This chapter is a final reflection which also highlights the specific contribution that this enquiry brings to the academic literature, its limitations and implications for practitioners wishing to implement circular economy-driven business model innovation.
KeywordsResearch contribution Research limitations Research implications
- Barton, D. (2011). Capitalism for the long term. Harvard Business Review, 11 (March), 84–91.Google Scholar
- Clinton, L., & Whisnant, R. (2014). Model behavior. 20 business model innovations for sustainability. Retrieved February 2015, from www.sustainability.com.
- EC. (2015). Closing the loop: An action plan for the circular economy. Retrieved August 2017, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614&from=EN.
- EMF, McKinsey, & SUN. (2015). Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Retrieved July 2015, from http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/business/reports.
- Hahn, T., Figge, F., Aragón-Correa, J., & Sharma, S. (2015). Advancing research on corporate sustainability: Off to pastures new or back to the roots? Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315576152.
- Hunt, C., & Auster, E. (1990). Proactive environmental management: Avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review, 31, 7–18.Google Scholar
- Moreno, M., De los Rios, C., Rowe, Z., & Charnley, F. (2016). A conceptual framework for circular design. Sustainability, 8, 1–15.Google Scholar
- Reed, M. (2009). The theory/practice gap: A problem for research in business school? Journal of Management Development, 28, 685–693.Google Scholar
- Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20, 936–960.Google Scholar