Skip to main content

Public and Private Benefits in Urban Development Agreements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions (SSPCR 2017)

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

The paper is aimed at exploring the advantages of public authorities within the context of negotiating Public Private Partnership (PPP). During recent years, many European cities have developed complex urban interventions through innovative forms of cooperation between the public and private sector. Given the limited public funds to cover investments and the need to increase the quality and efficiency of public services, this kind of PPP enables public and private sectors to define agreements with respect to future urban development interventions. Starting from an analysis of the urban developments under PPP carried out in Lombardy region over the last 15 years, the paper provides an overview of surplus values that result from land-use changes and development with the aim of pointing out the allocation between public and private parties. Despite the difficulty of performing an ex-post evaluation of surplus values, meaning the difference between the asset values before and after transformation, mainly for the limited and incomplete economic data recorded by the agreement, some preliminary insights are drawn, and a first operational framework is suggested to evaluate the sustainability of the urban development interventions from a public perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    LR. 22/86, LR. 23/1990.

References

  • Alterman, R. (2012). Land use regulations and property values: The ‘windfalls capture’ idea revisited. In N. Brooks, K. Donanghy, & G. Knapp (Eds.), Oxford handbook on urban economics and planning (pp. 755–786). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J. (1992). The economics of planning gain: A re-appraisal. Urban Studies, 29(8), 1329–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R. (2008). Il finanziamento della città pubblica. In M. Baioni (Ed.), La costruzione della città pubblica (pp. 39–56). Firenze: Alinea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codecasa, G., & Ponzini, D. (2011). Public-private partnership: A delusion for urban regeneration? Evidence from Italy. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 647–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curti, F. (2006). Lo scambio leale. Roma: Officina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P., Purdue, M., & Ennis, F. (1992). Rationales for planning gain. Policy Studies, 13(2), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P., Ennis, F., & Purdue, M. (1995). Negotiating development. London: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micelli, E. (2004). Perequazione urbanistica. Pubblico e privato per la trasformazione della città. Venezia: Marsilio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micelli, E. (2011). La gestione dei piani urbanistici. Perequazione, accordi, incentivi. Venezia: Marsilio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morano, P., & Manganelli, B. (2014). La stima delle aree fabbricabili a fini imu. Proposte per il superamento delle inadeguatezze nelle procedure messe a punto dai Comuni. Valori e Valutazioni, 12, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). The governance of land use in OECD countries policy analysis and recommendations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppio, A., & Torrieri, F. (2016). Supporting private public partnership for economic and financial feasibility. Social and Behavioural Science, 223, 62–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salling, K. B., & Leleur, S. (2006). Assessment of transport appraisal by the use of Monte Carlo simulation: The CBA-DK model. In Proceedings of WSC’ 06, Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanghellini, S., & Copiello, S. (2011). Urban models in Italy: Partnership forms, territorial contexts, tools, and results. In R. Dalla Longa (Ed.), Urban models and public-private partnership. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Oppio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Oppio, A., Torrieri, F. (2018). Public and Private Benefits in Urban Development Agreements. In: Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Laconte, P., Costa, S. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2017. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75773-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75774-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics