A Framework for the Performance Evaluation of an Energy Blockchain

  • Seda Yanik
  • Anil Savaş Kiliç
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 149)


In this study, we first discuss the disruption and its impacts on the power and utilities sector. We identify the drivers of the disruption and the impact it will make on the sector. Then, as one of the drivers of disruption, we examine the blockchain technology, its features, benefits and limitations. We identify a performance evaluation framework for a power and utilities blockchain, in a distributed generation setting. Finally, we evaluate the performance factors’ interrelationships on the performance of the blockchain system and investigate the importance and cause-effect groups of the factors.


  1. Aitzhan, N. Z., & Svetinovic, D. (2016). Security and privacy in decentralized energy trading through multi-signatures, blockchain and anonymous messaging streams. IEEE.Google Scholar
  2. Basden, J., & Cottrell, M. (2017, March). How utilities are using blockchain to modernize the grid. Retrieved from
  3. Carmichael, J. (2016, March). Arcade city is a blockchain-based ride-sharing uber killer. Retrieved from
  4. Chen, S. J., Hwang, C. L., & Hwang, F. P. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, Springer–Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deloitte. (2016). Blockchain applications in energy trading. Deloitte.Google Scholar
  7. Ericsson. (2014). Transforming industries: Energy and utilities. Ericsson.Google Scholar
  8. Ericsson. (2016). Shaping a new battleground in the IoT Era: Highlights from the 2016 IDC Pan–European Utilities Executive Summit. IDC Energy Insights. IDC.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2014). Definition of a research and innovation policy leveraging cloud computing and IoT combination. European Commission.Google Scholar
  10. EY. (2015a). Benchmarking European power and utility asset impairments: Testing times ahead. EYGM Limited.Google Scholar
  11. EY. (2015b). Digital disruption of utilities: Will microgrids be utility killers or saviors? EY.Google Scholar
  12. EY. (2015c). Customer plug in. EY.Google Scholar
  13. EY. (2016). The upside of disruption: Megatrends shaping 2016 and beyond. Google Scholar
  14. EY. (2017a). Future cities: Is the path to future growth through smart infrastructure? London.Google Scholar
  15. EY. (2017b). Overview of blockchain for energy and commodity trading. EY.Google Scholar
  16. Financial Times. (2016). Financial times. Retrieved from Financial Times:
  17. Frost & Sullivan. (2017, November). Visionary innovation (mega trends). Retrieved from Visionary Innovation (Mega Trends):
  18. Greenough, J. (2015). Energy companies are using the ‘Internet of Things’ to increase efficiency and save billions. Retrieved from Business Insider:
  19. Hagström, L., & Dahlquist, O. (2017). Scaling blockchain for the energy sector. MSc. Thesis, Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
  20. Hileman, G., & Rauchs, M. (2017). Global blockchain benchmarking study. Cambridge: Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance.Google Scholar
  21. Horta, J., Kofman, D., & Menga, D. (2016). Novel paradigms for advanced distribution grid energy management. Paris: Institut Mines-Télécom - membre de Télécom ParisTech.Google Scholar
  22. Institute for Electric Innovation. (2015). THOUGHT LEADERS SPEAK OUT: The evolving electric power industry. Institute for Electric Innovation.Google Scholar
  23. International Energy Agency. (2016). Energy technology perspectives 2016. International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  24. IPPR. (2014). A new approach to electricity markets: How new, disruptive technologies change everything. IPPR.Google Scholar
  25. Korn Ferry|Hay Group. (2017, November). The six global megatrends you must be prepared for. Retrieved from
  26. Laszka, A., Dubey, A., Walker, M., & Schmidt, D. (2017). Providing privacy, safety, and security in IoT-Based transactive energy systems using distributed ledgers. ACM.Google Scholar
  27. Merz, M. (2016). Potential of blockchain technology in energy trading. In D. Burgwinkel, et al. (Eds.), Blockchain technology introduction for business and IT managers. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Metering and Smart Energy International. (2016a, May 30). Residential IoT market to reach US$117.3bn in 2026. Retrieved from Metering & Smart Energy International:
  29. Metering and Smart Energy International. (2016b, September). RWE expands RE business with Belectric acquisition. Retrieved from
  30. Metering and Smart Energy International. (2016c, May). Residential IoT market to reach US$117.3bn in 2026. Retrieved from Metering & Smart Energy International:
  31. Moore, M. (2015, December). Npower launches smart home trial. Retrieved from
  32. Munsing, E., Mather, J., & Moura, S. (2017). Blockchains for decentralized optimization of energy resources in microgrid networks. eCal.Google Scholar
  33. Normandeau, K. (2016, November). Blockchain energy trading: What the future holds. Retrieved from Microgrid Knowledge:
  34. pwc. (2015). Blockchain—An opportunity for energy producers and consumers? pwc.Google Scholar
  35. pwc. (2016). Five megatrends and their implications for global defense & security. pwc.Google Scholar
  36. pwc. (2017). Use cases for blokchain in energy & commodity trading. pwc.Google Scholar
  37. Robinson, D. (2015). The scissors effect: How structural trends and government intervention are damaging major European electricity companies and affecting consumers. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
  38. Ross, T. J. (1995). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Sikorski, J. J., Haughton, J., & Kraft, M. (2017). Blockchain technology in the chemical industry: machine-to-machine electricity market. Appl Energy, 195, 234–246.Google Scholar
  40. Singh, S. (2014, May). The 10 social and tech trends that could shape the next decade. Retrieved from
  41. Trabish, H. K. (2014, May 26). Utility dive. Retrieved from Utility Dive:
  42. Ucal, I., Ugurlu, S., & Kahraman, C. (2012). Prioritization of Supply Chain Performance Measurement Factors by a Fuzzy Multicriteria Approach. In L. Benyoucef (Eds.), Multi-Criteria and Game Theory Applications Manufacturing and Logistics (pp. 161–180). Springer, London.Google Scholar
  43. United Nations. (2015). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision. United Nations.Google Scholar
  44. Utility Dive. (2016). 2016 state of the electric utility survey. Utility Dive.Google Scholar
  45. Utility Week. (2014). Utility week. Retrieved from The internet of things:
  46. Utility Week. (2016, July 22). Utility week. Retrieved from Utility Week:
  47. Vielmetter, G., & Sell, Y. (2014). Leadership 2030: The six megatrends you need to understand to lead your company into the future. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.Google Scholar
  48. Vodafone. (2016). Vodafone IoT barometer 2016. Vodafone.Google Scholar
  49. Weller, C. (2016, July). 4 mega-trends that could change the world by 2030. Retrieved from
  50. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, 8, 338–353.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istanbul Technical UniversityMackaTurkey

Personalised recommendations