X., Yu, Z., von Gadow, K., Xu, J., et al. (2017). Analysis of the global warming potential of biogenic CO2 emission in life cycle assessments. Scientific Reports, 7(January), 484–489.
Mathiesen, B. V., Lund, H., & Connolly, D. (2012). Limiting biomass consumption for heating in 100% renewable energy systems. Energy, 48(1), 160–168.
Neumann, J. V., & Morgenstern, O. (1953). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83.
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
Wang, J. J., Jing, Y. Y., Zhang, C. F., & Zhao, J. H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2263–2278.
The work presented in this paper is a result of the work undertaken in SmartReFlex project (IEE/13/434/SI2.674873) that was co-financed by the Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE) EU programme.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dénarié, A., Calderoni, M., Aprile, M. (2018). Multicriteria Approach for a Multisource District Heating. In: Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Laconte, P., Costa, S. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2017. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75773-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75774-2