Advertisement

Theorizing Lesson Study: Two Related Frameworks and Two Danish Case Studies

  • Carl Winsløw
  • Jacob Bahn
  • Klaus Rasmussen
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

Lesson study refers to certain well-established professional development practices for teachers in Japan. Over the past 30 years, the phenomenon drew the attention of scholars in other countries, and their writings have inspired several ‘movements’ of lesson study implementation. As scholars observe both successes and difficulties in these endeavors, the need arises for finer methods to characterize and monitor the processes and objects which go into what is broadly referred to as lesson study. This brief presents an overall characterization of lesson study in terms of the notion of paradidactic infrastructure, in relation to specific adaptations of two related theoretical frameworks. We argue that the use of these frameworks can help sharpen researchers’ understanding of lesson study as a phenomenon. We exemplify the use of these tools with cases from our own work on pre- and in-service teacher development in Denmark.

Keywords

Lesson study Theory of didactic situations Anthropological theory of the didactic 

References

  1. Bahn, J. (in press). An experiment with open-ended approach in grade four probability teaching. Submitted manuscript.Google Scholar
  2. Bradshaw, Z., & Hazell, A. (2017). Developing problem-solving skills in mathematics: A lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Carlsen, L. (2017). A study of the development and evolvement of mathematics student teachers’ knowledge on the implementation of CAS in the teaching of mathematics—A praxeological analysis. Poster presented at the CERME 10, Dublin, Ireland. Online Abstract Located February 27, 2017: https://keynote.conference-services.net/resources/444/5118/pdf/CERME10_0560.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2017.
  5. Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19(2), 221–266.Google Scholar
  6. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese way to improving mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, R., Gong, Z., & Han, X. (2016). Implementing mathematics teaching that promotes students’ understanding through theory-driven lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang, R., & Shimizu, Y. (2016). Improving teaching, developing teachers and teacher educators, and linking theory and practice through lesson study in mathematics: An international perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. JSME, Japan Society for Mathematics Education. (2000). Mathematics teaching in Japan. Tokyo: JSME.Google Scholar
  12. Jørgensen, E., Rostgaard, P., & Mogensen, A. (2016). Lektionsstudier i læreruddannelsens praktik—et professionelt løft? [Lesson Study in teacher education practicum—A professional enhancement?]. In B. O. Hallås & G. Grimsæth (Eds.), Lesson study i en nordisk kontekst (pp. 123–141). Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, C. (2004). Does Lesson study have a future in the United States? Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(1), 113–137.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, C. (2016). How does lesson study improve mathematics instruction? ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The case of elementary science instruction. Journal of Educational Policy, 12(5), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miyakawa, T., & Winsløw, C. (2009). Didactical designs for students’ proportional reasoning: An “open approach” lesson and a “fundamental situation”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miyakawa, T., & Winsløw, C. (2013). Developing mathematics teacher knowledge: The paradidactic infrastructure of “open lesson” in Japan. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nyboe, H., & Rasmussen, K. (2015). Lektionsstudier som praksissamarbejde [Lesson study as practice collaboration]. Unge Pædagoger, 2015(2), 30–42.Google Scholar
  19. Østergaard, K. (2016). Teori-praksis-problematikken i matematiklæreruddannelsen—belyst gennem lektionsstudier. The theory-practice relationship in teacher education—Showcased through lesson study. Ph.D. dissertation, Roskilde University, Roskilde. http://forskning.ruc.dk/site/files/57258425/Teori_praksis_problematikken_i_matematikl_reruddannelse_Kaj_stergaard_Phd_afhandling_RUC.pdf. Accessed August 28, 2017.
  20. Rasmussen, K. (2015). Lesson study in prospective mathematics teacher education: Didactic and paradidactic technology in the post-lesson reflection. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(4), 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rasmussen, K. (2016). Consecutive cycles of “whole class” lesson study: A format for development of shared teacher knowledge in preservice teacher education. Poster presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Hamburg, July 24–31, 2016. http://www.academia.edu/31060009/Consecutive_cycles_of_whole_class_Lesson_Study_-A_format_for_development_of_shared_teacher_knowledge_in_preservice_teacher_education. Accessed August 28, 2017.
  22. Stepanek, J., Appel, G., Leong, M., Mangan, M., & Mitchell, M. (2007). Leading lesson study: A practical guide for teachers and facilitators. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Takahashi, A. (2011). Response to part 1: Jumping into lesson study—Inservice mathematics teacher education. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research a practice in mathematics education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Treffers, A. (2009). Mathe-didactical reflections on young children’s understanding and application of subtraction-related principles. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1–2), 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Winsløw, C. (2011). A comparative perspective on teacher collaboration: The cases of lesson study in Japan and of multidisciplinary teaching in Denmark. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum material and teacher documentation: From textbooks to shared living resources (pp. 291–304). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science EducationUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Metropolitan University CollegeFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations