Skip to main content

You Press the Button, We Do the Rest. Personal Archiving in Capture Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards a Philosophy of Digital Media
  • 541 Accesses

Abstract

In today’s abundance of media technological devices we engage in capturing ever more detailed aspects of everyday lives. Due to the constant state of connectivity with human and non-human actors of the network society, the boundaries between voluntary and involuntary capture and archiving become ever more blurred. In the context of ubiquitous technologies we have become at once micro-archivists and micro-archives, or, differently put, subjects and objects of pervasively radiating micro-temporal of the arts in relation to Bernard of capture, mediation and storage of our digitized life-bits. In this chapter, the author problematizes this state of the arts in relation to Bernard Stiegler’s concepts of mnemotechniques and mnemotechnologies. The transition from one to the other can be seen as a mutation from low-tech manual techniques of handling one’s memory to large-scale, automated mnemonic industries which, while providing immediate solutions for capturing and organizing the flows of memories, simultaneously benefit from them economically. The author argues that mnemotechnologies concerned with capturing have been eroding the use and significance of the term “recording”. He demonstrates this erosion along the trajectory from amateur practices of snap-shooting (enabled first by mass-produced cameras such as the Brownie) to ubiquitous computing of digital snapshots such as Facebook. What follows this discussion is a brief turn toward counter-practices that attempt to disrupt this current techno-political condition. Drawing on the concept of the post-digital, which through its call for a return to craft seems to correspond with the notion of mnemotechnique, as an epilogue to this chapter, the author speculates on alternative itineraries for how capturing and archiving practices can be re-invented today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Online Etymology Dictionary, accessed January 10, 2015, http://www.etymonline.com

  2. 2.

    Online Etymology Dictionary, accessed January 10, 2015, http://www.etymonline.com/

  3. 3.

    As Wikileaks revealed, the National Security Agency, acting in collaboration with the United Kingdom’s M15, conveyed a program called Weeping Angel which placed the target TV in a so called “Fake Off” mode while using the internet connection, convincing the owner that the TV is off when it was actually continuously on. In “Fake Off” mode, the TV begins to operate as a bug, recording conversations in the room and sending them over the internet to a covert CIA server. Wikileaks, accessed August 21, 2017, https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/cms/page_12353643.html

  4. 4.

    Kit Smith, “Marketing: 47 Facebook Statistics for 2016,” brandwatch, May 12, 2016. https://www.brandwatch.com/blog/47-facebook-statistics-2016/

  5. 5.

    Mary Lister, “33 Mind-Blogging Instagram Stats & Facts for 2017,” The WordStream Blog, August 21, 2017. http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2017/04/20/instagram-statistics

  6. 6.

    Craig Smith, “135 Amazing Snapchat Statistics and Facts (September 2017),” DMR, October 24, 2017. https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/snapchat-statistics/#.WdX589FdLZt

  7. 7.

    Rebecca Smithers, “Terms and Conditions: Not Reading the Small Print Can Mean Big Problems,” Guardian, May 11, 2011. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2011/may/11/terms-conditions-small-print-big-problems

  8. 8.

    The full list of datasets of interest to Facebook can be found here: http://europe-v-facebook.org/EN/Data_Pool/data_pool.html. Accessed May 29, 2017.

  9. 9.

    https://labs.rs/en/. Accessed July 2, 2017.

  10. 10.

    Data according to Samuel Gibbs, “Facebook ‘tracks all visitors, breaching EU law,’” Guardian, March 31, 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/mar/31/facebook-tracks-all-visitors-breaching-eu-law-report

  11. 11.

    Natasha Singer, “Mapping, and Sharing, the Consumer Genome,” New York Times, June 16, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/17/technology/acxiom-the-quiet-giant-of-consumer-database-marketing.html?_r=0

  12. 12.

    See Smolicki (2015) for some of my early observations related to the experiment with wearing the device over an extended period of time.

  13. 13.

    From the online article “What is Post-Digital?”. http://www.aprja.net/?p=1318. Accessed January 22, 2016.

  14. 14.

    The term “post-digital” has not eluded appropriation by capitalist consumer culture; more specifically, by the design, advertising, and consulting industries. See for instance Lund (2015).

References

  • Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. 1972. The Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, Mark. 2013. The Infinite Debt of Surveillance in the Digital Economy. In Media, Surveillance and Identity. Social Perspectives, ed. André Jansson and Miyase Christensen, 91–108. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Gordon, and Jim Gemmell. 2009. Your Life, Uploaded. The Digital Way to Better Memory, Health, and Productivity. New York: A Plume Book, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogost, Ian. 2010. Ian Became a Fan of Marshall McLuhan on Facebook and Suggested You Become a Fan Too. In Facebook and Philosophy: What’s in Your Mind? ed. D.E. Wittkower, 21–32. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunton, Finn, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2015. Obfuscation. A User’s Guide for Privacy and Protest. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cascone, Kim. 2000. The Aesthetics of Failure: “Post-Digital” Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music. Computer Music Journal 24 (4): 392–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, Mark. 2012. Media Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Martin, and Rob Kitchin. 2007. Outlines of a World Coming into Existence. Pervasive Computing and the Ethics of Forgetting. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 34 (3): 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Lori. 2014. Reading Writing Interfaces. From the Digital to the Bookbound. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, Wolfgang. 2012. Digital Memory and the Archive. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flusser, Vilém. 2011. Into the Universe of Technical Images. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gower, H.D., L.S. Jast, and W.W. Topley. 1916. The Camera as Historian. London: Sampson Low, Marston and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Charles. 1995. Aristotle on the Brain. The Neuroscientist 1 (4): 245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, Sarah. 2014. Ubiquitous Photography and the Ambient Intelligent Amateur. In Auto. Self-Representation and Digital Photography, ed. Hans Hedberg, Gunilla Knape, Tyrone Martinsson, and Louise Wolthers. Stockholm: Art and Theory Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovink, Geert. 2011. Networks Without Cause. A Critique of Social Media. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludovico, Alessandro. 2012. Post-Digital Print: The Mutation of Publishing Since 1894. Eindhoven: Onomatopee Office and Project-Space.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, Cornelia. 2015. If the Future Is Software-defined, What to Do with Our Hands? Post-Digital Commons and the Unintended from a Design Perspective. In Post-Digital Culture, ed. Daniel Kulle, Cornelia Lund, Oliver Schmidt, and David Ziegenhagen. http://www.post-digital-culture.org/clund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafus, Dawn, and Jamie Sherman. 2014. This One Does Not Go Up to 11. The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. In International Journal of Communication, vol. 8, 1784–1794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier, Bruce. 2015. Data and Goliath. The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. New York and London: W.W Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolicki, Jacek. 2015. De-totalizing Capture: On Personal Recording and Archiving Practices. In ISEA 2015. Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Electronic Arts, Vancouver, Canada, August 14–19, 2015. www.isea2015.org/proceeding/submissions/ISEA2015_submission_153.pdf

  • ———. 2017. Para-archives: Rethinking Personal Archiving Practices in Capture Culture. PhD diss., Malmö University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, Bernard. 1998. Technics and Time, 1. The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Our Ailing Educational Institutions. Culture Machine, 5. http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/view/258/243

  • ———. 2010. Memory. In Critical Terms for Media Studies, ed. W.J.T. Mitchell and Mark B.N. Hansen, 64–87. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Suffocated Desire, or How the Cultural Industry Destroys the Individual: Contribution to the Theory of Mass Consumption. Parrhesia 13: 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Symbolic Misery. The Hyperindustrial Epoch. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. What Makes Life Worth Living: On Pharmacology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck, José. 2007. Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Culture of Connectivity. A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, Peter Paul. 2011. Moralizing Technology, Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank my PhD supervisors Maria Hellström Reimer and Ulrika Sjöberg from the School of Arts and Communication at Malmö University. Their generous and inspiring comments and critique helped shape this text, which draws on my recently published doctoral thesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek Smolicki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smolicki, J. (2018). You Press the Button, We Do the Rest. Personal Archiving in Capture Culture. In: Romele, A., Terrone, E. (eds) Towards a Philosophy of Digital Media. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75759-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics