Advertisement

Gravity-Wave Detection in the Mesosphere Using Airglow Spectrometers and Meteor Radars

  • Robert HibbinsEmail author
  • Patrick EspyEmail author
  • Rosmarie de Wit
Chapter

Abstract

The atmospheric winds, density and temperature of the region between 80 and 100 km, known as the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT), are subject to the effects of solar and particle precipitation from above as well as to tidal and gravity-wave forcing from below (Fritts and Alexander 2003). Additionally, the solar heating of ozone and chemical heating due to oxygen recombination chemistry in this region compete with long-term cooling of the upper atmosphere caused by increases in greenhouse gases (Robel and Dickenson 1989; Akmaev et al. 2006; Hervig et al. 2016). However, naturally occurring fluctuations associated with variations in ozone, solar or wave forcing can mask, or even mimic, the evidence of secular change in measurements of the temperature, density and winds of the MLT. Thus, these naturally occurring variations, their mechanisms and their seasonal and solar cycle behaviour must be quantified along with the driving forces associated with small-scale wave activity that governs the general circulation of the upper atmosphere. This is only possible using long-term observations with high time resolution so that the underlying secular trends that may be associated with human activity can be assessed. However, long-term, semi-continuous measurements of MLT parameters such as wind and temperature are difficult to obtain. In this article, we discuss two complementary techniques for monitoring the MLT region with a particular focus on the influence of small-scale gravity-wave processes. In the first section, we discuss the use of meteor radars to quantify gravity-wave momentum flux from observations of the Doppler drift velocities of meteor trails. In the second section, we outline how spectroscopic measurements of the nightglow emission, resulting from the recombination of oxygen atoms produced during the daytime, have evolved into an important tool for gravity-wave studies.

Notes

Acknowledgements

REH and PJE are funded by the Research Council of Norway/CoE Contract 223252/F50 and through the ARISE2 project which is funded by the European Community’s Horizon 2020 programme under grant agreement no. 653980. RJW is supported through the NASA Postdoctoral Program, administered by Universities Space Research Association through a contract with NASA.

References

  1. Adler-Golden S (1997) Kinetic parameters for OH nightglow modeling consistent with recent laboratory measurements. J Geophys Res 102(A9):19969–19976.  https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA01622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akmaev RA, Fomichev VI, Zhu X (2006) Impact of middle-atmospheric composition changes on greenhouse cooling in the upper atmosphere. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 68:1879–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrioli VF, Fritts DC, Batista PP, Clemesha BR (2013a) Improved analysis of all-sky meteor radar measurements of gravity wave variances and momentum fluxes. Ann Geophys 31(5):889–908.  https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-889-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrioli VF, Fritts DC, Batista PP, Clemesha BR, Janches D (2013b) Diurnal variation in gravity wave activity at low and middle latitudes. Ann Geophys 31:2123–2135.  https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-2123-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrioli VF, Batista PP, Clemesha BR, Schuch NJ, Buriti RA (2015) Multi-year observations of gravity wave momentum fluxes at low and middle latitudes inferred by all-sky meteor radar. Ann Geophys 33:1183–1193.  https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1183-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker DJ, Stair AT Jr (1988) Rocket measurements of the altitude distributions of the hydroxyl airglow. Phys. Scripta 37:611–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bates DR (1988) Excitation and quenching of the oxygen bands in the nightglow. Planet Space Sci 36:875–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates DR (1992) Nightglow emissions from oxygen in the lower thermosphere. Planet Space Sci 40(211–221):1992Google Scholar
  9. Beig G, Keckhut P, Lowe RP, Roble RG, Mlynczak MG, Scheer J, Fomichev VI, Offermann D, French WJR, Shepherd MG, Semenov AI, Remsberg EE, She CY, Lübken FJ, Bremer J, Clemesha BR, Stegman J, Sigernes F, Fadnavis S (2003) Review of mesospheric temperature trends. Rev Geophys 41:1015–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bellisario C, Keckhut P, Blanot L, Hauchecorne A, Simoneau P (2014) O2 and OH night airglow emission derived from GOMOS-Envisat instrument. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 31:1301–1311.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00135.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bossert K, Fritts DC, Pautet P-D, Williams BP, Taylor MJ, Kaifler B, Dörnbrack A, Reid IM, Murphy DJ, Spargo AJ, MacKinnon AD (2015) Momentum flux estimates accompanying multiscale gravity waves over Mount Cook, New Zealand, on 13 July 2014 during the DEEPWAVE campaign. J Geophys Res 120(18):9323–9337Google Scholar
  12. de Wit RJ (2015) Quantifying the influence of the stratosphere on the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  13. de Wit RJ, Hibbins RE, Espy PJ, Orsolini YJ, Limpasuvan V, Kinnison DE (2014) Observations of gravity wave forcing of the mesopause region during the January 2013 major sudden stratospheric warming. Geophys Res Lett 41(13):4745–4752.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Wit RJ, Hibbins RE, Espy PJ (2015a) The seasonal cycle of gravity wave momentum flux and forcing in the high latitude northern hemisphere mesopause region. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 127:21–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2014.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Wit RJ, Hibbins RE, Espy PJ, Hennum EA (2015b) Coupling in the middle atmosphere related to the 2013 major sudden stratospheric warming. Ann Geophys 33(3):309–319.  https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-309-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Wit RJ, Janches D, Fritts DC, Hibbins RE (2016) QBO modulation of the mesopause gravity wave momentum flux over Tierra del Fuego. Geophys Res Lett 43(8):4049–4055.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dodd JA, Lipson SJ, Lowell JR, Armstrong PS, Blumberg WAM, Nadile RM, Adler-Golden SM, Marinelli WJ, Holtzclaw KW, Green BD (1994) Analysis of hydroxyl earthlimb airglow emissions: Kinetic model for state-to-state dynamics of OH (v, N). J Geophys Res 99(D2):3559–3585.  https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD03338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ern M, Preusse P, Alexander MJ, Warner CD (2004) Absolute values of gravity wave momentum flux derived from satellite data. J Geophys Res 109:D20103.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ern M, Preusse P, Gille JC, Hepplewhite CL, Mlynczak MG, Russell JM III, Riese M (2011) Implications for atmospheric dynamics derived from global observations of gravity wave momentum flux in stratosphere and mesosphere. J Geophys Res 116:D19107.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Espy PJ, Hammond MR (1995) Atmospheric transmission coefficients for hydroxyl rotational lines used in rotational temperature determinations. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 54:879–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Espy PJ, Stegman J (2002) Trends and variability of mesospheric temperature at high latitudes. Phys Chem Earth 27:543–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fritts DC (1984) Gravity wave saturation in the middle atmosphere: a review of theory and observations. Rev Geophys 22(3):275–308.  https://doi.org/10.1029/RG022i003p00275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fritts D, Alexander M (2003) Gravity wave dynamics and effects in the middle atmosphere. Rev Geophys 41(1).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001rg000106
  24. Fritts DC, Janches D, Hocking WK (2010a) Southern Argentina Agile Meteor Radar: initial assessment of gravity wave momentum fluxes. J Geophys Res 115(D19123).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd013891
  25. Fritts DC, Janches D, Iimura H, Hocking WK, Mitchell NJ, Stockwell RG, Fuller B, Vandepeer B, Hormaechea J, Brunini C, Levato H (2010b) Southern Argentina Agile Meteor Radar: system design and initial measurements of large-scale winds and tides. J Geophys Res 115(D18112).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd013850
  26. Fritts DC, Janches D, Iimura H, Hocking WK, Bageston JV, Leme NMP (2012a) Drake Antarctic Agile Meteor Radar first results: configuration and comparison of mean and tidal wind and gravity wave momentum flux measurements with Southern Argentina Agile Meteor Radar. J Geophys Res 117.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fritts DC, Janches D, Hocking WK, Mitchell NJ, Taylor MJ (2012b) Assessment of gravity wave momentum flux measurement capabilities by meteor radars having different transmitter power and antenna configurations. J Geophys Res 117:D10108.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fritts DC, Pautet P-D, Bossert K, Taylor MJ, Williams BP, Iimura H, Yuan T, Mitchell NJ, Stober G (2014) Quantifying gravity wave momentum fluxes with mesosphere temperature mappers and correlative instrumentation. J Geophys Res Atmos 119:13583–13603.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fritts DC et al (2016) The Deep Propagating Gravity Wave Experiment (DEEPWAVE): an airborne and ground-based exploration of gravity wave propagation and effects from their sources throughout the lower and middle atmosphere. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 97:425–453.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00269.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Funke B, López-Puertas M, Gil-López S, von Clarmann T, Stiller GP, Fisher H, Kellmann S (2005) Downward transport of upper atmospheric NOx into the polar stratosphere and lower mesosphere during the Antarctic 2003 and Arctic 2002/2003 winters. J Geophys Res 110:D24308.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hervig ME, Berger U, Siskind DE (2016) Decadal variability in PMCs and implications for changing temperature and water vapor in the upper mesosphere. J Geophys Res Atmos 121:2383–2392.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hocking WK (2005) A new approach to momentum flux determinations using SKiYMET meteor radars. Ann Geophys 23(7):2433–2439.  https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-2433-2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hocking WK, Fuller B, Vandepeer B (2001) Real-time determination of meteor-related parameters utilizing modern digital technology. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 63:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holton JR (1983) The influence of gravity wave breaking on the general circulation of the middle atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 40(10):2497–2507.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040h2497:TIOGWBi2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holton JR, Alexander MJ (2000) The role of waves in the transport circulation of the middle atmosphere. In: Siskind DE, Eckermann SD, Summers ME (eds) Atmospheric science across the stratopause. American Geophysical Union,  https://doi.org/10.1029/gm123p0021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Körnich H, Becker E (2010) A simple model for the interhemispheric coupling of the middle atmosphere circulation. Adv Space Res 45(5):661–668.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindzen RS (1981) Turbulence and stress owing to gravity-wave and tidal breakdown. J Geophys Res 86(NC10):9707–9714.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JC086iC10p09707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meinel AB (1950a) OH emission bands in the spectrum of the night sky-I. Astrophys J 111:555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meinel AB (1950b) OH emission bands in the spectrum of the night sky-II. Astrophys J 112:120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mitchell NJ, Pancheva D, Middleton HR, Hagan M (2002) Mean winds and tides in the Arctic mesosphere and lower thermosphere. J Geophys Res 107(A1).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001ja900127
  41. Moss AC, Wright CJ, Davis RN, Mitchell NJ (2016) Gravity-wave momentum fluxes in the mesosphere over Ascension Island (8°S, 14°W) and the anomalous zonal winds of the semi-annual oscillation in 2002. Ann Geophys 34:323–330.  https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-323-2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murtagh DP (1995) The state of O2 in the mesopause region. In: Johnson RM, Killeen TL (eds) Energetics, dynamics, and electrodynamics of the mesosphere and lower thermosphere, vol 87. Geophys. Monograph, Publ. AGU, Washington, pp 243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pautet P-D, Taylor MJ, Pendleton WR, Zhao Y, Yuan T, Esplin R, McLain D (2014) Advanced mesospheric temperature mapper for high-latitude airglow studies. Appl Opt 53:5934–5943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pendleton WR Jr, Espy PJ, Hammond MR (1993) Evidence for non-local-thermodynamic-equilibrium in the OH nightglow. J Geophys Res 98:11567–11579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pilger C, Schmidt C, Streicher F, Wüst S, Bittner M (2013) Airglow observations of orographic, volcanic and meteorological infrasound signatures. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 104:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Placke M, Stober G, Jacobi C (2011a) Gravity wave momentum fluxes in the MLT—Part I: Seasonal variation at Collm (51.3°N, 13.0°E). J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 73(9):904–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Placke M, Hoffmann P, Becker E, Jacobi C, Singer W, Rapp M (2011b) Gravity wave momentum fluxes in the MLT—Part II: Meteor radar investigations at high and midlatitudes in comparison with modeling studies. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 73(9):911–920.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reid IM, Vincent RA (1987) Measurements of mesospheric gravity-wave momentum fluxes and mean flow accelerations at Adelaide, Australia. J Atmos Terr Phys 49(5):443–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roble RG, Dickinson RE (1989) How will changes in carbon dioxide and methane modify the mean structure of the mesosphere and thermosphere? Geophys Res Lett 16:1441–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schmidt C, Höppner K, Bittner M (2013) A ground-based spectrometer equipped with an InGaAs array for routine observations of OH(3-1) rotational temperatures in the mesopause region. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 102:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shepherd GG, Roble RG, Zhang S-P, McLandress C, Wiens RH (1998) Tidal influence on midlatitude airglow: comparison of satellite and ground-based observations with TIME-GCM predictions. J Geophys Res 103(A7):14741–14751.  https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA00884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stray NH, de Wit RJ, Espy PJ, Hibbins RE (2014) Observational evidence for temporary planetary-wave forcing of the MLT during fall equinox. Geophys Res Lett 41(17):6281–6288.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor MJ, Espy PJ, Baker DJ, Sica RJ, Neal PC, Pendleton WR Jr (1991) Simultaneous temperature, intensity and imaging measurements of gravity waves in the OH nightglow emission. Planet Space Sci 39:1171–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas GE (1991) Mesospheric clouds and the physics of the mesopause region. Rev Geophys 29(4):553–575.  https://doi.org/10.1029/91RG01604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vincent RA, Reid IM (1983) MF Doppler measurements of mesospheric gravity-wave momentum fluxes. J Atmos Sci 40(5):1321–1333.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040h1321:HDMOMGi2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. von Savigny C, Eichmann K-U, Llewellyn EJ, Bovensmann H, Burrows JP, Bittner M, Höppner K, Offermann D, Steinbrecht W, Winkler P, Taylor MJ, Cheng Y (2004) First near-global retrieval of OH rotational temperatures from satellite-based Meinel band emission measurements. Geophys Res Lett 31(15):L15111.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Won Y-I, Cho Y-M, Lee BY, Kim J (2001) Studies of gravity waves using Michelson interferometer measurements of OH (3-1) bands. J Astron Space Sci 18(1):21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wüst S, Wendt V, Schmidt C, Lichtenstern S, Bittner M, Yee J-H, Mlynczak MG, Russell JM III (2016) Derivation of gravity wave potential energy density from NDMC measurements. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 138–139:32–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Birkeland Centre for Space ScienceBergenNorway
  3. 3.Space Weather LaboratoryNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA
  4. 4.Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik (ZAMG)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations