Design and Analysis of Composite Oil Pan for Automotive Vehicle

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The reduction of the carbon-dioxide emission of the vehicles is one of the main objectives in the research and development divisions of the automotive industry. The environmental pollution issues are still very actual that is why more regulations and standards are introduced to reduce the adverse effects on the environment. Thus, the new rules are adopted in the automotive manufacturing by the European Union and many car manufacturers are involved in developments aimed at the accomplishment of the significant weight reductions in vehicles.

One of the solutions lies in the replacement of the material of the components. Modern composite materials can be competitive with metals; their properties can be even higher than for steels. The paper presents the process of substitution of the metal oil pan into the composite one. Design modification of the oil pan and overview of the molding injection simulations is discussed. The effects of cooling channel design on the warpage of the component are analyzed. Finite element simulation of the injection molded part is also performed where the microstructure of the composite is considered. Different levels of homogenization of anisotropic material properties are applied in simulations to demonstrate the importance of the accurate prediction of the fiber orientation. Finally, the results of the weight reduction arise from the metal replacement is presented.

Keywords

Oil pan Injection molding Simulation Finite element method Mori-Tanaka homogenization 

References

  1. 1.
    Climate action: Reducing carbon-dioxide emissions from passengers cars. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/cars_en. Last accessed 20 Nov 2017
  2. 2.
    Jalics, K., Priebsch, H.-H., Brandl, F., Andres, O., Fingerhut, H.-P.: Engine noise reduction potential applying high damping materials for component design. Aachen Acoustic Colloquium, Aachen (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elmarakbi, A.: Advanced Composite Materials for Automotive Applications. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friedrich, K., Almajid, A.A.: Manufacturing aspects of advanced polymer composites for automotive applications. Appl. Compos. Mater. 20, 107–128 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chou, T.W., McCullough, R.L., Pipes, R.B.: Composites. Sci. Am. 254, 193–203 (1986)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    VanGelder, K.: Fundamentals of Automotive Technology. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The difference between short block and long block. http://automotivecars-info.blogspot.hu/2011/08/learn-short-block-and-long-block.html. Last accessed 29 Oct 2017
  8. 8.
    Mechanical properties of Zytel® 70G35HSLRA4 BK267 composite material. http://www.campusplastics.com/campus/de/datasheet/Zytel%C2%AE+70G35HSLRA4+BK267/DuPont+Engineering+Polymers/52/809327f4. Last accessed 1 Dec 2017
  9. 9.
    C04-001 Part design Guideline. CoreTech System Co., Ltd. Moldex3D (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Csutorka, L.: Összecsapási vonalak kialakítása a fröccsöntésnél, Műanyagipari Szemle (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, E.: How Injection Molding Simulation Helps Reduce Warp Issues (Webinar). CoreTech System Co., Ltd. (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MiskolcMiskolc-EgyetemvárosHungary
  2. 2.Bay Zoltán Nonprofit Ltd. for Applied ResearchMiskolcHungary

Personalised recommendations