Skip to main content

Magnetism, Magnons, and Magnetic Resonance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Solid-State Physics

Abstract

The first chapter was devoted to the solid-state medium (i.e. its crystal structure and binding). The next two chapters concerned the two most important types of energy excitations in a solid (the electronic excitations and the phonons). Magnons are another important type of energy excitation and they occur in magnetically ordered solids. However, it is not possible to discuss magnons without laying some groundwork for them by discussing the more elementary parts of magnetic phenomena. Also, there are many magnetic properties that cannot be discussed by using the concept of magnons. In fact, the study of magnetism is probably the first solid-state property that was seriously studied, relating as it does to lodestone and compass needles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that \( \mu_{B} \) has absorbed the ℏ so MS and S are either integers or half-integers. Also note (7.11) is invariant to a change of the dummy summation variable from MS to −MS.

  2. 2.

    A temperature-independent contribution known as van Vleck paramagnetism may also be important for some materials at low temperature. It may occur due to the effect of excited states that can be treated by second-order perturbation theory. It is commonly important when first-order terms vanish. See Ashcroft and Mermin [7.2, p. 653].

  3. 3.

    The Langevin function is the classical limit of (7.16).

  4. 4.

    Perhaps the best simple discussion of the Weiss and related theories is contained in the book by J. S. Smart [92], which can be consulted for further details. By using two sublattices, it is possible to give a similar (to that below) description of antiferromagnetism. See Sect. 7.1.3.

  5. 5.

    Here e can be treated as |e| and so as usual, \( \mu_{B} = \left| e \right|{\hbar / {2m}} \).

  6. 6.

    See also, e.g., Kittel [7.39, p. 458ff].

  7. 7.

    2C1μ0 = C of (7.27).

  8. 8.

    For a discussion of this point see the article by Keffer [7.37].

  9. 9.

    See, for example, Anderson [7.1].

  10. 10.

    See [7.10].

  11. 11.

    See Wojtowicz [7.70].

  12. 12.

    See Patterson [7.53, p. 176ff].

  13. 13.

    Kittel [60, pp. 360–366] and White [7.68, pp. 197–200].

  14. 14.

    See Langer and Vosko [7.42].

  15. 15.

    The minus sign comes from the negative charge on the electron.

  16. 16.

    See, for example, [7.38].

  17. 17.

    At least for high magnetic fields; see Dyson [7.18].

  18. 18.

    A good reference for the material in this chapter on spin waves is an article by Kittel [7.38]

  19. 19.

    Damon and Eshbach [7.17].

  20. 20.

    R. Damon and J. Eshbach, J Phys. Chem. Solids, 19, 308 (1961).

  21. 21.

    (χ = −1 yields the bulk modes with ω = γ′[H 0 z (H 0 z  + M)]1/2 for no boundaries—magnetic material everywhere—and γ′[H 0 z (H 0 z  − M)]1/2 for the plate perpendicular to the z direction).

  22. 22.

    See Kadanoff et al. [7.35].

  23. 23.

    See Patterson et al. [7.54] and references cited therein.

  24. 24.

    L. P. Kadanoff et al., Reviews of Modern Physics, 39 (2), 395 (1967).

  25. 25.

    H. Callen and T. Welton, Phys. Rev. 83, 34 (1951).

  26. 26.

    See Huang [7.32, p. 441ff]. For clarity, perhaps we should also remind the reader of some definitions.

    1. Phase Transition. This can involve a change of structure, magnetization (e.g. from zero to a finite value), or a vanishing of electrical resistivity with changes of temperature or pressure or other relevant state variables. By the Ehrenfest criterion, phase transitions are of the nth order if the (n − 1)st order derivatives of the Gibbs free energy are continuous without the nth order derivatives being continuous. For example, for a typical first order fluid system where a liquid boils, this leads to a latent heat. A typical magnetic second order transition as T is varied with the magnetic field zero has continuous first order derivatives and the magnetization continuously rises from zero at the transition point, which in this case is also a critical point. It is helpful to look at phase diagrams when discussing these matters.

    2. Critical Point. A critical point is a definite temperature, pressure, and density of a fluid (or other state variable, e.g., for a magnetic system, one uses temperature, magnetic field, and magnetization) at which a phase transition happens without a discontinuous change in these state variables.

    In addition, there are new terms that have appeared such as multicritical point. One example of a multicritical point is a tricritical point where three second order lines meet at a first order line.

    3. Quantum Phase Transitions (A). A quantum phase transition is one that occurs at absolute zero. Classical phase transitions occur because of thermal fluctuations, whereas quantum phase transitions happen due to quantum fluctuations as required by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Suppose ω is a characteristic frequency of a quantum oscillation, then if \( \hbar\omega \) is less than kT, classical phase transitions can happen in appropriate systems. The effects of quantum critical behavior will only be seen if the inequality goes the other way around. If one is very near absolute zero then as an external parameter (such as chemical composition, pressure, or magnetic field) is varied, some systems will show quantum critical behavior as one moves through the quantum critical point. Quantum criticality was first seen in some ferroelectrics. Other examples include Cobalt niobate and considerable discussion is given in the reference:

    Subir Sachdev and Bernhard Keimer, “Quantum criticality,” Physics Today, pp. 29–35, Feb. 2011.

  27. 27.

    See Weinberg [7.67]. A fun introduction to spontaneously broken symmetry, renormalization (p. 665), renormalization group (p. 415), order parameters (p. 416), and much, much more can be found in Kerson Huang, Fundamental Forces of Nature, The Story of Gauge Fields, World Scientific, New Jersey, 2007.

  28. 28.

    More Details Can Be Found in Morrish [68] and Chikazumi [7.11].

  29. 29.

    An alternative derivation is based on writing \( U\propto\sum\mu_{i}B_{i} \), where μi is the magnetic moment \( \propto \) Si and Bi is the effective exchange field \( \propto\sum\nolimits_{j}(\text{nn}) \) JijSj, treating the Sj in a continuum spatial approximation and expanding Sj in a Taylor series (Sj = Si + aSi /∂x + etc. to 2nd order). See (7.375) and following.

  30. 30.

    Some authors define Hc as the field that reduces M to zero.

  31. 31.

    See Manenkov and Orbach (eds) [7.45].

  32. 32.

    See Waller [7.66]. Discussion of ways to calculate T1 and T2 is contained in White [7.68, pp. 124ff and 135ff].

  33. 33.

    For a complete discussion of the many types of relaxation that are possible and for comments on when these processes are important, see A. A. Manenkov and R. Orbach, Editors, Spin-Lattice Relaxation in Ionic Solids, Harper and Row Publishers, New York, 1966.

  34. 34.

    Elements in the same class are conjugate to each other that means if g1 and g2 are in the same class there exists a \( g \in G \ni g_{1}=g^{-1}g_{2}g \).

  35. 35.

    See Mathews and Walker [7.47].

  36. 36.

    A comprehensive review has recently appeared, Zutic et al. [7.73]. Comment: Our discussion in this section is of course too brief and highly simplified. In particular, our discussion of GMR has ignored spin dependent scattering processes at the Ferro-nonmagnetized metal interfaces. These are typically very important. Our discussion is perhaps most apropos for GMR in so-called half-metals (one spin band metallic, one insulating). This is clearly discussed in “The Discovery of Giant Magnetoresistance” issued by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences on 9 Oct. 2007. It can be readily found on the internet. They also discuss tunneling magnetoresistance and give many references. By now, entire books have been written on spintronics and it is a field with huge technical.

  37. 37.

    See Fetter and Walecka [7.20] and Steiner, “Linear and non linear modes in 1d magnets,” in [7.14, p. 199ff].

  38. 38.

    See the article by Krumhansl in [7.8, pp. 3–21] who notes that static solutions are also solitons.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James D. Patterson .

Problems

Problems

  1. 7.1

    Calculate the demagnetization factor of a sphere.

  2. 7.2

    In the mean-field approximation in dimensionless units for spin 1/2 ferro- magnets the magnetization (m) is given by

    $$ m = \tanh \left( {\frac{m}{t}} \right), $$

    where t = T/Tc and Tc is the Curie temperature. Show that just below the Curie temperature t < 1,

    $$ m = \sqrt 3 \sqrt {1 - t} . $$
  3. 7.3

    Evaluate the angular momentum L and magnetic moment \( \mu \) for a sphere of mass M (mass uniformly distributed through the volume) and charge Q (uniformly distributed over the surface), assuming a radius r and an angular velocity \( \omega \). Thereby, obtain the ratio of magnetic moment to angular momentum.

  4. 7.4

    Derive Curie’s law directly from a high-temperature expansion of the partition function. For paramagnets, Curie’s law is

    $$ \chi = \frac{C}{T}\quad\left( {\text{The magnetic susceptibility}} \right), $$

    where Curie’s constant is

    $$ C = \frac{{\mu_{0} Ng^{2} \mu_{B}^{2} j\left( {j + 1} \right)}}{3k}. $$

    N is the number of moments per unit volume, g is Lande’s g factor, \( \mu_{B} \) is the Bohr magneton, and j is the angular momentum quantum number.

  5. 7.5

    Prove (7.175).

  6. 7.6

    Prove (7.176).

  7. 7.7

    In one spatial dimension suppose one assumes the Heisenberg Hamiltonian

    $$ \mathcal{H} = - \frac{1}{2}\sum \limits_{{R,R^{\prime}}} J\left( {R - R^{\prime}} \right) \varvec{S}_{R} \cdot \varvec{S}_{{R^{\prime}}} ,\quad J\left( 0 \right) = 0, $$

    where R − R′ = ±a for nearest neighbor and J1 ≡ Ja) > 0, J2 ≡ J(±2a) = J1/2 with the rest of the couplings being zero. Show that the stable ground state is helical and find the turn angle. Assume classical spins. For simplicity, assume the spins are confined to the (x, y)-plane.

  8. 7.8

    Show in an antiferromagnetic spin wave that the neighboring spins precess in the same direction and with the same angular velocity but have different amplitudes and phases. Assume a one-dimensional array of spins with nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic coupling and treat the spins classically.

  9. 7.9

    Show that (7.183) is a consistent transformation in the sense that it obeys a relation like (7.195), but for \( {\text{S}}_{j}^{ - } \).

  10. 7.10

    Show that (7.158) can be written as

    $$ \mathcal{H} = - J\sum \limits_{j\delta } \left[ {S_{jz} S_{j + \delta ,z} +\frac{1}{2}\left( {S_{j}^{ - } S_{j + \delta }^{ + } +S_{j}^{ + } S_{j + \delta }^{ + } } \right)} \right] - 2\mu_{0} \mu H\sum \limits_{j} S_{jz} . $$
  11. 7.11

    Using the definitions (7.199), show that

    $$ \begin{array}{*{20}c} {\left[ {b_{\varvec{k}} ,b_{{\varvec{k}^{\prime}}}^{\dag } } \right]} & = & {\delta_{k}^{{k^{\prime}}} ,} \\ {\left[ {b_{\varvec{k}} ,b_{{\varvec{k}^{\prime}}} } \right]} & = & {0,} \\ {\left[ {b_{\varvec{k}}^{\dag } ,b_{{\varvec{k}^{\prime}}}^{\dag } } \right]} & = & {0.} \\ \end{array} $$
  12. 7.12
    1. (a)

      Apply Hund’s rules to find the ground state of Nd3+ (4f35s2p6).

    2. (b)

      Calculate the Lande g-factor for this case.

  13. 7.13

    By use of Hund’s rules, show that the ground state of Ce3+ is 2F5/2, of Pm3+ is 5I4, and of Eu3+ is 7F0.

  14. 7.14

    Explain what the phrases “3d1 configuration” and “2D term” mean.

  15. 7.15

    Give a rough order of magnitude estimate of the magnetic coupling energy of two magnetic ions in EuO \( (T_{c}\cong 69\,\text{K}) \). How large an external magnetic field would have to be applied so that the magnetic coupling energy of a single ion to the external field would be comparable to the exchange coupling energy (the effective magnetic moment of the magnetic Eu2+ ions is 7.94 Bohr magnetons)?

  16. 7.16

    Estimate the Curie temperature of EuO if the molecular field were caused by magnetic dipole interactions rather than by exchange interactions.

  17. 7.17

    Prove the Bohr–van Leeuwen theorem that shows the absence of magnetism with purely classical statistics. Hint—look at Chap. 4 of Van Vleck [7.63].

  18. 7.18

    Describe how iron magnetizes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Patterson, J.D., Bailey, B.C. (2018). Magnetism, Magnons, and Magnetic Resonance. In: Solid-State Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75322-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics