Advertisement

Characterization of the Infrasonic Wavefield from Repeating Seismo-Acoustic Events

  • Steven GibbonsEmail author
  • Tormod Kværna
  • Peter Näsholm
Chapter

Abstract

Infrasound can provide unique data on extreme atmospheric events such as meteor impacts, severe weather systems, man-made explosions, and volcanic eruptions. Use of infrasound for remote event detection and location requires high-quality temporal and spatial atmospheric models, and infrasound generated by so-called Ground Truth events (for which the time and location are known) are necessary to evaluate atmospheric models and assess network performance. Large industrial blasts and military explosions are tightly constrained in time and space using seismic data and can generate infrasound recorded both regionally and at great distances. The most useful seismo-acoustic sources are repeating sources at which explosions take place relatively frequently. Over time, these may provide records of up to many hundreds of events from the same location from which characteristics and variability of the infrasonic wavefield and atmospheric conditions can be assessed on a broad range of timescales. Over the past 20 years or so, numerous databases of repeating explosions have been compiled in various parts of the world. Events are associated confidently with known sources, with accurately determined origin times, usually by applying waveform correlation or similar techniques to the characteristic seismic signals generated by each explosive source. The sets of sources and stations ideally result in atmospheric propagation paths covering a wide range of distances and directions, and the databases ideally include events covering all seasons. For selected repeating sources and infrasound arrays, we have assessed the variability of infrasonic observation: including the documentation of lack of observed infrasound. These observations provide empirical celerity, back azimuth deviation, and apparent velocity probability distributions. Such empirical distributions have been demonstrated in numerous recent studies to provide infrasonic event location estimates with significantly improved uncertainty estimates. Tropospheric, stratospheric, and thermospheric returns have been observed, even at distances below 200 km. This information is now providing essential input data for studies of the middle and upper atmosphere.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Alexis Le Pichon for providing the infrasound event bulletin of the CEA (Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives).

We thank Hans Israelsson for his lists of IMS infrasound detections associated with Ground Truth events at Hukkakero.

Data from the Sodankylä (SDK) array is obtained with thanks from the Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF) and data from I18DK was obtained from the International Data Center of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization, Vienna.

Data from ARCES and I37NO are available from NORSAR from

http://www.norsardata.no/NDC/data/autodrm.html

Graphics are generated using the GMT software (Wessel and Smith 1995).

The IRIS reference event infrasound database is found at

http://ds.iris.edu/ds/products/infrasound-taired/ (last referenced January 2016).

References

  1. Arrowsmith SJ, Hedlin MAH, Stump B, Arrowsmith MD (2008) Infrasonic signals from large mining explosions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:768–777.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrowsmith M, Arrowsmith S, Marcillo O (2016) Using sounds from the ocean to measure winds in the stratosphere. EOS 97:  https://doi.org/10.1029/2016EO042563
  3. Assink JD, Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Kallel M, Khemiri L (2014) Evaluation of wind and temperature profiles from ECMWF analysis on two hemispheres using volcanic infrasound. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(14):8659–8683.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assink J, Smets P, Marcillo O, Weemstra C, Lalande J-M, Waxler R, Evers L (2019) Advances in infrasonic remote sensing methods. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 605–632Google Scholar
  5. Arrowsmith SJ, Johnson JB, Drob DP, Hedlin MAH (2010) The seismoacoustic wavefield: a new paradigm in studying geophysical phenomena. Rev Geophys 48:RG4003+.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010rg000335
  6. Bondar I, Engdahl ER, Yang X, Ghalib HAA, Hofstetter A, Kirichenko V, Wagner R, Gupta I, Ekstrom G, Bergman E, Israelsson H, McLaughlin K (2004) Collection of a reference event set for regional and teleseismic location calibration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(4):1528–1545.  https://doi.org/10.1785/012003128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonner J, Waxler R, Gitterman Y, Hofstetter R (2013) Seismo-acoustic energy partitioning at near-source and local distances from the 2011 Sayarim explosions in the Negev desert. Israel. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(2A):741–758.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ceranna L, Le Pichon A, Green DN, Mialle P (2009) The Buncefield explosion: a benchmark for infrasound analysis across Central Europe. Geophys J Int 177:491–508.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2008.03998.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chambers DJA, Koper KD, Pankow KL, McCarter MK (2015) Detecting and characterizing coal mine related seismicity in the Western U.S. using subspace methods. Geophys J Int 203:1388–1399.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Che IY, Jun MS, Jeon JS, Min KD (2002) Analysis of local seismo-acoustic events in the Korean Peninsula. Geophys Res Lett 29:1589+.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl014060
  11. Che IY, Stump BW, Lee HI (2011) Experimental characterization of seasonal variations in infrasonic traveltimes on the Korean Peninsula with implications for infrasound event location. Geophys J Int 185:190–200.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2011.04948.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Che IY, Park J, Kim I, Kim TS, Lee HI (2014) Infrasound signals from the underground nuclear explosions of North Korea. Geophys J Int 198:495–503.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Che IY, Park J, Kim TS, Hayward C, Stump B (2019) On the use of a dense network of seismo-acoustic arrays for near-regional environmental monitoring. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 409–448Google Scholar
  14. Che IY, Kim TS, Jeon JS, Lee HI (2009) Infrasound observation of the apparent North Korean nuclear test of 25 May 2009. Geophys Res Lett 36(22):L22,802+.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl041017
  15. Cugnet D, de la Camara A, Lott F, Millet C, Ribstein B (2019) Non-orographic gravity waves: representation in climate models and effects on infrasound. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 827–844Google Scholar
  16. Christie DR, Campus P (2009) The IMS infrasound network: design and establishment of infrasound stations. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies. Springer, Netherlands, chap 2, pp 29–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9508-5_2Google Scholar
  17. Chunchuzov I, Kulichkov S (2019) Internal gravity wave perturbations and their impacts on infrasound propagation in the atmosphere. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 551–590Google Scholar
  18. Chunchuzov I, Kulichkov S, Perepelkin V, Popov O, Firstov P, Assink JD, Marchetti E (2015) Study of the wind velocity-layered structure in the stratosphere, mesosphere, and lower thermosphere by using infrasound probing of the atmosphere. J Geophys Res Atmos 120(17):8828–8840.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dahlman O, Mackby J, Mykkeltveit S, Haak H (2011) Detect and deter: can countries verify the nuclear test ban? Springer Science and Business Media B, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-9-4007-1676-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Groot-Hedlin CD, Hedlin MAH (2015) A method for detecting and locating geophysical events using groups of arrays. Geophy J Int 203(2):960–971.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Groot-Hedlin C, Hedlin M (2019) Detection of infrasound signals and sources using a dense seismic network. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 669–699Google Scholar
  22. Evers L, Schweitzer J (2011) A climatology of infrasound detections in northern Norway at the experimental ARCI array. J Seismol 15:473–486.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-011-9237-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geller RJ, Mueller CS (1980) Four similar earthquakes in Central California. Geophys Res Lett 7(10):821–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibbons SJ, Asming V, Eliasson L, Fedorov A, Fyen J, Kero J, Kozlovskaya E, Kværna T, Liszka L, Näsholm SP, Raita T, Roth M, Tiira T, Vinogradov Y (2015a) The European Arctic: a laboratory for seismoacoustic studies. Seismol Res Lett 86:917–928.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibbons SJ, Kværna T, Mykkeltveit S (2015b) Could the IMS infrasound stations support a global network of small aperture seismic arrays? Seismol Res Lett 86:1148–1159.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibbons SJ, Ringdal F (2006) The detection of low magnitude seismic events using array-based waveform correlation. Geophys J Int 165:149–166.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02865.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibbons SJ, Ringdal F, Kværna T (2007) Joint seismic-infrasonic processing of recordings from a repeating source of atmospheric explosions. J Acoust Soc Am 122:EL158–EL164.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2784533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibbons S, Ringdal F (2010) Detection and analysis of near-surface explosions on the Kola Peninsula. Pure Appl Geophys 167:413–436.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-009-0038-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green DN, Le Pichon A, Ceranna L, Evers L (2009) Ground truth events: assessing the capability of infrasound networks using high resolution data analyses. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies. Springer, Netherlands, chap 19, pp 599–625.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9508-5_19Google Scholar
  30. Hagerty MT, Kim WY, Martysevich P (2002) Infrasound detection of large mining blasts in Kazakstan. In: Der ZA, Shumway RH, Herrin ET (eds) Monitoring the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty: data processing and infrasound, Pageoph Topical Volumes, Birkhäuser Basel, pp 1063–1079.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8144-9_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris DB (1991) A waveform correlation method for identifying quarry explosions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:2395–2418Google Scholar
  32. Harris DB, Dodge DA (2011) An autonomous system for grouping events in a developing aftershock sequence. Bull Seism Soc Am 101:763–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harris DB, Kværna T (2010) Superresolution with seismic arrays using empirical matched field processing. Geophys J Int 182:1455–1477.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04684.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harris DB, Ringdal F, Kremenetskaya EO, Mykkeltveit S, Schweitzer J, Hauk TF, Asming VE, Rock DW, Lewis JP (2003) Ground-truth collection for mining explosions in Northern Fennoscandia and Russia. In: Proceedings of the 25th seismic research review, nuclear explosion monitoring building the knowledge base, LA-UR-03-6029, Tucson, Arizona, 23–25 Sept 2003, pp 54–63Google Scholar
  35. Hedlin MAH, Drob DP (2014) Statistical characterization of atmospheric gravity waves by seismoacoustic observations. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(9):2013JD021,304+.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd021304Google Scholar
  36. Hedlin MAH, Walker KT (2013) A study of infrasonic anisotropy and multipathing in the atmosphere using seismic networks. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 371:  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hedlin MAH, Walker K, Drob DP, de Groot Hedlin, (2012) Infrasound: connecting the solid earth, oceans, and atmosphere. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 40:327–354.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Israelsson H (2013) Recordings from Hukkakero explosions in 2009 at infrasound stations of the IRF network. Technical report SIR 01-2013, SeismicInfra Research, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones KR (2014) Infrasound generation from the HH seismic hammer. Technical report. SAND2014-19350, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico. http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2014/1419350.pdf
  40. Karpechko A, Tummon F, Secretariat W (2016) Climate predictability in the stratosphere. World Meteorol Organ Bull 65. https://public.wmo.int/en/resources/bulletin/climate-predictability-stratosphere
  41. Lalande JM, Sèbe O, Landès M, Blanc-Benon P, Matoza RS, Le Pichon A, Blanc E (2012) Infrasound data inversion for atmospheric sounding. Geophys J Int 190:687–701.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2012.05518.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Le Pichon A, Assink JD, Heinrich P, Blanc E, Charlton-Perez A, Lee CF, Keckhut P, Hauchecorne A, Rüfenacht R, Kämpfer N, Drob DP, Smets PSM, Evers LG, Ceranna L, Pilger C, Ross O, Claud C (2015) Comparison of co-located independent ground-based middle atmospheric wind and temperature measurements with numerical weather prediction models. J Geophys Res Atmos 120(16):8318–8331.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Le Pichon A, Vergoz J, Herry P, Ceranna L (2008) Analyzing the detection capability of infrasound arrays in Central Europe. J Geophys Res Atmos 113(D12):D12,115+.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009509
  44. Marty J (2019) The IMS infrasound network: current status and technological developments. In: Le Pichon A, Blanc E, Hauchecorne A (eds) Infrasound monitoring for atmospheric studies, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–62Google Scholar
  45. Modrak RT, Arrowsmith SJ, Anderson DN (2010) A Bayesian framework for infrasound location. Geophys J Int 181:399–405.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04499.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McKenna MH, Stump BW, Hayek S, McKenna JR, Stanton TR (2007) Tele-infrasonic studies of hard-rock mining explosions. J Acoust Soc Am 122:97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2741375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morton EA, Arrowsmith SJ (2014) The development of global probabilistic propagation look-up tables for infrasound celerity and back-azimuth deviation. Seismol Res Lett 85(6):1223–1233.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nippress A, Green DN, Marcillo OE, Arrowsmith SJ (2014) Generating regional infrasound celerity-range models using ground-truth information and the implications for event location. Geophys J Int 197:1154–1165.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pulli JJ, Kofford A (2015) Infrasonic analysis of the October 28, 2014 Antares rocket failure at Wallops Island, Virginia, using video recordings as ground truth. J Acoust Soc Am 137(4):2372.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4920619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ringdal F, Kværna T (1989) A multi-channel processing approach to real time network detection, phase association, and threshold monitoring. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:1927–1940Google Scholar
  51. Smets PSM, Assink JD, Le Pichon A, Evers LG (2016) ECMWF SSW forecast evaluation using infrasound. J Geophys Res Atmos 121(9):4637–4650.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smets PSM, Evers LG, Näsholm SP, Gibbons SJ (2015) Probabilistic infrasound propagation using realistic atmospheric perturbations. Geophys Res Lett 42(15):6510–6517.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl064992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sorrells GG, Herrin ET, Bonner JL (1997) Construction of regional ground truth databases using seismic and infrasound data. Seismol Res Lett 68:743–752.  https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.5.743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stump BW, Hedlin MAH, Pearson DC, Hsu V (2002) Characterization of mining explosions at regional distances: implications with the international monitoring system. Rev Geophys 40:1011+.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1998rg000048
  55. Stump B, Jun MS, Hayward C, Jeon JS, Che IY, Thomason K, House SM, McKenna J (2004) Small-aperture seismo-acoustic arrays: design, implementation, and utilization. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:220–236.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tailpied D, Le Pichon A, Marchetti E, Ripepe M, Kallel M, Ceranna L, Brachet N (2013) Remote infrasound monitoring of Mount Etna: observed and predicted network detection capability. Inframatics 2:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.4236/inframatics.2013.21001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor SR, Harben PE, Jarpe S, Harris DB (2011) Development of mine explosion ground truth smart sensors. In: Proceedings of the 2011 monitoring research review: ground-based nuclear explosion monitoring technologies, Tucson, Arizona, 13–15 Sept 2011. Report LA-UR-11-04823, pp 850–860Google Scholar
  58. Waldhauser F, Ellsworth WL (2000) A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: method and application to the northern Hayward fault. California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90(6):1353–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walker KT, Shelby R, Hedlin MAH, de Groot-Hedlin C, Vernon F (2011) Western U.S. infrasonic catalog: illuminating infrasonic hot spots with the US array. J Geophys Res Atmos 116(B12):B12,305+.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jb008579
  60. Wessel P, Smith WHF (1995) New version of the generic mapping tools. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 76:329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whitaker RW, Mutschlecner JP (2008) A comparison of infrasound signals refracted from stratospheric and thermospheric altitudes. J Geophys Res Atmos 113(D8):D08,117+.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008852

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Gibbons
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tormod Kværna
    • 1
  • Peter Näsholm
    • 1
  1. 1.NORSARKjellerNorway

Personalised recommendations