Strategic Analysis of Solar Energy Pricing Process with Hesitant Fuzzy Cognitive Map

  • Veysel Çoban
  • Sezi Çevik Onar
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 149)


Sun is the leading renewable energy source for satisfying energy demand. Solar energy systems, which have direct and indirect energy generation technologies, require high initial costs and low operation costs. The right determination of solar energy price has an important role on efficient solar energy investment decisions. In this study, the critical factors for the solar energy price are defined and the causal relationships among them are represented with a Hesitant Fuzzy Cognitive Map (HFCM) model. The causal relations among the factors and the initial state values of the factors are defined with the linguistic evaluations of the experts by using Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets (HFLTSs). The linguistic expressions are converted into Trapezoid Fuzzy Membership Functions (TFMFs). The obtained HFCM model is used for simulating various scenarios, and the equilibrium state values of the factors are obtained. The results indicate that the factors affecting solar energy systems have an important effect in determining the solar energy price. The solar energy price adapts to the general energy price market in the long term.


  1. Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. BP. (2017). Statistical Review of World Energy June 2017; 66 [cited 2017 10 December]. Available from:
  3. Bloomberg New Energy Finance. (2015). New Energy Outlook  [cited 2017 10 December]. Available from:
  4. Bordogna, G., & Pasi, G. (1993). A fuzzy linguistic approach generalizing boolean information retrieval: A model and its evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(2), 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bueno, S., & Salmeron, J. L. (2009). Benchmarking main activation functions in fuzzy cognitive maps. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5221–5229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Çoban, V., & Onar, S. Ç. (2017). Modelling solar energy usage with fuzzy cognitive maps. In Intelligence Systems in Environmental Management: Theory and Applications (pp. 159–187). Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Conkling, R. L. (2011). Energy pricing: Economics and principles. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawley, G. M. (2016). Solar energy. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co., Pte. Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delgado, M., et al. (1998). Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making. Information Sciences, 107(1–4), 177–194.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Filev, D., & Yager, R. R. (1998). On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 94(2), 157–169.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2016). Trends 2016 in Photovoltaic Applications [cited 2017 22 December]. Available from:
  12. Jaimol, T., Ashok, S., & Jose, T. (2011). Hybrid pricing strategy for solar energy. Proc. Sustainable Energy and Intelligent Systems (SEISCON), Chennai, July 2011, pp. 121–125.Google Scholar
  13. Kahraman, C., Kaymak, U., & Yazici, A. (2016). Fuzzy logic in its 50th year: New developments, directions and challenges (Vol. 341). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24(1), 65–75.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Kosko, B. (1997). Fuzzy engineering. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, H., & Rodríguez, R. M. (2014). A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making. Information Sciences, 258, 220–238.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. MDAI. (2014). M.D.f.A.I. A few aggregation operators 2014. Available from:
  18. Michael, G. (2010). Fuzzy cognitive maps: Advances in theory, methodologies, tools and applications. Studies in fuzzines and soft computing (Vol. 10, pp. 978–3). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Ministry. (2017). E.a.N.R Renewable Energy Resources Support Mechanism (YEKDEM) [cited 2017 20 November]. Available from:
  20. Mir-Artigues, P., & Del Río, P. (2016). The Economics and Policy of Solar Photovoltaic Generation. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mizumoto, M., & Tanaka, K. (1976). Some properties of fuzzy sets of type 2. Information and Control, 31(4), 312–340.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Papageorgiou, E. I. (2013). Fuzzy cognitive maps for applied sciences and engineering: from fundamentals to extensions and learning algorithms (Vol. 54). Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  23. PV-Magazine. (2017). Turkey adds 553 MW of solar in H1 2017. [cited 2017 10 November]. Available from:
  24. Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20(1), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruspini, E. H. (1969). A new approach to clustering. Information and Control, 15(1), 22–32.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Scientists. (2015). U.o.C Increase Renewable Energy [cited 2017 10 November]. Available from:
  27. Stern, N. (2015). Why are we waiting? The logic, urgency, and promise of tackling climate change. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.Google Scholar
  28. The National Academies of Sciences, E., and Medicine. (2009). G8+5 Academies’ joint statement: Climate change and the transformation of energy  technologies for a low carbon future [cited 2017 12 December]. Available from:
  29. Timilsina, G. R., Kurdgelashvili, L., & Narbel, P. A. (2012). Solar energy: Markets, economics and policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6), 529–539.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. World Energy Council. (2016) World Energy Resources  [cited 2017 10 December]. Available from:  
  32. Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(1), 183–190.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Yager, R. R. (1993). Aggregating fuzzy sets represented by belief structures. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 1(3), 215–224.Google Scholar
  34. Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Zadeh, L. A. (1996). Fuzzy sets, in fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: Selected papers by Lotfi A Zadeh (pp. 394–432). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  36. Zatzman, G. M. (2012). Sustainable energy pricing: Nature, sustainable engineering, and the science of energy pricing. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial Engineering DepartmentIstanbul Technical UniversityMaçka, İstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations