Sixty Years (or so) of Language Data in Mathematics Education

Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

This chapter, based both on pre-ICME-13 conference documents as well as on the author’s actual panel presentation made at TSG 31, covers a range of themes concerned with the issues of ‘language data’ in mathematics education. It also addresses several instances from its history, including word problems, classroom language and transcription, in addition to the mathematics register, its syntax, semantics and pragmatics.

Keywords

Language data Mathematics register Nominalisation Transcript Word problems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to David Wagner and Judit N. Moschkovich for comments on earlier drafts, as well as Nathalie Sinclair, my ideal reader.

References

  1. Aiken, L. (1972). Language factors in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 42(3), 359–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, J., & Howson, G. (1979). Language and mathematical education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 10(2), 161–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartolini Bussi, M., Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Ramploud, A. (2014). Intercultural dialogue and the geography and history of thought. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(1), 31–33.Google Scholar
  4. Barwell, R. (2013). The academic and the everyday in mathematicians’ talk: The case of the hyperbagel. Language and Education, 27(3), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barwell, R., Clarkson, P., Halai, A., Kazima, M., Moschkovich, J., Planas, N., et al. (Eds.). (2016). Mathematics education and language diversity. Cham, CH: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Baudrillard, J. (1995/2007). Fragments: Cool memories III, 1990–1995. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter, T., Moser, J., & Romberg, T. (1982). Addition and subtraction: A cognitive approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Châtelet, G. (2000). Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chorney, S. (2017). Circles, materiality and movement. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(3), 2–5.Google Scholar
  10. Chouchan, M. (1995). Nicolas Bourbaki: Faits et légendes. Argenteuil, FR: Éditions du Choix.Google Scholar
  11. Chrisomalis, S. (2010). Numerical notation: A comparative history. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. diSessa, A. (2007). An interactional analysis of clinical interviewing. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 523–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faulkner, W. (1956). The art of fiction XII: William Faulkner (an interview with Jean Stein). The Paris Review, 12, 28–52.Google Scholar
  14. Gerofsky, S. (1996). A linguistic and narrative view of word problems in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(2), 36–45.Google Scholar
  15. Gerofsky, S. (2004). A man left Albuquerque heading east: Word problems as genre in mathematics education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Ginsburg, H. (1981). The clinical interview in psychological research on mathematical thinking: Aims, rationales, techniques. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(3), 4–11.Google Scholar
  17. Green, C. (1992). Of immortal mythological beasts: Operationism in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 2(3), 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 42–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Halliday, M. (1975). Some aspects of sociolinguistics. In UNESCO (Ed.), Interactions between linguistics and mathematical education (pp. 64–73). Copenhagen, DK: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  20. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Pimm, D. (2014). The one and the many: Transcripts and the art of interpretation. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(2), 38–40.Google Scholar
  21. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2010). Appraising lexical bundles in mathematics classroom discourse: Obligation and choice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jamieson, K. (1975). Antecedent genre as rhetorical constraint. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61(4), 406–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jerman, M., & Rees, R. (1972). Predicting the relative difficulty of verbal arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4(3), 306–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lepik, M. (1990). Algebraic word problems: Role of linguistic and structural variables. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lunney Borden, L. (2011). The ‘verbification’ of mathematics: Using the grammatical structures of Mi’kmaq to support student learning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(3), 8–13.Google Scholar
  28. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Molland, G. (1976). Shifting the foundations: Descartes’s transformation of ancient geometry. Historia Mathematica, 3(1), 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1/2), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morgan, C., & Burton, L. (2000). Mathematicians writing. Journal for Research in Matheamtics Education, 31(4), 429–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moschkovich, J. (2018). Recommendations for research on language and learning mathematics. In J. Moschkovich, D. Wagner, A. Bose, J. Rodrigues, & M. Schütte (Eds.), Language and communication in mathematics education: International perspectives (pp. 37–47, this volume). Dordrecht, NL: Springer. Google Scholar
  33. Nesher, P. (1972). Transition from natural language to arithmetic language in the primary grades (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. Nesher, P., & Katriel, T. (1977). A semantic analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in arithmetic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8(3), 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nesher, P., & Teubal, E. (1975). Verbal cues as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(1), 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Netz, R. (1999). The shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics: A study in cognitive history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ng, O. (2015). The interplay between language, gestures, dragging and diagrams in bilingual learners’ mathematical communications. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Núñez, R. (2004/2006). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In R. Hersh (Ed.), 18 unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics (pp. 160–181). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 41–72). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Phillips, E. (2002). Classroom explorations of mathematical writing with nine- and ten-year-olds (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
  42. Pimm, D. (1987; reissued 2016). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  43. Pimm, D. (1994). Another psychology of mathematics education. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Constructing mathematical knowledge: Epistemology and mathematics education (pp. 111–124). London, UK: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pimm, D. (2004). A case of you: Remembering David Fowler. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(2), 16–17.Google Scholar
  45. Pimm, D. (2010). ‘The likeness of unlike things’: Insight, enlightenment and the metaphoric way. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(1), 20–22.Google Scholar
  46. Pimm, D. (2014a). Unthought knowns. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(3), 15–16.Google Scholar
  47. Pimm, D. (2014b). Authority, explanation, contention and register: Language data and the surface search for essence. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(6), 967–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pimm, D. (2017). Making a thing of it: Some conceptual commentary. In E. de Freitas, N. Sinclair, & A. Coles (Eds.), What is a mathematical concept? (pp. 269–283). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pimm, D. (2018). Script and subscript. In R. Zazkis & P. Herbst (Eds.), Scripting approaches in mathematics education: Mathematical dialogues in research and practice (pp. v–xi). Cham, CH: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Polanyi, M. (1966/2009). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Richardson, J. (2001). Vectors: Aphorisms & ten-second essays. Keene, NY: Ausable Press.Google Scholar
  52. Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse research in mathematics education: A critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sinclair, N. (2017). Crossroad blues. In E. Galindo & J. Newton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 100–108). Indianapolis, In: Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.Google Scholar
  54. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Staats, S. (2008). Poetic lines in mathematics discourse: A method from linguistic anthropology. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(2), 26–32.Google Scholar
  56. Staats, S. (2018). The poetics of argumentation: The relevance of conversational repetition for two theories of emergent mathematical reasoning. Research in Mathematics Education, 19(3), 276–292.Google Scholar
  57. Stubbs, M. (1986). Language, meaning and logic: A case study of some children’s language. In C. Hoyles & L. Burton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th PME Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 59–74). London, UK: University of London Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  58. Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  60. Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thorndike, E. (1922). The psychology of arithmetic. New York, NY: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Verschaffel, L., Depaepe, F., & van Dooren, W. (2014). Word problems in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 641–645). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Zazkis, R., & Herbst, P. (Eds.). (2018). Scripting approaches in mathematics education: Mathematical dialogues in research and practice. Cham, CH: Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Zwicky, J. (2003). Wisdom & metaphor. Kentville, NS: Gaspereau Press.Google Scholar
  65. Zwicky, J. (2010). Mathematical analogy and metaphorical insight. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(1), 9–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations