Advertisement

New Generations of Infrasound Sensors: Technological Developments and Calibration

  • Guillaume NiefEmail author
  • Carrick Talmadge
  • Jeff Rothman
  • Thomas Gabrielson
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explains the principles of functioning of sensors dedicated to record infrasound data. For various sensor models, the types of infrasound pressure transducers are described, and the performances are given, in terms of self-noise, sensitivity, and passband. The way to calibrate these infrasound sensors and infrasound stations on field is also reported. An in situ calibration method using additional reference sensors to an infrasound station has been developed to recover the overall response of the station element including the wind noise reducing system.

References

  1. Alcoverro B, Le Pichon A (2005) Design and optimization of a noise reduction system for infrasonic measurements using elements with low acoustic impedance. J Acoust Soc Am 117(4):1717–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bendat J, Piersol A (2000) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, 3rd edn. Wiley, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowman JR, Shields G, O’Brien MS (2007) Infrasound station ambient noise estimates and models: 2003–2006. In: Infrasound technology workshop, Tokyo, Japan 13–16 Nov 2007Google Scholar
  4. Dravida S (2007) Development of a self-calibrating infrasound microphone and its adaptability to lower audible frequencies, PhD Thesis, University of Mississippi, 116 pGoogle Scholar
  5. Gabrielson TB (2011) In-situ calibration of atmospheric-infrasound sensors including the effects of wind-noise-reduction pipe systems. J Acoust Soc Am 130:1154–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haak HW, De Wilde GJ (1996) Microbarograph systems for the infrasonic detection of nuclear explosions. Scientific Report WR 96–06, KNMIGoogle Scholar
  7. Marty J (2019) The IMS infrasound network: current status and technological developments. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–62Google Scholar
  8. Mentink JH, Evers LG (2011) Frequency response and design parameters for differential microbarometers. J Acoust Soc Am 130(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Parmantier Y, Kratz F (2009) Capteurs: definitions, principes de détection. Techniques de l’ingénieur R400:1–13Google Scholar
  10. Ponceau D, Bosca L (2010) Low noise bradband microbarometers. In: Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  11. Raspet R, Abbott J-P, Webster J, Yu J, Talmadge C, Alberts II K, Collier S, Noble J (2019) New systems for wind noise reduction for infrasonic measurements. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 91–124Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillaume Nief
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carrick Talmadge
    • 2
  • Jeff Rothman
    • 3
  • Thomas Gabrielson
    • 4
  1. 1.CEA, DAM, DIFArpajonFrance
  2. 2.National Center for Physical Acoustics, University of MississippiOxfordUSA
  3. 3.Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  4. 4.Pennsylvania State UniversityState CollegUSA

Personalised recommendations