Advertisement

Gendered Division of Household Labour

  • Hyun-Joo Lim
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life book series (PSFL)

Abstract

As a social construct, ‘gender is a powerful ideological device, which produces, reproduces, and legitimates the choices and limits that are predicated on sex categories’ (West and Zimmerman 1987, p. 147).

References

  1. Aassve, A., G. Fuochi, and M. Letizia. 2014. Desperate housework: Relative resources, time availability, economic dependency, and gender ideology across Europe. Journal of Family Issues 35 (8): 1000–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almqvist, A.-L., and A.-Z. Duvander. 2014. Changes in gender equality? Swedish fathers’ parental leave, division of childcare and housework. Journal of Family Studies 20 (1): 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altintas, E., and O. Sullivan. 2016. Fifty years of change updated: Cross-national gender convergence in housework. Demographic Research 35 (16): 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrighi, B.A., and D.J.J. Maume. 2000. Workplace subordination and men’s avoidance of housework. Journal of Family Issues 21 (4): 464–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baxter, J. 2000. The joys and justice of housework. Sociology 34 (4): 609–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baxter, J., and M. Western. 1998. Satisfaction with housework: Examining the paradox. Sociology 32 (1): 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baxter, J., B. Hewitt, and M. Haynes. 2004. Transitions through the lifecourse and time spent on housework. The 99th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  8. Bianchi, S.M., M.A. Milkie, L.C. Sayer, and J.P. Robinson. 2000. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces 79 (1): 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biernat, M., and C.B. Wortman. 1991. Sharing of home responsibilities between professionally employed women and their husbands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (6): 844–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carby, H. 1987. Reconstructing womanhood: The emergence of the Afro-American woman novelist. Oxford: New York.Google Scholar
  11. Carlson, D.L., and J.L. Lynch. 2013. Housework: Cause and consequence of gender ideology? Social Science Research 42: 1505–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan, A.H.-N. 2006. The effects of full-time domestic workers on married women’s economic activity status in Hong Kong, 1981–2001. International Sociology 21 (1): 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan, A.K.-W. 2012. Doing family, contesting gender and expanding affinity: Family practices of married women in Hong Kong. Families, Relationships and Societies 1 (1): 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang, K.-S. 2010. South Korea under compressed modernity: Familial political economy in transition. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Coltrane, S. 1989. Household labor and the routine production of gender. Social Problems 36 (5): 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coltrane, S. 2000. Research on household labor: Modelling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62 (4): 1208–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Connell, R.W. 1987. Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Connell, R.W. 2005. Masculinities, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Connolly, S., and M. Gregory. 2009. The part-time pay penalty: Earnings trajectories for British women. Oxford Economic Papers 61: i76–i97.Google Scholar
  20. Deutsch, F.M., and S.E. Saxon. 1998. The double standard of praise and criticism for mothers and fathers. Psychology of Women Quarterly 22: 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, S.L., and S. Bowlby. 2000. Crossing boundaries: Racialised gendering and the labour market experiences of Pakistani migrant women in Britain. Women’s Studies International Forum 23 (4): 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuwa, M. 2003. Macro-level inequality and the household division of labour: A cross-national study. The Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  23. Fuwa, M. 2004. Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labour in 22 countries. American Sociological Review 69 (6): 751–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gregory, A., and S. Milner. 2008. Fatherhood regimes and father involvement in France and the UK. Community, Work & Family 11 (1): 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hays, S. 1996. The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hill Collins, P. 1990. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Ho, D.Y.F. 1987. Fatherhood in Chinese culture. In The father’s role: Cross-cultural perspectives, ed. M.E. Lamb, 227–245. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Ho, D.Y.F. 1994. Cognitive socialisation in Confucian heritage cultures. In Cross-cultural roots of minority child development, ed. P. Greenfield and R. Cocking, 285–313. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Ho, C. 2006. Migration as feminisation? Chinese women’s experiences of work and family in Australia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32 (3): 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hochschild, A.R., and A. Machung. 1989. The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home, 1990. London: Piatkus.Google Scholar
  31. Hsu, P.-C. 2008. Gender inequality and the division of household labor: Comparisonsamong China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. PhD diss., Cornell University.Google Scholar
  32. Ishii-Kuntz, M., and S. Coltrane. 1992. Predicting the sharing of household labor: Are parenting and housework distinct? Pacific Sociological Association 35 (4): 629–647.Google Scholar
  33. Ishii-Kuntz, M., K. Makino, K. Kato, and M. Tsuchiya. 2004. Japanese fathers of preschoolers and their involvement in child care. Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 779–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Iwai, N. 2017. Division of housework in Japan, South Korea, China and Taiwan. In Family, work and wellbeing in Asia, eds. M -C. Tsai and W -C. Chen, 107–127. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.Google Scholar
  35. Jackson, S., J. Liu, and J. Woo. 2008. East Asian sexualities: Modernity, gender & new sexual cultures. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  36. Johnston, D.D., and H.D. Swanson. 2006. Constructing the “good mother”: The experience of mothering ideologies by work status. Sex Roles 54: 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kan, M.Y. 2008. Does gender trump money? Housework hours of husbands and wives in Britain. Work, Employment & Society 22 (1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kan, M.Y. 2012. Revising the ‘doing gender’ hypothesis—Housework hours of husbands and wives. Understanding Society: Findings 7–8. Available from: http://research.understandingsociety.org.uk/findings/findings-2012. Accessed 10 July 2012.
  39. Kan, M.-Y., and E. Hertog. 2017. Domestic division of labour and fertility preference in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Demographic Research 36 (18): 555–588.Google Scholar
  40. Kim, H.-K. 2009. Analysing the gender division of labor: The cases of the United States and South Korea. Asian Perspective 33 (2): 181–229.Google Scholar
  41. Kitterod, R.H., and S.V. Pettersen. 2006. Making up for mothers’ employed working hours? Housework and childcare among Norwegian fathers. Work, Employment & Society 20 (3): 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Komarovsky, M. 2004. The unemployed man and his family: The effect of unemployment upon the status of the man in fifty-nine families. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lee, W.K.M. 2002. Gender ideology and the domestic division of labour in middle-class Chinese families in Hong Kong. Gender, Place and Culture 9 (3): 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee, J.G.S. 2005. A narrative analysis of the labour market experiences of Korean migrant women in Australia. Camperdown, NSW: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  45. Lee, S.H., and E.J. Han. 1998. A study on paternal role-behaviour of married men. Journal of the Korean Home Management Association 16: 49–62.Google Scholar
  46. Lee, M., A. Chan, H. Bradby, and G. Green. 2002. Chinese migrant women and families in Britain. Women’s Studies International Forum 25 (6): 607–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Legerski, E.M. 2007. Why unemployed men won’t pick up the slack: The effects of job loss on household division of labor and carework. The Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Meeting, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Leonard, M. 2001. Old wine in new bottles? Women working inside and outside the household. Women’s Studies International Forum 24 (1): 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lim, I.-S. 1997. Korean immigrant women’s challenge to gender inequality at home: The interplay of economic resources, gender and family. Gender and Society 11 (1): 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mannino, C.A., and F.M. Deutsch. 2007. Changing the division of household labor: A negotiated process between partners. Sex Roles 56: 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller, A.J., and D.L. Carlson. 2016. Great expectations? Working- and middle-class cohabitors’ expected and actual divisions of housework. Journal of Marriage and Family 78 (2): 346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mizukoshi, K., F. Kohlbacher, and C. Schimkowsky. 2016. Japan’s ikumen discourse: Macro and micro perspectives on modern fatherhood. Japan Forum 28 (2): 212–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nitsche, N., and D. Grunow. 2016. Housework over the course of relationships: Gender ideology, resources, and the division of housework from a growth curve perspective. Advances in Life Course Research 29: 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pascall, G., and S. Sung. 2007. Gender and East Asian welfare state: From Confucianism to gender equality? Fourth Annual East Asian Social Policy Research Network International Conference.Google Scholar
  55. Poortman, A.-R., and T. van der Lippe. 2009. Attitudes toward housework and child care and the gendered division of labor. Journal of Marriage and Family 71 (3): 526–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pyke, K., and T. Dang. 2003. “FOB” and “whitewashed”: Identity and internalised racism among second generation Asian Americans. Qualitative Sociology 26 (2): 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pyke, K.D., and D.L. Johnson. 2003. Asian American women and racialised femininities “doing” gender across cultural worlds. Gender and Society 17 (1): 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Qian, Y., and L.C. Sayer. 2016. Division of labor, gender ideology, and marital satisfaction in East Asia. Journal of Marriage and Family 78 (2): 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Riggs, J.M. 1997. Mandates for mothers and fathers: Perceptions of breadwinners and care givers. Sex Roles 37 (7/8): 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Riggs, J.M. 1998. Social roles we choose and don’t choose: Impressions of employed and unemployed parents. Sex Roles 39 (5/6): 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Riggs, J.M. 2005. Impressions of mothers and fathers on the periphery if child care. Psychology of Women Quarterly 29: 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rofel, L. 1999. Other modernities: Gendered yearnings in China after socialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ruppanner, L.E. 2010. Cross-national reports of housework: An investigation of the gender empowerment measure. Social Science Research 39: 963–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ruppanner, L., and J. Treas. 2015. Working weekends: Changing European time regimes and gender inequality in household labour. Journal of Family Issues 36 (3): 1782–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rush, M. 2015. Theorising fatherhood, welfare and the decline of patriarchy in Japan. International Review of Sociology 25 (3): 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  67. Sanchez, L. 1994. Material resources, family structure resources, and husbands’ housework participation: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Family Issues 15 (3): 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schober, P.S. 2013. Maternal labor market return and domestic work after childbirth in Britain and Germany. Community, Work & Family 16 (3): 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shwalb, D.W., J. Nakazawa, T. Yamamoto, and J.-H. Hyun. 2004. Fathering in Japanese, Chinese and Korean culture: A review of the research literature. In The role of the father in child development, ed. M.E. Lamb, 146–181. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Steinberg, S., L. Kruckman, and S. Steinberg. 2000. Reinventing fatherhood in Japan and Canada. Social Science and Medicine 50: 1257–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sung, S. 2003. Women reconciling paid and unpaid work in a Confucian welfare state: The case of South Korea. Social Policy and Administration 37 (4): 342–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tanaka, S., and J. Waldfogel. 2007. Effects of parental leave and work hours on fathers’ involvement with their babies. Community, Work & Family 10 (4): 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. van der Lippe, T., J. de Ruijter, E. de Ruijter, and W. Raub. 2011. Persistent inequalities in time use between men and women: A detailed look at the influence of economic circumstances, policies, and culture. European Sociological Review 27 (2): 164–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. van Hooff, J.H. 2011. Rationalising inequality: Heterosexual couples’ explanations and justifications for the division of housework along traditionally gendered lines. Journal of Gender Studies 20 (1): 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Viala, E.S. 2011. Contemporary family life: A joint venture with contradictions. Nodic Psychology 63 (2): 68–87.Google Scholar
  76. West, C., and D.H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1 (2): 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yoon, S.Y., and O.B. Chung. 1999. The relations between fathering practices and children’s social adjustment. Korean Journal of Child Studies 20: 101–122.Google Scholar
  78. Yuen-Tsang, A.W.K. 1997. Towards a Chinese conception of social support: A study on the social support network of Chinese working mothers in Beijing. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health & Social SciencesBournemouth UniversityBournemouthUK

Personalised recommendations