Advertisement

Becoming and Belonging: Negotiating Non-heteronormative Identities Online and at School

  • Peter BanselEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reveals that belonging is an ongoing temporal project accomplished and enacted in multiple and shifting locations. Drawing on qualitative data, it reveals the material practices through which young people of diverse genders, sexualities and sexes produce and perform the ‘truth of themselves’. It shows they find spaces of belonging through digital social media and classroom pedagogies, along with everyday social practices through which possibilities for belonging are opened or foreclosed. It captures the desire and ‘longing to belong’ of queer young people, their search for the ‘truth of one’s self’ and the points of tension produced in the heteronormative practices of schooling and the multiple possible truths and selves produced in young people’s engagement with digital social media.

Keywords

Queer Gender Sexualities Digital social media Heteronormative 

References

  1. Aerts, S., Van Houtte, M., Dewaele, A., Cox, N., & Vincke, J. (2012). Sense of belonging in secondary school: A survey of LGB and heterosexual students in Flanders. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(1), 90–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2012a). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, S. (2012b). Whiteness and the general will: Diversity work as willful work. Philosophia, 2(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  4. Anthias, F. (2006). Belongings in a globalizing and unequal world: Rethinking translocations. In N. Yuval-Davis, K. Kannabiran, & U. Vieten (Eds.), The situated politics of belonging (pp. 17–32). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Barad, K. (2012). Intra-active entanglements – An interview with Karen Barad, by M. Juelskjaer & N. Schwennesen. KVINDER FKON & FORSKING NR, 1(2), 10–24.Google Scholar
  6. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birkett, M., Espelage, D. L., & Koenig, B. (2009). LGB and questioning students in schools: The moderating effects of homophobic bullying and school climate on negative outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(7), 989–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boler, M. (2007). Hypes, hopes and actualities: New digital Cartesianism and bodies in cyberspace. New Media & Society, 9(1), 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buckingham, D. (2008). Youth, identity and digital media. In The J D and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Dean, J. (2013). Whatever blogging. In T. Scholz (Ed.), Digital labour: The internet as playground and factory (pp. 127–146). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Education and Training. (2012). https://docs.education.gov.au/documents/2012-appendix-2-equity-groups.
  15. Diprose, R. (2008). Where your people from girl?: Belonging to race, gender, and place beneath clouds. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 19(3), 28–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Facebook. (2013, February 13). Facebook diversity. Retrieved January 27, 2015, from https://www.facebook.com/facebookdiversity.
  17. Fisher, E. (2012). How less alienation creates more exploitation? Audience labour on social network sites. Triple C-Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 10, 171–183.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1992). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality: 2. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2002). Student success and failure: As a matter of fact or just how they are portrayed? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garbutt, R. (2009). Social inclusion and local practices of belonging. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal, 1(3), 84–108.Google Scholar
  21. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Griffin, P. (2007). Sexing the economy in a neo-liberal world order: Neo-liberal discourse and the (re)production of heteronormative heterosexuality. Political Studies Association BJPIR, 9(2), 220–238.Google Scholar
  25. Hillier, L., Jones, T., Monagle, M., Overton, N., Gahan, L., Blackman, J., & Mitchell, A. (2010). Writing themselves in 3 (WTi3): The third national study on the sexual health and wellbeing of same sex attracted and gender questioning young people. Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  26. Ingraham, C. (2005). Introduction: Thinking straight. In C. Ingraham (Ed.), Thinking straight: The power, the promise, and the paradox of heterosexuality (pp. 1–14). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Kosciw, J. G., Greytak, E. A., Diaz, E. M., & Barkiewicz, M. J. (2010). The 2009 national school climate survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York: GLSEN.Google Scholar
  28. Kosciw, J. G., Palmer, N. A., Kull, R. M., & Greytak, E. A. (2013). The effect of negative school climate on academic outcomes for LGBT youth and the role of in-school supports. Journal of School Violence, 12(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LeMaster, B. (2015). Discontents of being and becoming fabulous on RuPaul’s Drag U: Queer criticism in neoliberal times. Women’s Studies in Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2014.988776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Probyn, E. (1996). Outside belongings. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robinson, K., & Davies, C. (2008). Docile bodies and heteronormative moral subjects: Constructing the child and sexual knowledge in schooling. Sexuality & Culture, 12(4), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robinson, K., Bansel, P., Denson, N., Davies, C., & Ovendon, G. (2013). Growing up queer: Issues facing young Australians who are gender variant and sexuality diverse. Retrieved June 19, 2017, from http://www.glhv.org.au/files/Growing_Up_Queer2014.pdf.
  34. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  36. Said, E. W. (2000). Reflections on exile and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Seidman, S. (2015). The social construction of sexuality. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  38. Ullman, J. (2014). Ladylike/butch, sporty/dapper: Exploring ‘gender climate’ with Australian LGBTQ students using stage-environment fit theory. Sex Education, 14(4), 430–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ullman, J. (2015). ‘At-risk’ or school-based risk? Testing a model of school-based stressors, coping responses, and academic self-concept for same-sex attracted youth. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(4), 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ullman, J., & McGraw, K. (2014). Troubling silences and taboo texts: Constructing safer and more positive school climates for same-sex attracted high school students in Australia. In D. Carlson & E. Meyer (Eds.), Gender and sexualities in education: A reader (pp. 298–312). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  41. Wilkinson, L., & Pearson, J. (2009). School culture and the well-being of same-sex-attracted youth. Gender and Society, 23(4), 542–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zyngier, D. (2004). Doing education not doing time. Engaging pedagogies and pedagogues – What does student engagement look like in action? Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations