Advertisement

Estimating the Membership Function of the Fuzzy Willingness-to-Pay/Accept for Health via Bayesian Modelling

  • Michał Jakubczyk
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 361)

Abstract

Determining how to trade off individual criteria is often not obvious, especially when attributes of very different nature are juxtaposed, e.g. health and money. The difficulty stems both from the lack of adequate market experience and strong ethical component when valuing some goods, resulting in inherently imprecise preferences. Fuzzy sets can be used to model willingness-to-pay/accept (WTP/WTA), so as to quantify this imprecision and support the decision making process. The preferences need then to be estimated based on available data. In the paper, I show how to estimate the membership function of fuzzy WTP/WTA, when decision makers’ preferences are collected via survey with Likert-based questions. I apply the proposed methodology to a data set on WTP/WTA for health. The mathematical model contains two elements: the parametric representation of the membership function and the mathematical model how it is translated into Likert options. The model parameters are estimated in a Bayesian approach using Markov-chain Monte Carlo. The results suggest a slight WTP-WTA disparity and WTA being more fuzzy as WTP. The model is fragile to single respondents with lexicographic preferences, i.e. not willing to accept any trade-offs between health and money.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was done during my stay at The Tippie College of Business, The University of Iowa, USA, thanks to the Fulbright Senior Award. This opportunity is greatly appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Bleichrodt, P. Wakker, M. Johannesson, Characterizing QALYs by risk neutrality. J. Risk Uncertain. 15, 107–114 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Golicki, M. Jakubczyk, M. Niewada, W. Wrona, J. Busschbach, Valuation of EQ-5D Health states in Poland: First TTO-based social value set in Central and Eastern Europe. Value Health 13, 289–297 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Brooks, F. De Charro, EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37, 53–72 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Bellavance, G. Dionne, M. Lebeau, The value of a statistical life: a meta-analysis with a mixed effects regression model. J. Health Econom. 28(2), 444–464 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Viscusi, J. Aldy, The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J. Risk Uncertain. 27(1), 5–76 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Hultkrantz, M. Svensson, The value of a statistical life in Sweden: a review of the empirical literature. Health Policy 108(2–3), 302–310 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Dubourg, M. Jones-Lee, G. Loomes, Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity. J. Risk Uncertain. 9, 115–133 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Horowitz, K. McConnell, A review of WTP/WTA studies. J. Environment. Econom. Manag. 44, 426–447 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Tunçel, J. Hammitt, A new meta-analysis on the WTP/WTA disparity. J. Environment. Econom. Manag. 68, 175–187 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Smithson, Fuzzy Set Analysis for Behavioral and Social Sciences. Springer (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Jakubczyk, B. Kamiński, Fuzzy approach to decision analysis with multiple criteria and uncertainty in health technology assessment, Ann. Operat. Res. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1910-9
  12. 12.
    M. Jakubczyk, Using a fuzzy approach in multi-criteria decision making with multiple alternatives in health care. Multiple Criter. Decision Mak. 10, 65–81 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Jakubczyk, Choosing from multiple alternatives in cost-effectiveness analysis with fuzzy willingness-to-pay/accept and uncertainty, mimeo (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Klir, T. Folger, Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information. Prentice-Hall (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Decision Analysis and Support UnitSGH Warsaw School of EconomicsWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations